The authors engage ecological modernization and treadmill of production theories as well as the longstanding postmaterialist values hypothesis and the objective problems subjective values hypothesis to assess the effects of national level affluence, economic growth, and environmental degradation on the likelihood of environmental concern of individuals in 38 nations. Results of multilevel logistic regression analyses indicate that a higher level of national affluence lessens the likelihood of individual-level proenvironmental concern, whereas contrarily, economic development and growth in environmental degradation both increase the likelihood of such values. The authors conclude by considering the theoretical implications of the findings and outlining future steps in this research agenda.
Auyero, J., & Swistun, D.A. ( 2009). Flammable: Environmental suffering in an Argentine Shantytown . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
Beckerman, W. ( 1974). Two cheers for the affluent society. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
4.
Blocker, T.J., & Eckberg, D.L. ( 1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 General Social Survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 841-858.
5.
Brechin, S. ( 1999). Objective problems, subjective values, and global environmentalism: Evaluating the postmaterialist argument and challenging a new explanation . Social Science Quarterly, 80, 793-809.
6.
Brechin, S., & Kempton, W. ( 1997). Beyond postmaterialist values: National versus individual explanations of global environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly , 78, 16-20.
7.
Broad, R., & Cavanagh, J. ( 1993a). Beyond the myths of Rio: A new American agenda for the environment. World Policy Journal, 10, 65-72.
8.
Broad, R., & Cavanagh, J. ( 1993b). Plundering paradise: The struggle for the environment in the Philippines. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Catton, W.R. ( 2008). A retrospective view of my development as an environmental sociologist. Organization & Environment, 21, 471-477.
10.
Catton, W.R., & Dunlap, R.E. ( 1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. American Sociologist, 13, 41-49.
11.
Chatterjee, D.P. ( 2008). Oriental disadvantage versus occidental exuberance: Appraising environmental concern in India-a case study in local context. International Sociology, 23(5), 4-33.
12.
Dalton, R.J. ( 2005). The greening of the globe? Cross-national levels of environmental group membership. Environmental Politics, 14, 441-459.
13.
Davis, D. ( 2002). When smoke ran like water: Tales of environmental deception and the battle against pollution. New York, NY: Basic Books.
14.
Diekmann, A., & Franzen, A. ( 1999). The wealth of nations and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 31, 540-549.
15.
Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Stern, P. ( 2002). Gender, values, and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 353-364.
16.
Dunlap, R.E. ( 2008). Promoting a paradigm change: Reflections on early contributions to environmental sociology. Organization & Environment , 21, 478-487.
17.
Dunlap, R.E., & Mertig, A. ( 1997). Global environmental concern: An anomaly for postmaterialism . Social Science Quarterly, 78, 24-29.
18.
Dunlap, R.E., & York, R. ( 2008). The globalization of environmental concern and the limits of the postmaterialist values explanation: Evidence from four multinational surveys. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 529-563.
19.
Duroy, Q.M.H. ( 2008). Testing the affluence hypothesis: A cross-cultural analysis of the determinants of environmental action. The Social Science Journal, 45, 419-439.
20.
Franzen, A. ( 2003). Environmental attitudes in international comparison: An analysis of the ISSP Surveys 1993 and 2000. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 297-308.
21.
Gelissen, J. ( 2007). Explaining popular support for environmental protection: A multilevel analysis of 50 nations. Environment and Behavior , 39, 392-415.
22.
Gould, K.A., Pellow, D.N., & Schaniberg, A. (2004). Interrogating the treadmill of production. Organization Environment, 17, 296-316.
23.
Guha, R. ( 1999). Environmentalism: A global history. Menlo Park, CA: Longman.
24.
Guha, R., & Martinez-Alier, J. (1997). Varieties of environmentalism: Essays North and South. London, England: Earthscan.
25.
Haller, M., & Hadler, M. ( 2008). Dispositions to act in favor of the environment: Fatalism and readiness to make sacrifices in a cross-national perspective. Sociological Forum, 23, 281-311.
26.
Hardin, G. ( 1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 163, 1243-1248.
27.
Hobsbawm, E. ( 1994). The age of extremes. London, England: Michael Joseph.
28.
Hornborg, A. ( 1998). Towards an ecological theory of unequal exchange: Articulating world system theory and ecological economics. Ecological Economics , 25, 127-136.
29.
Huber, J. ( 2000). Toward industrial ecology: Sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 2, 269-285.
30.
Hunter, L.M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. ( 2004). Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors . Social Science Quarterly, 85, 677-694.
31.
