Previous studies have reported low diagnostic agreement on the paraphilias, especially sexual sadism. In the present study, 34 evaluators throughout the United States reviewed summaries of 12 committed sex offenders. The evaluators agreed more than 90% of the time on whether offenders met criteria for any paraphilia in general and sexual sadism in particular. The authors attribute the low reliability reported in previous studies to different agreement indices, the amount and quality of information available to evaluators, and the prevalence of the respective paraphilic diagnoses in their samples.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/
3.
American Psychology-Law Society. (2008). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology (proposed 3rd draft). Southport, NC: Author. Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://www.ap-ls.org/links/22808sgfp.pdf
4.
Elwood, R.W. ( 1993). Psychological tests and clinical discriminations: Beginning to address the base rate problem. Clinical Psychology Review , 13, 409-419.
5.
Elwood, R.W., Doren, D.M., & Thornton, D. ( 2008). Diagnostic and risk profiles of men detained under Wisconsin’s sexually violent person law. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. Prepublished December 4, doi: 10.1177/0306624X08327305.
6.
Hanson, R.K. ( 1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism. Department of the Solicitor General of Canada. Retrieved August 28, 2008, from http://ww2.ps-sp.gc.ca/publications/corrections/199704_e.pdf
7.
Hanson, R.K., & Thornton, D. ( 2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U. S. (1997). Retrieved April 28, 2008, from http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_95_1649/
10.
Levenson, J.S. ( 2004). Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 357-368.
11.
Marshall, W.L. ( 2006). Diagnostic problems with sexual offenders. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez , L. E. Marshall, & G. A. Serran (Eds.), Sexual offender treatment: Controversial issues, 33-43. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley .
12.
Marshall, W.L., & Kennedy, P. ( 2003). Sexual sadism in sexual offenders: An elusive diagnosis . Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8, 1-22.
13.
Marshall, W.L., Kennedy, P., & Yates, P. ( 2002). Issues concerning the reliability and validity of the diagnosis of sexual sadism applied to prison settings. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14, 301-311.
14.
Marshall, W.L., Kennedy, P., Yates, P., & Serran, G. ( 2002). Diagnosing sexual sadism in sexual offenders: Reliability across diagnosticians. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 668-676.
15.
Nelson, K.P., & Edwards, D. ( 2008). On population-based measures of agreement for binary classifications. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 34, 411-426.
16.
Packard, R., & Levenson, J. ( 2006). Revisiting the reliability of diagnostic decisions in sex offender civil commitment. Sex Offender Treatment, 1(3). Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/50.html
17.
Spitzer, R.L., Endicott, J., & Robins, E. ( 1975). Clinical criteria for psychiatric diagnosis and DSM-III . American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 1187-1192.
18.
World Health Organization. (2008). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Retrieved September 12, 2008, from http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/index.htm?gf60.htm
