European Family Patriarchy in the Past and Contemporary Developmental Inequalities

Abstract

This paper aims to show that contemporary developmental outcomes in Europe vary with historical patterns of age and gender inequality. It builds on the authors' earlier work constructing the Patriarchy Index (PI), which measures age and gender inequality within households based on historical census data. The claimed relationships are tested in a regression framework in which the outcome variables are a set of development indicators (GDP per capita and the HDI), as well as contemporary gender equality indices such as the GII and the SIGI and survey responses from the WVS. The study shows that high scores on the PI consistently predict worse development outcomes (lower development, more gender inequality) and more collectivist values scores. To assess the channels through which this correlation works, we also examine whether the PI itself is persistent, and find that the historical PI is also generally associated with important facets of patriarchal behaviour in the present. Overall, while our study cannot infer causal relationships, our results provide evidence that familial patriarchal patterns at the grassroots of society may be one of the variables associated with contemporary cultural and developmental divergences in Europe.

Keywords

family systems comparative development patriarchy historical persistence deep roots of gender inequality individualism collectivism family ties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alesina

Giuliano

(2010). The power of the family. Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2), 93–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-010-9052-z

Alesina

Giuliano

(2014). Family ties. In Aghion

Durlauf

(Eds), Handbook of economic growth, (Vol 2A, pp. 177–215). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53538-2.00004-6

Alesina

Giuliano

Nunn

(2013). On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2), 469–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt005

Alexander

A. C.

Welzel

(2015). Eroding patriarchy: The co-evolution of women's rights and emancipative values. International Review of Sociology, 25(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.976949

Ang

J. B.

(2019). Agricultural legacy and individualistic culture. Journal of Economic Growth, 24(4), 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-019-09171-5

Baum

Musolino

Gesesew

H. A.

Popay

(2021). New perspective on why women live longer than men: An exploration of power, gender, social determinants, and capitals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020661

Becker

S. O.

Woessmann

(2009). Was weber wrong? A human capital theory of protestant economic history. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 531–596. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.531

Bertocchi

Bozzano

(2015). Family structure and the education gender gap: Evidence from Italian provinces. CESifo Economic Studies, 61(1), 263–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifu026

Bertrand

Schoar

(2006). The role of family in family firms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.2.73

10.

Bisin

Verdier

(2001). The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(2), 298–319. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.2000.2678

11.

Bockstette

Chanda

Putterman

(2002). States and markets: The advantage of an early start. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(4), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020827801137

12.

Cain

(1988). Patriarchal structure and demographic change. In Conference on women’s position and demographic change in the course of development (1988: Oslo). Solicited papers (pp. 19–41). International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.

13.

Caldwell

(1982). Theory of fertility decline. Academic Press.

14.

Caldwell

J. C.

(1981). The mechanisms of demographic change in historical perspective. Population Studies, 35(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.1981.10404951

15.

Carmichael

S. G.

de Pleijt

Van zanden

J. L.

De Moor

(2015). Reply to Tracy Dennison and Sheilagh Ogilvie: The European marriage pattern and the little divergence. CGEH Working Paper Series, July 2015, Working Paper no. 70.

16.

Carmichael

S. G.

Dilli

Van Zanden

J. L.

(2016a). Introduction: Family systems and economic development. Economic History of Developing Regions, 31(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2015.1132625

17.

Carmichael

S. G.

de Pleijt

Van Zanden

J. L.

De Moor

(2016b). The European marriage pattern and its measurement. The Journal of Economic History, 76(1), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050716000474

18.

Carmichael

S. G.

Rijpma

(2017). Measuring agency. In Van Zanden

J. L.

Rijpma

Kok

(Eds.), Agency, gender, and economic development in the World economy 1850-2000: Testing the sen hypothesis (pp. 51–72). Routledge.

19.

Cioni

Federico

Vasta

(2022). Persistence studies: A new kind of economic history? Review of Regional Research, 42(3), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-022-00167-0

20.

Daniele

Geys

(2016). Family ties and socio-economic outcomes in high vs low income countries. Journal of Development Studies, 52(6), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1098630

21.

De Baca

T. C.

Sotomayor-Peterson

Smith-Castro

Figueredo

(2014). Contributions of matrilineal and patrilineal kin alloparental effort to the development of life history strategies and patriarchal values: A cross-cultural life history approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(4), 534–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113513068

22.

De Moor

Van Zanden

J. L.

(2010). Girl power: The European marriage pattern and labour markets in the North Sea region in the late medieval and early modern period. The Economic History Review, 63(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00483.x

23.

Dennison

T. K.

Ogilvie

(2014). Does the European marriage pattern explain economic growth? The Journal of Economic History, 74(3), 651–693. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050714000564

24.

Dilli

S. D.

(2017). The deep causes of economic development. Family systems and female agency. In Van Zanden

J. L.

Rijpma

Kok

(Eds.), Agency, gender, and economic development in the World economy 1850-2000: Testing the Sen hypothesis (pp. 138–161). Routledge.