Inglehart, R. ( 1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Inglehart, R. ( 1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
Inglehart, R. ( 1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. Political Science and Politics, 8, 57-72.
34.
Inglehart, R. ( 1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Jahn, D. ( 1998). Environmental performance and policy regimes: Explaining variations in 18 OECD countries. Policy Sciences, 31, 107-131.
36.
Jorgenson, A.K. ( 2003). Consumption and environmental degradation: A cross-national analysis of the ecological footprint. Social Problems, 50, 374-394.
37.
Jorgenson, A.K. ( 2006). Global warming and the neglected greenhouse gas: A cross-national study of methane emissions intensity, 1995. Social Forces, 84, 1777-1796.
38.
Jorgenson, A.K. ( 2007). Does foreign investment harm the air we breathe and the water we drink? A cross-national study of carbon dioxide emissions and organic water pollution in less-developed countries, 1975-2000. Organization & Environment, 20, 137-156.
39.
Jorgenson, A.K. ( 2009). The transnational organization of production, the scale of degradation, and ecoefficiency: A study of carbon dioxide emissions in less-developed countries. Human Ecology Review, 16, 64-74.
40.
Jorgenson, A.K., & Burns, T. ( 2007). The political-economic causes of change in the ecological footprints of nations, 1991-2001: A quantitative investigation. Social Science Research, 36, 834-853.
41.
Jorgenson, A.K., & Clark, B. ( 2009). The economy, military, and ecologically unequal relationships in comparative perspective: A panel study of the ecological footprints of nations, 1975-2000. Social Problems, 56, 621-646.
42.
Kemmelmeier, M., Krol, G., & Kim, Y.H. ( 2002). Values, economics, and proenvironmental attitudes in 22 societies. Cross-Cultural Research, 36, 256-285.
43.
Kidd, Q., & Lee, A.-R. (1997). Postmaterialist values and the environment: A critique and reappraisal. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 1-15.
44.
Lewis, T. ( 2008). Environmental movements in the Global South. In K. Gould & T. Lewis (Eds.), Twenty lessons in environmental sociology (pp. 244-254). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
Mol, A. ( 2001). Globalization and environmental reform. Cambridge: MIT Press.
46.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. ( 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
47.
Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., Cheong, Y.F., Congdon, R., & du Toit, M. ( 2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.
48.
Rice, J. ( 2007). Ecological unequal exchange: International trade and uneven utilization of environmental space in the world system. Social Forces, 85, 1369-1392.
49.
Roberts, J.T., & Parks, B.C. ( 2007). A climate of injustice: Global inequality, North-South politics, and climate policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
50.
Rosa, E., York, R., & Dietz, T. ( 2004). Tracking the anthropogenic drivers of ecological impacts . Ambio, 33, 509-512.
51.
Schnaiberg, A. ( 1980). The environment: From surplus to scarcity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52.
Shandra, J.M., London, B., Whooley, O.P., & Williamson, J.B. (2004). International nongovernmental organizations and carbon dioxide emissions in the developing world: A quantitative, cross-national analysis. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 520-545.
53.
Shandra, J.M., Shor, E., Maynard, G., & London, B. ( 2008). Debt, structural adjustment, and deforestation: A cross-national study. Journal of World-Systems Research, 14, 1-21.
54.
Spaargaren, G., & Mol, A.P.J. (1992). Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society and Natural Resources, 5, 323-344.
55.
Torgler, B., & Garcia-Valinas, M.A. (2006). The determinants of individuals’ attitudes towards preventing environmental damage. Ecological Economics, 63, 536-552.
56.
World Bank. (2010). World development indicators. Retrieved from www.worldbank.org
57.
World Resources Institute. (2010). EarthTrends. Retrieved from http://earthtrends.wri.org/
58.
World Values Surveys. (1995, 2000, 2005). Retrieved from www.worldvaluessurvey.org
59.
York, R. ( 2004). The treadmill of (diversifying) production. Organization and Environment, 17, 355-362.
60.
York, R. ( 2008). De-carbonization in former Soviet Republics, 1992-2000: The ecological consequences of de-modernization. Social Problems , 55, 370-390.
61.
York, R., & Rosa, E.A. ( 2003). Key challenges to ecological modernization theory. Organization and Environment, 16, 273-288.
62.
York, R., Rosa, E.A., & Dietz, T. ( 2003). Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68, 279-300.
63.
Zahran, S., Kim, E., Chen, X., & Lubell, M. ( 2007). Ecological development and global climate change: A cross-national study of Kyoto Protocol ratification. Society and Natural Resources, 20, 37-55.
