Gender,Racial-Ethnic,and Cohort Effects on STEM Interests: A Fourteen-Year Comparison

Abstract

Gender and racial-ethnic disparities continue to exist in participation within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. Because vocational interests predict career choice and educational interventions to help promote STEM interest among underrepresented groups have increased, research is needed to assess if meaningful changes have occurred with STEM-related interests, particularly among women and people of color who have historically been underrepresented in the STEM workforce. The present study examines vocational interests in large samples of college students across two cohorts who completed the Strong Interest Inventory in 2005 (N = 6,496) and 2019 (N = 21,146). Results indicate that STEM-related interest levels have increased both across gender (i.e., men and women) and racial-ethnic groups, specifically for Black, Latinx, Asian, and White college students over this period. Notably, STEM-related interests declined or stayed the same across cohorts for Native American students. Additionally, the gap between women and men narrowed for the Investigative General Occupational Theme and STEM-related Basic Interest Scales. Finally, these results are discussed within the context of vocational interest development and societal STEM-related initiatives and focus on increasing STEM interests among underrepresented youth living in the United States.

Keywords

career development career STEM STEM gender gap vocational interests

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allan

B. A.

Garriott

P. O.

Keene

C. N.

(2016). Outcomes of social class and classism in first- and continuing-generation college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(4), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000160

Allan

B. A.

Sterling

H. M.

Duffy

R. D.

(2020). Longitudinal relations among economic deprivation, work volition, and academic satisfaction: A psychology of working perspective. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 20(2), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-019-09405-3

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bernstein

B. L.

(2011). Managing barriers and building supports in science and engineering doctoral programs: Conceptual underpinnings for a new online training program for women. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.v17.i1.40

Betz

N. E.

(2023). Integrating 50 years of theory and research: Suggestions for directions on women’s career development. The Counseling Psychologist, 51(6), 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000231176246

Brockman

A. J.

(2021). “La Crème de la Crème”: How racial, gendered, and intersectional social comparisons reveal inequities that affect sense of belonging in STEM. Sociological Inquiry, 91(4), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12401

Brown

S. D.

Lent

R. W.

(2023). Social cognitive career theory. In Walsh

W. B.

Flores

L. Y.

Hartung

P. J.

Leong

F. T. L.

(Eds.), Career psychology: Models, concepts, and counseling for meaningful employment (pp. 42–59). American Psychological Association.

Bubany

S. T.

Hansen

J. I. C.

(2011). Birth cohort change in the vocational interests of female and male college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.08.002

10.

Cadaret

M. C.

Hartung

P. J.

Subich

L. M.

Weigold

I. K.

(2017). Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.002

11.

Campbell-Montalvo

Kersaint

Smith

C. A. S.

Puccia

Skvoretz

Wao

Martin

J. P.

MacDonald

Lee

(2022). How stereotypes and relationships influence women and underrepresented minority students’ fit in engineering. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(4), 656–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21740

12.

Cannady

M. A.

Greenwald

Harris

K. N.

(2014). Problematizing the STEM pipeline Metaphor: Is the STEM pipeline Metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Science Education, 98(3), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21108

13.

Chan

R. C.

(2022). A social cognitive perspective on gender disparities in self-efficacy, interest, and aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): The influence of cultural and gender norms. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00352-0

14.

Charlesworth

T. E. S.

Banaji

M. R.

(2019). Gender in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, causes, solutions. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 39(37), 7228–7243.

15.

Cheryan

Lombard

E. J.

Hudson

Louis

Plaut

V. C.

Murphy

M. C.

(2020). Double isolation: Identity expression threat predicts greater gender disparities in computer science. Self and Identity, 19(4), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1609576

16.

Chung

Kim

(2022). Expectancies, task values, and perceived costs: Reciprocal effects on math-related career intention and achievement among middle school girls. Learning and Individual Differences, 96(1), 102145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102145

17.