25.

Duflo

(2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.4.1051

26.

Duranton

Rodríguez-Pose

Sandall

(2009). Family types and the persistence of regional disparities in Europe. Economic Geography, 85(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.01002.x

27.

Dyson

Moore

(1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972894

28.

Efron

(1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(397), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410

29.

Ermisch

Gambetta

(2010). Do strong family ties inhibit trust? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.007

30.

Fincher

C. L.

Thornhill

(2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(2), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000021

31.

Fincher

C. L.

Thornhill

Murray

D. R.

Schaller

(2008). Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 275(1640), 1279–1285. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0094

32.

Flandrin

J. L.

(1979). Families in former times, Kinship, household and sexuality (translated by Southern

). Cambridge University Press.

33.

Folbre

(2021). The rise and decline of patriarchal systems: An intersectional political economy. Verso.

34.

Foreman-Peck

(2011). The Western European marriage pattern and economic development. Explorations in Economic History, 48(2), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2011.01.002

35.

Galasso

Profeta

(2018). When the state mirrors the family: The design of pension systems. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(6), 1712–1763. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx046

36.

Galor

Klemp

(2014). The biocultural origins of human capital formation. NBER Working Paper No. 20474, September 2014.

37.

Gelfand

M. J.

Bhawuk

D. P. S.

Nishii

L. H.

Bechtold

D. J.

(2004). Individualism and collectivism. In House

R. J.

Hanges

P. J.

Javidan

Dorfman

P. W.

Gupta

(Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 437–512). Sage Publications.

38.

Goody

(1983). The development of the family and marriage in Europe. Cambridge University Press.

39.

Gorodnichenko

Roland

(2011). Individualism, innovation, and long-run growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(Suppl 4), 21316–21319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1101933108

40.

Greif

(2006). Family structure, institutions, and growth: The origins and implications of western corporations. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806777212602

41.

Grogan

L. A.

(2007). Patrilocality and human capital accumulation: Evidence from central Asia. The Economics of Transition, 15(4), 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2007.00305.x

42.

Gruber

Szołtysek

(2016). The patriarchy index: A comparative study of power relations across historical Europe. The History of the Family, 21(2), 133–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602x.2014.1001769

43.

Hansen

C. W.

Jensen

P. S.

Skovsgaard

C. V.

(2015). Modern gender roles and agricultural history: The Neolithic inheritance. Journal of Economic Growth, 20(4), 365–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9119-y

44.

Hardeman

Dijkstra

(2014). The EU regional human development index (EU-RHDI). European Commission Joint Research Centre Science and Policy Reports, Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC90538

45.

Henrich

(2020). The Weirdest people in the World: How the west became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Penguin Books.

46.

Hofstede

G. I.

Minkov

(2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Revised and expanded (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

47.

House

R. J.

Hanges

P. J.

Javidan

Dorfman

P. W.

Gupta

(Eds.), (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage Publications.

48.

Inglehart

Norris

(2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural. Change around the World. Cambridge University.

49.

Jayachandran

(2015). The roots of gender inequality in developing countries. Annual Review of Economics, 7(1), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115404

50.

Kambhampati

Rajan

(2008). The ‘Nowhere' Children: Patriarchy and the role of girls in India's rural economy. Journal of Development Studies, 44(9), 1309–1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380802264978

51.

Kaser

(2008). Patriarchy after patriarchy. Gender relations in Turkey and in the Balkans (pp. 1500–2000). Lit Verlag.

52.

Kick

Davis

Lehtinen

Wang

(2000). Family and economic growth: A world-system approach and a cross-national analysis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 41(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851801511738

53.

Kirkman

B. L.

Lowe

K. B.

Gibson

C. B.

(2006). A quarter century of culture's consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285–320. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400202

54.

Knack

Keefer

(1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475

55.

Kok

(2017). Women’s agency in historical family systems. In Van Zanden

J. L.

Rijpma

Kok

(Eds.), Agency, gender, and economic development in the World Economy 1850-2000: Testing the sen hypothesis. Routledge.

56.

Laslett

(1983). Family and household as work group and kin group: Areas of traditional Europe compared. In Wall

Robin

(Eds.), Family forms in historic Europe (pp. 513–563). Cambridge University Press.

57.

Le Bris

(2016). Family characteristics and economic development (October 28, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2511173. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2511173

58.

Levine

Zervos

(1998). Stock markets, banks, and economic growth. The American Economic Review, 88(3), 537–558.

59.

Malanima

(2010). Urbanisation 1700–1870. In Broadberry

O'Rourke

(Eds.), The Cambridge economic history of modern Europe, vol. I (pp. 235–263). Cambridge University Press.

60.

Mason

K. O.

(2001). Gender and Family systems in the fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 27(Supple), 160–176.

61.

