Research on the causal factors underlying sex offender recidivism has not considered the success or failure of the reintegration process by which the offender rejoins the community after prison. The authors developed a coding protocol to measure the quality and comprehensiveness of reintegration planning for sex offenders. The protocol was retrospectively applied to groups of recidivists and nonrecidivists who were matched on static risk level and follow-up time. The protocol demonstrated adequate reliability. Compared to nonrecidivists, recidivists had significantly lower scores relating to accommodation, employment, and the Good Lives Model secondary goods, as well as lower total reintegration plan scores. ANCOVAs showed that when IQ and level of sexual deviance were controlled for, accommodation (a place to live) was significantly related to sexual recidivism and the Good Lives Model—secondary goods was significantly related to any recidivism. These results suggest that poor reintegration planning may be a risk factor for recidivism.
Allan, M., Grace, R., Rutherford, B., & Hudson, S. (2007). Psychometric assessment of dynamic risk factors for child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 347-367.
2.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3.
Beech, A.R., Fisher, D.D., & Thornton, D. (2003). Risk assessment of sex offenders. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 339-352.
4.
Bonta, J., & Andrews, D.A. (2003). A commentary on Ward and Stewart's model of human needs. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 215-218.
5.
Craissati, J., & Beech, A. (2003). A review of dynamic variables and their relationship to risk prediction in sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression , 9, 41-55.
6.
Ducro, C., & Pham, T. (2006). Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian sex offenders committed to a forensic facility. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 15-26.
7.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-608.
8.
Graffam, J., Shinkfield, A., Lavelle, B., & McPherson, W. (2004). Variables affecting successful reintegration as perceived by offenders and professionals. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40, 147-171.
9.
Haines, L. (2006, March 12). Freed predator abusers again. Herald on Sunday, p. 15.
10.
Hammett, T.M., Roberts, C., & Kennedy, S. (2001). Health-related issues in prisoner reentry. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 390-409.
11.
Hanson, R.K., & Bussiere, M.T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362.
12.
Hanson, R.K., & Harris, A.J.R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual assault recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35.
13.
Hanson, R.K., & Morton-Bourgon, K.E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163.
14.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Rep. 1999-02). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
15.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior , 24, 119-136.
16.
Harris, A., Phenix, A., Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. (2003). STATIC-99 coding rules revised-2003. Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada .
17.
Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., Lalumiere, M.L., Boer, D., & Lang, C. (2003). A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 413-425.
18.
Hepburn, J.R., & Griffin, M.L. (2004). The effect of social bonds on successful adjustment to probation: An event history analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 29, 46-75.
19.
Hudson, S., Wales, D., & Ward, T. (1998). Kia Marama: A treatment program for child molesters in New Zealand. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, S. Hudson & T. Ward (Eds.), Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders (pp. 17-28). New York: Plenum.
20.
Kruttschnitt, C., Uggen, C., & Shelton, K. (2000). Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: The interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Quarterly, 17, 61-87.
21.
Laub, J.H., & Sampson, R.J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. Crime and Justice, 28, 1-69.
22.
Laws, D.R. (1989). Relapse prevention with sex offenders. New York: Guilford.
23.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. (2005). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 168-178.
24.
Looman, J. (2006). Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 193-206.
25.
Lurigio, A.J., Rollins, A., & Fallon, J. (2004). The effects of serious mental illness on offender reentry. Federal Probation, 68, 45-52.
26.
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
Reynolds, C.R., Willson, V.L., & Clark, P.L. (1983). A four-test short form of the WAIS-R for clinical screening. Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 111-116.
28.
Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Schaefer, B.M., Friedlander, M.L., Blustein, D.L., & Maruna, S. (2004). The work lives of child molesters: A phenomenological perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 226-239.
30.
Seleznow, E. (2002). Time to work: Managing the employment of sex offenders under community supervision (Project of the Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice). Silver Springs, MD: Center for Sex Offender Management.
31.
Skelton, A., Riley, D., Wales, D., & Vess, J. (2006). Assessing risk for sexual offenders in New Zealand: Development and validation of a computer-scored risk measure. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12, 277-286.
32.
Sullivan, J., & Beech, A. (2002). Professional perpetrators: Sex offenders who use their employment to target and sexually abuse the children with whom they work. Child Abuse Review, 11, 153-167.
Taxman, F.S., Young, D., & Byrne, J.M. (2002). Offender's views of reentry: Implications for processes, programs and services. College Park: University of Maryland, Bureau of Governmental Research.
35.
Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The Good Lives Model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 243-257.
36.
Ward, T., Day, A., & Casey, S. (2006). Offender rehabilitation down under. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43, 73-83.
37.
Ward, T., & Gannon, T.A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive Good Lives Model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 77-94.
38.
Ward, T., & Mann, R. (2004). Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: A positive approach to treatment. In A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 598-616). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
39.
Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. London: Routledge.
40.
Ward, T., & Stewart, C.A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 34, 353-360.
41.
Ward, T., Vess, J., Collie, R.M., & Gannon, T.A. (2006). Risk management or goods promotion: The relationship between approach and avoidance goals in treatment for sex offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 378-393.
42.
Whitty, J.D. (2004). Briefing paper on NZPARS. Wellington: New Zealand Prisoners' Aid and Rehabilitation Society.
43.
Wilson, R.J., Huculak, B., & McWhinnie, A. (2002). Restorative justice innovations in Canada. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 363-380.
44.
Wilson, R.J., Picheca, J.E., & Prinzo, M. (2005). Circles of Support and accountability: An evaluation of the pilot project in south-central. OntarioCorrectional Service of Canada.