Deemer

E. D.

Lin

Soto

(2016). Stereotype threat and women’s science motivation: Examining the disidentification effect. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(4), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715616064

18.

Deziel

Olawo

Truchon

Golab

(2013). Analyzing the mental health of engineering students using classification and regression. In Educational data mining 2013.

19.

Donnay

D. A.

(1997). EK Strong's legacy and beyond: 70 years of the strong interest inventory. The Career Development Quarterly, 46(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb00688.x

20.

Donnay

D. A. C.

Morris

M. L.

Schaubhut

N. A.

Thompson

R. C.

(2004). Strong interest inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.

21.

Duffy

R. D.

Gensmer

Allan

B. A.

Kim

H. J.

Douglass

R. P.

England

J. W.

Autin

K. L.

Blustein

D. L.

(2019). Developing, validating, and testing improved measures within the psychology of working theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112(1), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.02.012

22.

Dunn

Shannon

McCullough

Jenda

Qazi

(2018). An innovative postsecondary education program for students with disabilities in stem (practice brief). Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 31(1), 19.

23.

Falk

N. A.

Rottinghaus

P. J.

Casanova

T. N.

Borgen

F. H.

Betz

N. E.

(2017). Expanding women’s participation in STEM: Insights from parallel measures of self-efficacy and interests. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(4), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716665822

24.

Flores

L. Y.

O’Brien

K. M.

(2002). The career development of Mexican American adolescent women: A test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.49.1.14

25.

Flores

L. Y.

Troyka

Lee

(2023). Building program structures to advance vocational research on women. The Counseling Psychologist, 51(6), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000231175194

26.

Fouad

N. A.

Kozlowski

M. B.

Schams

S. S.

Weber

K. N.

Tapia

W. D.

Burrows

S. G.

(2023). Why aren’t we there yet? The status of research in women’s career development. The Counseling Psychologist, 51(6), 786–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000231178539

27.

Fouad

N. A.

Singh

Cappaert

Chang

W. H.

Wan

(2016). Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.002

28.

Fredricks

J. A.

Eccles

J. S.

(2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.519

29.

Frenzel

A. C.

Goetz

Lüdtke

Pekrun

Sutton

R. E.

(2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014695

30.

Glass

J. L.

Sassler

Levitte

Michelmore

K. M.

(2013). What’s so special about STEM? A comparison of women’s retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social Forces, 92(2), 723–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot092

31.

González-Pérez

Mateos de Cabo

Sáinz

(2020). Girls in STEM: Is it a female role-model thing? Frontiers in psychology, 11, 2204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02204

32.

Hall

A. R.

Nishina

Lewis

J. A.

(2017). Discrimination, friendship diversity, and STEM-related outcomes for incoming ethnic minority college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 103(6), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.08.010

33.

Hall

R. M.

Sandler

B. R.

(1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Association of American Colleges. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED215628

34.

Hanna

Rounds

(2020). How accurate are interest inventories? A quantitative review of career choice hit rates. Psychological Bulletin, 146(9), 765–796. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000269

35.

Hansen

J. I. C.

Dik

B. J.

(2005). Evidence of 12-year predictive and concurrent validity for SII Occupational Scale scores. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.001

36.

Harris

K. L.

Rottinghaus

P. J.

(2017). Vocational interest and personal style patterns: Exploring subjective well-being using the strong interest inventory. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715621009

37.

Heiser

(2018). Women were majority of U.S. medical school applicants in 2018. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/women-were-majority-us-medical-school-applicants-2018

38.

Hoff

K. A.

Granillo-Velasquez

K. E.

Hanna

Morris

Nelson

H. S.

Oswald

F. L.

(2024). Interested and employed? A national study of gender differences in basic interests and employment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 148(1), 103942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103942

39.

Huziak‐Clark

Sondergeld

van Staaden

Knaggs

Bullerjahn

(2015). Assessing the impact of a research‐based STEM program on STEM majors' attitudes and beliefs. School Science & Mathematics, 115(5), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12118

40.

