Knuckey, Jonathan. 2013. “Comments on “Reconsidering the ‘Palin Effect.’” Political Research Quarterly, 66(4): 959-962. Original DOI: 10.1177/1065912913508342.
The above article has been retracted due to containing unattributed overlap with unpublished materials.
References
1.
BroxBrianCasselsMadison. 2009. “The Contemporary Effects of Vice-Presidential Nominees: Sarah Palin and the 2008 Presidential Campaign.” Journal of Political Marketing8 (4): 349–63.
2.
BurmillaEdwardRyanJoshua. 2013. “Reconsidering the ‘Palin Effect’ in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.” Political Research Quarterly
3.
ElisRoy D.Sunshine Hillygus, and Norman Nie. 2010. “The Dynamics of Candidate Evaluations and Vote Choice in 2008: Looking to the Past or Future?”Electoral Studies29 (4): 582–93.
4.
JohnstonRichardThorsonEmily. 2009. “Coalitions in Presidential Campaigns, 2000–2008: Structure and Dynamics.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
5.
KenskiKate. 2010. “The Palin Effect and Vote Preference in the 2008 Presidential Election.” American Behavioral Scientist54 (3): 222–38.
6.
KnuckeyJonathan. 2012. “The ‘Palin Effect’ in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.” Political Research Quarterly65 (2): 275–89.
7.
UlbigStacy G.2010. “The Appeal of Second Bananas: The Impact of Vice Presidential Candidates on Presidential Vote Choice, Yesterday and Today.” American Politics Research38 (2): 330–55.
8.
WattenbergMartin P.1995. “The Role of Vice Presidential Candidate Ratings in Presidential Voting Behavior.” American Politics Quarterly23 (4): 504–14.
9.
WoodThomasOliverEric. 2012. “Toward a More Reliable Implementation of Ideology in Measures of Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly76 (4): 636–62.
