The authors sought to examine the impact of notification and residence restriction statutes on sex offender reintegration. Although previous research has primarily sampled sex offenders receiving treatment, the authors examined the impact of these policies on a broad sample of registered sex offenders subject to notification via the Internet. Findings from a survey of 138 community sex offenders revealed that a high percentage perceived residence restriction and community notification legislation to negatively affect employment, housing, and social relations. Consistent with prior research in this area, these findings suggest that such policies might hamper offenders' efforts toward community reintegration, which ultimately could serve to inflate rates of recidivism. Directions for future research and implications for practice and policy evaluation are discussed.
Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, H.R. 4472, 109th Cong. (2006).
2.
Adkins, G., Huff, D., & Stageberg, P. (2000). The Iowa sex offender registry and recidivism . Des Moines: Iowa Department of Human Rights.
3.
Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J.S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7-27.
4.
Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. (2005). The registration and community notification of adult sex offenders. Retrieved March 15, 2008 from http://www.atsa.com/ppnotify.html
5.
Barnoski, R. (2005). Sex offender sentencing inWashington State: Notification levels and recidivism . Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
6.
Chajewski, M., & Mercado, C.C. (2008). An analysis of sex offender residency restrictions in Newark, New Jersey. Sex Offender Law Report, 9, 1-6.
7.
Colorado Department of Public Safety. (2004 ). Report on safety issues raised by living arrangements for and location of sex offenders in the community. Denver, CO: Sex Offender Management Board.
8.
Commonwealth v. Baker, et al., Case No. 07-M-00604 (4th Div., Kenton Dist. Ct., Ky. 2007).
9.
Doe v. Miller, 418 F.3d 950 (2005).
10.
Elwell v. Lower Township (Superior Court of New Jersey 2006).
11.
G.H. v. Galloway Township (Superior Court of New Jersey 2007).
12.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussière, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348-362.
13.
Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A.J.R. (1998). Dynamic predictors of sexual recidivism (No. 1998-01). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada .
14.
Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A.J.R. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13(2), 105-122.
15.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. Ottawa, Canada: Public Works and Government Services.
16.
Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17(1), 61-88.
17.
Laub, J.H., & Sampson, R.J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1-69.
18.
Lees, M., & Tewksbury, R. (2006). Understanding policy and programmatic issues regarding sex offender registries. Corrections Today, 68(1), 54.
19.
Levenson, J.S. (2007). Residence restrictions and their impact on sex offender reintegration, rehabilitation, and recidivism. ATSA Forum, 18(2).
20.
Levenson, J.S. (in press). Collateral consequences of sex offender residence restrictions . Criminal Justice Studies.
21.
Levenson, J.S., Brannon, Y., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007a). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 1-25.
22.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. (2005a). The effect of Megan's law on sex offender reintegration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49-66.
23.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. (2005b). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(2), 168-178.
24.
Levenson, J.S., & D'Amora, D.A. (2007). Social policies designed to prevent sexual violence: The emperor's new clothes? Criminal Justice Policy Review , 18(2), 168-199.
25.
Levenson, J.S., D'Amora, D.A., & Hern, A. (2007). Megan's law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 587-602.
26.
Levenson, J.S., & Hern, A. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community re-entry. Justice Research and Policy, 9(1), 59-73.
27.
Lowenkamp, C.T., & Latessa, E.J. (2004). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low-risk offenders (technical report) . In: Topics in community corrections (pp. 3-8). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
28.
Mann v. Georgia, 282 Ga. 754, 653 S.E.2d 740 (2007).
29.
Meredith, T., Speir, J., Johnson, S., & Hull, H. (2003). Enhancing parole decision-making through the automation of risk assessment. Atlanta, GA: Applied Research Services.
30.
Mikaloff v. Walsh (U.S. District Court Northern District of Ohio 2007).
31.
Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2003 ). Level three sex offenders residential placement issues. St. Paul: Author.
32.
Minnesota Department of Corrections. (2007 ). Residential proximity and sex offense recidivism in Minnesota . St. Paul: Author.
33.
Moroz, J., & Wood, S. (2006, October 19). NJ sues to end local sex offender residence laws. The Philadelphia Inquirer. Available at http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/mediasources/20061019a?OpenDocument
34.
Nieto, M., & Jung, D. (2006). The impact of residency restrictions on sex offenders and correctional management practices: A literature review. Sacramento: California Research Bureau.
35.
Schram, D., & Milloy, C. (1995). Community notification: A study of offender characteristics and recidivism (Report No. 95-10-1101). Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
36.
Schulenberg, J.L. (2007). Predicting noncompliant behavior: Disparities in the social locations of male and female probationers. Justice Research and Policy, 9(1), 25-57.
37.
Tewksbury, R. (2002). Validity and utility of the Kentucky sex offender registry. Federal Probation, 66, 21-26.
38.
Tewksbury, R. (2004). Experiences and attitudes of registered female sex offenders. Federal Probation, 68(3), 30-34.
39.
Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 67-82.
40.
Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M.B. (2006a). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community experiences. Sociological Spectrum , 26, 309-334.
41.
Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M.B. (2006b). Sex offenders on campus: University-based sex offender registries and the collateral consequences of registration. Federal Probation, 70, 50-63.
42.
Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M.B. (2007). Perceptions of punishment: How registered sex offenders view registries. Crime & Delinquency, 53, 380-407.
43.
Tewksbury, R., & Levenson, J.S. (2007). When evidence is ignored: Residential restrictions for sex offenders. Corrections Today , 69(6), 54-57.
44.
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E.E. (2006). Where to find sex offenders: An examination of residential locations and neighborhood conditions. Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 61-75.
45.
Walker, J.T., Golden, J.W., & VanHouten, A.C. (2001). The geographic link between sex offenders and potential victims: A routine activity approach. Justice Research and Policy, 3, 15-33.
46.
Walker, J.T., Maddan, S., Vasquez, B.E., VanHouten, A.C., & Ervin-McLarty, G. (2005). The influence of sex offender registration and notification laws in the United States. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www.acic.org/statistics/Research/SO_Report_Final.pdf
47.
Welchans, S. (2005). Megan's law: Evaluations of sexual offender registries . Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 123-140.
Zandbergen, P.A., & Hart, T.C. (2006). Reducing housing options for convicted sex offenders: Investigating the impact of residency restriction laws using GIS. Justice Research and Policy, 8(2), 1-24.
50.
Zevitz, R.G. (2006). Sex offender community notification: Its role in recidivism and offender reintegration. Criminal Justice Studies, 19(2), 193-208.
51.
Zevitz, R.G., & Farkas, M.A. (2000). Sex offender community notification: Managing high risk criminals or exacting further vengeance? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 375-391.