Merouani

Perrin

(2022). Gender and the long-run development process. A survey of the literature. European Review of Economic History, 26(4), 612–641. https://doi.org/10.1093/ereh/heac008

62.

Mironov

B. N.

(2016). Long-term trends in the development of the family structure in Christian Russia from the sixteenth to the twentieth centuries: An analytical overview of historiography. Journal of Family History, 41(4), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363199016652618

63.

Mokyr

(2016). A culture of growth. The origins of the modern economy. Princeton University Press.

64.

Murray

D. R.

Schaller

(2010). Historical prevalence of infectious diseases within 230 geopolitical regions: A tool for investigating origins of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109349510

65.

Nimkoff

M. F.

(Ed.), (1965). Comparative family systems. Houghton & Mifiin.

66.

Nunn

(2020). The historical roots of economic development. Science, 367(6485), Article eaaz9986. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz9986

67.

Olsson

Paik

(2013). A western reversal since the Neolithic? The long-run impact of early agriculture. Working papers in economics No 552, Department of Economics School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg.

68.

Olsson

Paik

(2016). Long-run cultural divergence: Evidence from the Neolithic revolution. Journal of Development Economics, 122, 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.05.003

69.

Perrin

(2022). Can the historical gender gap index deepen our understanding of economic development? Journal of Demographic Economics, 88(3), 379–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2020.34

70.

Putterman

Weil

(2010). Post-1500 population flows and the long-run determinants of economic growth and inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4), 1627–1682. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1627

71.

Reher

D. S.

(1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 203–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/2807972

72.

Rijpma

Carmichael

S. G.

(2016). Testing Todd and matching Murdock: Global data on historical family characteristics. Economic History of Developing Regions, 31(1), 10–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2015.1114415

73.

Santos

Harrell

(Eds.), (2017). Transforming patriarchy. Chinese families in the 21st century. University of Washington Press.

74.

Santos Silva

Alexander

A. C.

Klasen

Welzel

(2023). The roots of female emancipation: Initializing role of Cool Water. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(1), 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2022.11.001

75.

Santos Silva

Klasen

(2021). Gender inequality as a barrier to economic growth: A review of the theoretical literature. Review of Economics of the Household, 19(3), 581–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-020-09535-6

76.

Scott-Samuel

(2009). Patriarchy, masculinities and health inequalities. Gaceta Sanitaria, 23(2), 159–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.11.007

77.

Sen

(1983). Economics and the family. Asian Development Review, 01(02), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0116110583000081

78.

Sookias

R. B.

Passmore

Atkinson

Q. D.

(2018). Deep cultural ancestry and human development indicators across nation states. Royal Society Open Science, 5(4), Article 171411. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171411

79.

Stanistreet

Bambra

Scott-Samuel

(2005). Is patriarchy the source of men's higher mortality? Journal of epidemiology and community health, 59(10), 873–876. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.030387

80.

Szołtysek

Gruber

(2016). Mosaic: Recovering surviving census records and reconstructing the familial history of Europe. The History of the Family, 21(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602x.2015.1006655

81.

Szołtysek

Klüsener

Poniat

Gruber

(2017). The patriarchy index: A new measure of gender and generational inequalities in the past. Cross-Cultural Research, 51(3), 228–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397117697666

82.

Szołtysek

Poniat

(2018). Historical family systems and contemporary developmental outcomes: What is to be gained from the historical census microdata revolution? The History of the Family, 23(3), 466–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602x.2018.1477686

83.

Therborn

(2004). Between sex and power: Family in the World 1900–2000. Routledge.

84.

Thornhill

Fincher

C. L.

(2014). Collectivism–individualism, family ties, and philopatry. In Thornhill

Fincher

C. L.

(Eds.), The parasite-stress theory of values and sociality: Infectious disease, History and human values worldwide (pp. 113-170). : Springer.

85.

Tillion

(1983). Republic of cousins. Zed Press.

86.

Todd

(1985). The explanation of ideology. Family structures and social systems. Basic Blackwell.

87.

Todd

(1987). The causes of progress: Culture, authority and change (Translated by Boulin

). Basil.

88.

Vandello

J. A.

Cohen

(1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.2.279

89.

Van Staveren

(2013). To measure is to know? A comparative analysis of gender indices. Review of Social Economy, 71(3), 339–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2012.707398

90.

Voth

H. J.

(2021). Persistence: Myth and mystery. In Bisin

Federico

(Eds.), Handbook of historical economics (pp. 243–268). Academic Press.

91.

Wall

(2001). Transformation of the European family across the centuries. In Wall

Hareven

T. K.

Ehmer

Cerman

(Eds.), Family history revisited. Comparative perspectives (pp. 217–241). University of Delaware Press.

92.

Weber

(1904). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Scribner’s Press.

93.

Welzel

(2013). Freedom rising. Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. Cambridge University Press.

94.

Whyte

M. K.

(1996). The Chinese family and economic development: Obstacle or Engine. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/452256

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.66 MB