Jones

K. S.

Newman

D. A.

Rounds

(2020). Black-White differences in vocational interests: Meta-analysis and boundary conditions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09693-5

41.

Kalender

Z. Y.

Marshman

Schunn

C. D.

Nokes-Malach

T. J.

Singh

(2019). Gendered patterns in the construction of physics identity from motivational factors. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.15.020119

42.

Kassaee

A. M.

Rowell

G. H.

(2016). Motivationally-informed interventions for at-risk STEM students. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 17(3).

43.

Kelly

(2017). Veterinary Medicine Is a Woman's World. https://www.vmdtoday.com/news/veterinary-medicine-is-a-womans-world

44.

Lazarides

Gaspard

Dicke

A.-L.

(2019). Dynamics of classroom motivation: Teacher enthusiasm and the development of math interest and teacher support. Learning and Instruction, 60(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.012

45.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

(2013). Social cognitive model of career self-management: Toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(4), 557–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033446

46.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027

47.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(1996). Career choice and development (3rd ed). Jossey-Bass Publishers.

48.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.47.1.36

49.

Lent

R. W.

Sheu

H. B.

Miller

M. J.

Cusick

M. E.

Penn

L. T.

Truong

N. N.

(2018). Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social–cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000243

50.

Leuty

M. E.

Hansen

J. I. C.

(2014). Teasing apart the relations between age, birth cohort, and vocational interests. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(2), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035341

51.

Lisberg

Woods

(2018). Mentorship, mindset and learning strategies: An integrative approach to increasing underrepresented minority student retention in a STEM undergraduate program. Journal of STEM Education, 19(3).

52.

Low

K. S.

Roberts

B. W.

Rounds

(2005). The stability of vocational interests from early adolescence to middle adulthood: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 713–737.

53.

McGee

E. O.

(2021). Black, Brown, Bruised: How racialized STEM education stifles innovation. Harvard Education Press.

54.

McPheron

(2007). 2007 Is DVM Year of the Woman. https://www.avma.org/javma-news/2007-06-15/2007-dvm-year-woman

55.

Morris

M. L.

(2016). Vocational interests in the United States: Sex, age, ethnicity, and year effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(5), 604–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000164

56.

National Archives and Records Administration. (2013). Educate to innovate. National Archives and Records Administration. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/issues/education/k-12/educate-innovate

57.

National Science Foundation . (2024). Higher education in science and engineering. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb202332/data#supplemental-tables

58.

Novakovic

Fouad

N. A.

(2013). Background, personal, and environmental influences on the career planning of adolescent girls. Journal of Career Development, 40(3), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845312449380

59.

Ong

Smith

(2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206–245. https://org.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/10.1002/tea.21417

60.

Pender

Marcotte

D. E.

Sto Domingo

M. R.

Maton

K. I.

(2010). The STEM pipeline: The role of summer research experience in minority students’ Ph. D. aspirations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(30), 1–36. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3155261/

61.

Petersen

J. L.

Hyde

J. S.

(2017). Trajectories of self-perceived math ability, utility value and interest across middle school as predictors of high school math performance. Educational Psychology, 37(4), 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1076765

62.

Potvin

Hasni

(2014). Analysis of the decline in interest towards school science and technology from Grades 5 through 11. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 784–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9512-x

63.

Prieto-Rodriguez

Sincock

Blackmore

(2020). STEM initiatives matter: Results from a systematic review of secondary school interventions for girls. International Journal of Science Education, 42(7), 1144–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1749909

64.

Rainey

Dancy

Mickelson

Stearns

Moller

(2018). Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM. International journal of STEM education, 5(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0115-6

65.

Rottinghaus

P. J.

Falk

N. A.

Park

C. J.

(2018). Career assessment and counseling for STEM: A critical review. The Career Development Quarterly, 66(1), 2–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12119

66.

