This study is the first to examine the equivalence of the 2005 Strong Interest Inventory with the 1994 Strong. The authors examine the parallel content scales of the two versions for female and male college students separately (n = 622). The scales include the six General Occupational Themes (GOTs), 22 of the 25 Basic Interest Scales (BISs) of the 1994 Strong, and four of the Personal Style Scales (PSSs). The mean differences between the two Strongs were mostly within .5 of a standard deviation (Cohen's d < .5). There was a pattern of slightly higher means on the 2005 Strong, possibly because of the 2005 Strong standardization sample compares to the 1994 norm group, being more ethnically diverse, less educated, and more representative of the 2000 U.S. Census. The correlations of the 1994 and 2005 content scales were ≥ .85 for the GOTs and PSSs, except for the Risk Taking/Adventure PSS. The 1994 and 2005 analoged US BIS correlations ranged from .64 to .97. The effect sizes for sex were comparable across versions.
Betz, N., Borgen, F., Rottinghaus, P., Paulsen, A., Halper, C., & Harmon, L. (2003). The Expanded Skills Confidence Inventory: Measuring basic dimensions of vocational activity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 76-100.
2.
Borgen, F.H., Larson, L.M., Bailey, D.C., Thompson, R.C., & Donnay, D.A.C. (2005). Continuity of the 1994 and 2004 Strong Interest Inventories. Unpublished manuscript.
3.
Campbell, D.P., & Borgen, F.H. (1999). Hollands theory and the development of interest inventories. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 86-101.
4.
Campbell, D.P., & Holland, J.L. (1972). A merger in vocational interest research: Applying Hollands theory to Strongs data. Journal of Vocational behavior , 2, 353-376.
5.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
6.
Donnay, D.A.C., & Borgen, F.H. (1996). Validity, structure, and content of the 1994 Strong Interest Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 275-291.
7.
Donnay, D.A.C., Thompson, R., Morris, M., & Schaubhut, N. (2005). Strong Interest Inventory manual: Research, development, and strategies for interpretation. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
8.
Gasser, C.E., Larson, L.M., & Borgen, F.H. (2007). Concurrent validity of the 2005 Strong Interest Inventory: An examination of gender and major field of study. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 23-43.
9.
Hansen, J.C. (1986). Strong Vocational Interest Blank/Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Advances in vocational psychology (pp. 1-29). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
10.
Hansen, J.C. (1990). Interest inventories. In S. Goldstein & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment (pp. 173-194). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
11.
Hansen, J.C. (1994). The measurement of vocational interests. In M. G. Rumsey & J. H. Harris (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification (pp. 293-316). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Hansen, J.C., & Campbell, D.C. (1985). Manual for the Strong Interest Inventory (4th ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
Harmon, L.W., Hansen J.C., Borgen, F.H., & Hammer, A.L. (1994). Applications and technical guide for the Strong Interest Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Holland, J.L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
16.
Isaacs, J., Borgen, F.H., Donnay, D.A.C., & Hansen, T.A. (1997, August). Self-efficacy and interests: Relationships of Holland themes to college major. Poster session presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association , Chicago.
17.
Larson, L., Rottinghaus, P., & Borgen, F.H. (2002). Meta-analysis of Big Six interests and Big Five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 217-239.
18.
Lattimore, R.R., & Borgen, F.H. (1999). Validity of the 1994 Strong Interest Inventory with racial and ethic groups in the United States. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46(2), 185-195.
19.
Olsen, L.L. (1996). Concurrent validity of the 1994 Strong Interest Inventory: A comparison of criterion groups by gender. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.
20.
Ralston, C.A., Borgen, F.H., Rottinghaus, P.J., & Donnay, D.A.C. (2004). Specificity in interest measurement: Basic Interest Scales and major field of study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 203-216.
21.
Rottinghaus, P.J., Larson, L.M., & Borgen, F.H. (2003). The relation of self-efficacy and interests: A meta-analysis of 60 samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 62, 221-236.
22.
Rottinghaus, P.J., Lindley, L.D., Green, M.A., & Borgen, F.H. (2002). Educational aspirations: The contribution of self-efficacy, interests, and personality. Journal of Vocational Behavior , 61, 1-19.
23.
Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the Differential Personality Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota .
24.
Tellegen, A. (2000). Manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire . Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
Staggs, G., Larson, L.M., & Borgen, F.H. (2007). Convergence of interests and personality: Meta-analyses of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire and the Strong Interest Inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 423-445.
