The Criminal Sentiments Scale (CSS) purports to measure attitudes and values pertaining to and in support of criminal conduct (Andrews & Bonta, 2003). A sample of 72 sex offenders treated in a high intensity sex offender program completed the CSS pre-and post-treatment and was followed up for approximately 3 years. The CSS demonstrated high internal consistency. Correlational and ROC analyses indicated that the CSS is a robust predictor of non-sexual violent and non-violent recidivism. The CSS also correlated significantly with the General Statistical Information on Recidivism Scale which assesses non-sexual recidivism risk. Similar analyses showed that the CSS did not predict sexual recidivism nor did it correlate with a tool that assesses sexual recidivism risk—the Static 99. The CSS scores changed significantly in the predicted direction following treatment. The present results suggest that the CSS is an internally consistent tool for the assessment of criminal sentiments among sex offenders and that it predicts non-sexual but not sexual recidivism.
Andrews, D.A. (1989). Recidivism is predictable and can be influenced: Using risk assessments to reduce recidivism. Forum on Corrections Research, 1(2), 11-17.
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems, Inc .
3.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
4.
Andrews, D.A., & Wormith, J.S. (1984). Criminal sentiments and criminal behavior. Ottawa, ON: Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada .
5.
Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F.T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology , 28(3), 369-465.
6.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New JerseyPrentice-Hall Inc.
7.
Barbaree, H.E., Seto, M.C., Langton, C.M., & Peacock, E.J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 28(4), 490-521.
8.
Bonta, J., Harman, W.G., Hann, R.G., & Cormier, R.B. (1996). The prediction of recidivism among federally sentenced offenders: A re-validation of the SIR scale. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 38, 61-79.
9.
Burt, M.R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217-230.
10.
Canadian Police Information Centre (n.d.). Retrieved October 18, 2004, from http://www.cpiccipc.ca/English/index.cfm
11.
Cialdini, R.B., Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1981). Attitude and attitude change . Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 357-404.
12.
Cormier, R.B. (1997). Yes, SIR! A stable risk prediction tool. Forum on Corrections Research, 9(1), 3-7.
13.
Gendreau, P., Grant, B.A., Leipciger, M., & Collins, S. (1979). Norms and recidivism for the MMPI and selected experimental scales on a Canadian delinquent sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 11(1), 21-31.
14.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology, 34(4), 575-596.
15.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussiere, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348-362.
16.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. (User Report 2004-02). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
17.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders. (User Report 1999-02). Ottawa, ON: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
18.
Hare, R.D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist - Revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
19.
Kahle, L.R., & Berman, J.J. (1979). Attitudes cause behaviors: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(3), 315-32 1.
20.
Kroner, D.G., & Mills, J.F. (1998). The structure of antisocial attitudes among violent and sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42(3), 246-257.
21.
Malamuth, N.M., & Check, J.V. (1983). Sexual arousal to rape depictions: Individual differences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92(1), 55-67.
22.
Marshall, W.L., Anderson, D., & Fernandez, Y. (1999). Cognitive behavioural treatment of sex offenders . Toronto, ON: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
23.
Mills, J.F., Anderson, D., & Kroner, D.G. (2004). The antisocial attitudes and associates of sex offenders. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 14, 134-145.
24.
Mills, J.F., & Kroner, D.G. (1997). The Criminal Sentiments Scale: Predictive validity in a sample of violent and sex offenders. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(4), 399-404.
25.
Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 62(4), 783-792.
26.
Nicholaichuk, T., Gordon, A., Gu, D., & Wong, S. (2000). Outcome of an institutional sex offender treatment program: A comparison between treated and matched untreated offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(2), 139-153.
27.
Rice, M.E., & Harris, G.T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 737-748.
28.
Shields, I.W., & Simourd, D.J. (1991). Predicting predatory behavior in a population of incarcerated young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 18(2), 180-194.
29.
Simourd, D.J. (1997). The Criminal Sentiments Scale—Modified and Pride in Delinquency Scale: Psychometric properties and construct validity of two measures of criminal attitudes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(1), 52-70.
30.
Simourd, D.J., & Olver, M.E. (2002). The future of criminal attitudes research and practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 427-446.
31.
Simourd, D.J., & van de Ven, J. (1999). Assessment of criminal attitudes: Criterion-related validity of the Criminal Sentiments Scale—Modified and Pride in Delinquency Scale. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 26(1), 90-106.
32.
Swets, J.A. (1986). Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostics tasks: Implications for theory and measurement of performance. Psychological Bulletin, 99(2), 181-198.