Rounds

(2014). The nature and power of interests. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414522812

67.

Savelsbergh

E. R.

Prins

G. T.

Rietbergen

Fechner

Vaessen

B. E.

Draijer

J. M.

Bakker

(2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19(7), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.003

68.

Schelfhout

Wille

Fonteyne

Roels

Derous

De Fruyt

Duyck

(2021). How interest fit relates to STEM study choice: Female students fit their choices better. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 129(1), 103614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103614

69.

Scott

A. B.

Mallinckrodt

(2005). Parental emotional support, science self‐efficacy, and choice of science major in undergraduate women. The Career Development Quarterly, 53(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2005.tb00995.x

70.

Settles

I. H.

Jones

M. K.

Buchanan

N. T.

Dotson

(2021). Epistemic exclusion: Scholar(ly) devaluation that marginalizes faculty of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 14(4), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000174

71.

Sheu

H. B.

Bordon

J. J.

(2017). SCCT research in the international context: Empirical evidence, future directions, and practical implications. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716657826

72.

Sheu

H. B.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Miller

M. J.

Hennessy

K. D.

Duffy

R. D.

(2010). Testing the choice model of social cognitive career theory across Holland themes: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.015

73.

Shin

J. E. L.

Levy

S. R.

London

(2016). Effects of role model exposure on stem and non‐stem student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 410–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12371

74.

Stoet

Geary

D. C.

(2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719

75.

Rounds

Armstrong

P. I.

(2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 859–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017364

76.

Swanson

J. L.

Woitke

M. B.

(1997). Theory into practice in career assessment for women: Assessment and interventions regarding perceived career barriers. Journal of Career Assessment, 5(4), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279700500405

77.

Turner

S. L.

Lee

Jackson

A. P.

Smith

Mason-Chagil

Jacobs

S. C.

(2022). Examining the career self-management model among Native American students with STEM career goals. Journal of Career Development, 49(3), 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845320959464

78.

Turner

S. L.

Mason-Chagil

Jacobs

S. C.

Colston

Johnson

Patzkowsky

(2019). Correlates of native American engineering students’ career interests and efficacy: A test of SCCT. American Psychological Association 127th Annual Convention. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10110962-correlates-native-american-engineering-students-career-interests-efficacy-test-scct

79.

Turner

S. L.

McWhirter

E. H.

Lee

Mason-Chagil

Smith

Jacobs

S. C.

Jackson

A. P.

(2022b). Barriers to STEM efficacy and outcome expectations among native american college students. The Counseling Psychologist, 50(7), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000221108454

80.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics . (2024). Employment in STEM occupations. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/stem-employment.htm

81.

Wang

M. T.

Degol

J. L.

(2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x

82.

Wilkins-Yel

K. G.

Simpson

Sparks

P. D.

(2019). Persisting despite the odds: Resilience and coping among women in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 25(4), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2019026945

83.

Williams

T. R.

Pugh

Roberts

Autin

K. L.

Herdt

M. E.

Garcia

R. G.

(2023). Predicting Decent Work Among US Black Workers: Examining Psychology of Working Theory. Journal of Career Assessment, 31(4), 756–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727221149456

84.

(2023). Vocational interests: Conceptual issues, research findings, and practical applications. In Walsh

W. B.

Flores

L. Y.

Hartung

P. J.

Leong

F. T. L.

(Eds.), Career psychology: Models, concepts, and counseling for meaningful employment (pp. 140–161). American Psychological Association.

85.

Yang

Barth

J. M.

(2015). Gender differences in STEM undergraduates’ vocational interests: People–thing orientation and goal affordances. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 91(3), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.007

86.

Young

J. R.

Ortiz

N. A.

Young

J. L.

(2017). STEMulating interest: A meta-analysis of the effects of out-of-school time on student STEM interest. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.61149

87.

Zafar

(2013). College major choice and the gender gap. The Journal of Human Resources, 48(3), 545–595. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.48.3.545