Analyses of dynamic behavior of track transition with finite elements

Abstract

New types of vehicle and track elements are presented, by means of the finite element method, to establish a model for dynamic analysis of vehicle-track-subgrade coupling systems. The associated stiffness matrix, mass matrix and damping matrix for these two types of elements are deduced. Computational software is coded with Matlab. As an application example, the dynamic behavior of track transition is investigated by the vehicle and the track elements. The influencing factors for the simulation include train speed, subgrade stiffness, and irregularity angles of track transition as well as the transition pattern. The computational results show that 1) Abrupt changes of the subgrade stiffness influence the vertical acceleration of the rail and the wheel/rail contact force, and this influence increases with increases in train speed, 2) Both the irregularity angles of the track transition and the abrupt changes of the subgrade stiffness have significant effects on rail vertical acceleration and the wheel/rail contact force, with the peak value in this situation being greater than that generated by irregularity angles of the track transition or the abrupt changes of the subgrade stiffness, 3) Train speed, abrupt changes of the subgrade stiffness, and track transition irregularity angles have a minor influence on the vertical acceleration of the vehicle due to the excellent behavior of vibration isolation resulting from the primary and the secondary suspension systems of the vehicle, 4) Transition pattern for irregularity of track transition has a significant influence on the vehicle acceleration and the wheel/rail contact force, and the cosine transition is a much better indicator than the linear transition, and 5) Influences of the directions the train is moving on the dynamic behavior of the vehicle and the track are relatively insignificant.

Keywords

Contact force track element track transition vehicle and track interaction vehicle element vertical wheel/rail

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akira N. and Takahiro S. ( 2007) Evaluation of countermeasures against differential settlement at track transitions. Quarterly Report of the Railway Technical Research Institute (RTRI) 48(3): 176-182.

Bilow DN and Li D. ( 2005) Concrete slab track test on the high tonnage loop at the transportation technology center. In: Proceedings of the 2005 American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, 25-28 September, pp.119-133.

Davis D. and Li D. ( 2006) Design of track transitions. Research Results Digest 79, August.

Kerr AD ( 1987) A method for determining the track modulus using a locomotive or car on multi-axle trucks. American Railway Engineering Association 84: 270-286.

Kerr AD ( 1989) On the vertical modulus in the standard railway track analyses. Rail International 235(2): 37-45.

Kerr AD and Moroney BE ( 1993) Track transition problems and remedies. American Railway Engineering Association 742: 267-298.

Lei X. ( 2006) Influences of track transition due to the track rigidity abrupt change on track vibration. China Railway Science 27(5): 42-45.

Lei X. and Mao L. ( 2004) Dynamic response analyses of vehicle and track coupled system on track transition of conventional high speed railway. Journal of Sound and Vibration 271(3): 1133-1146.

Lei X. and Noda NA ( 2002) Analyses of dynamic response of vehicle and track coupling system with random irregularity of track vertical profile. Journal of Sound and Vibration 258(1): 147-165.

10.

Lei X. and Sheng X. ( 2006) Adνanced Studies in Modern Track Theory, (in Chinese) . Beijing, People’s Republic of China: China Railway Publishing House.

11.

Lei X. and Sun Z. ( 1999) Research on parameters of mechanical model for track structure of high speed railway. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 3(2): 29-37.

12.

Li D. and Davis D. ( 2005) Transition of railroad bridge approaches. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenνironmental Engineering 131(11): 1392-1398.

13.

Li D. , Rose J. , Lees H. and Davis D. ( 2001) Hot-mix asphalt trackbed performance evaluation at Alps, New Mexico. Technology Digest 01-015, April.

14.

Li D. , Smith L. , Doe B. , Otter D. and Uppal S. ( 2003) Study of bridge approach and track transition degradation-factors and mitigation. Federal Railroad Administration, Contract DTFR53-01-H-00305.

15.

Moroney BE ( 1991) A study of railroad track transition points and problems . Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Delaware.

16.

Rose JG ( 2000) Asphalt trackbeds: selection, design, installation practices, long-term performances and material properties. In: Proceedings of Railway Engineering-2000 Third International Conference and Exhibition, London, 5-6 July, pp.1-12.

17.

Rose JG and Hensley MJ ( 1991) Performance of hot mix asphalt railway trackbeds. Transportation Research Record 1300. Transportation Research Board.

18.

Sasaoka CD and Davis D. ( 2005) Implementing track transition solutions for heavy axle load service. In: Proceedings of the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) 2005 Annual Conference , Chicago, IL, 25-28 September, pp.83-97.

19.

Yang F. and Ghislain AF ( 1996) An iterative solution method for dynamic response of bridge-vehicles systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 25(1): 195-215.

20.

Zienkiewicz OC and Taylor RL ( 2000) The Finite Element Method, 5th edn. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann.