Protein Aggregation and Soluble Aggregate Formation Screened by a Fast Microdialysis Assay

Introduction

The conformational quality of recombinant proteins is an important matter of concern as it might dramatically influence the results of interactomic assays and other kinds of proteomic studies. ¹ Despite the development of useful prospective algorithms, ^2,3 the aggregation tendency of polypeptides obtained by recombinant DNA procedures remains uncertain before production. In addition, protein misfolding and aggregation are observed in all the microorganisms used for recombinant protein production. ⁴ Bacteria, the most common protein production platform, often yields recombinant polypeptides totally or partially deposited as inclusion bodies. ⁵ Although recent studies have shown that inclusion bodies might contain functional protein species suitable for in situ enzymatic reactions, ^6-12 protein production processes are in general aimed at soluble species. Therefore, inclusion bodies are separated by differential sedimentation and further discarded. However, protein species occurring in the soluble cell fraction can form soluble aggregates ¹¹ —namely, oligomeric protein clusters with globular and fibril-like morphologies. ^13,14 The formation of these structures, historically neglected, might compromise the average quality and biological activity of the soluble protein species. ^11,14 Because of the small size of soluble aggregates, ^13,14 their formation is unperceived and commonly unsuspected. Also, no quality controls are routinely applied in the context of recombinant protein production to monitor the conformational quality of the soluble protein fraction.

We have developed a methodologically simple analytical procedure that qualitatively determines the aggregation tendency of a given protein. Because intriguingly, protein deposition correlates with the size of soluble aggregates, we propose microdialysis as a routine screening method of both protein solubility and conformational quality of the soluble version under different experimental conditions.

Materials and Methods

Microdialysis

Several drops (20 µL each) of model proteins at 0.1 mg/mL in elution buffer were deposited on VSWP02500 Millipore (Billerica, MA) membrane filters floating on 25 mL of each buffer described in Table 1 for 30 min. Dialyzed drops were collected and centrifuged, and the soluble fractions were used in dynamic light-scattering (DLS) analysis.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 1.

Summary of R9-GFP-H6 Aggregation Data upon Dialysis in Front of Different Buffers

Buffer Number	Buffer Composition	Aggregated Fraction, %	Peaks of Size Distribution, nm (% of Soluble Aggregates in the Total Soluble Population)	Polydispersion Index (DLS)	Fluorescence Units a,b	Densitometric Units a (Coomassie Blue Staining)	Densitometric units a (Ponceau Staining)
1	20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 + 5% dextrose	0	32.6 (100)	0.203	553,543	267	0.69
2	PBS pH 7.4 + 10% glycerol	25.3	23.9 (100)	0.139	1,191,785	288	0.83
3	10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 + 0.01% Tween-20	14.7	23.0 (100)	0.158	547,267	282	0.63
4	HBS buffer pH 5.8	77.7	21.0 (99.2) 105.5 (0.8)	0.365	1,012,949	283	0.75
5	20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 + 5% dextrose + 200 mM NaCl	61.5	23.0 (99.6) 137.0 (0.4)	0.242	1,476,738	300	0.74
6	10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 + 0.01% Tween-20 + 200 mM NaCl	93.7	24.3 (99.9) 220.2 (0.1)	0.206	1,653,812	320	0.78
7	20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl + 250 mM imidazole (elution buffer)	100	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA

PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; HBS, HEPES-buffered saline; NA, not applicable.

a

As determined on the filters’ surfaces.

b

One representative experiment is shown. The standard errors when comparing replicas were <0.76% of the mean for fluorescence determination, <0.24% for protein determination through Comassie blue staining, and <1.12% for Ponceau staining.

Results and Discussion

In our routine laboratory practice, we had commonly noted protein deposition on membrane filters when performing drop microdialysis, and we wondered if this fact could be related with the extent of protein aggregation in a given buffer. To evaluate this possibility, we explored the potential connection between protein deposition and aggregation by using an aggregation-prone fluorescent protein (R9-GFP-H6) as a model. For that, upon production in E. coli, drops of freshly purified R9-GFP-H6 were microdialyzed ( Fig. 1A ) against 6 different buffers commonly used for protein storage and handling ( Table 1 ). The dialyzed material was centrifuged at 14,841 g, and the protein remaining in the soluble fraction was quantified to determine the extent of aggregation, which ranged from undetectable levels to essentially 100% of the total protein ( Table 1 ). This indicated that buffer composition dramatically influences R9-GFP-H6 solubility in an extremely wide range and pointed out buffer selection as a critical issue regarding solubility of aggregation-prone proteins. Interestingly, the low-salt buffers 1 and 3 were the most convenient to keep R9-GFP-H6 in a soluble status.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Fig. 1.

(A) Schematic representation of the microdialysis procedure, shown as a sequential pattern. The soluble protein present in the dialyzed samples (ds) was analyzed by dynamic light scattering for comparison with fluorescence emission and protein amounts determined on the filters ( Table 2 ). (B) Images of microdialysis membranes showing the deposited R9-GFP-H6 protein dissolved in 3 different buffers (namely 1, 4, and 6; see Table 1 for composition). Six replicas were processed in each filter. In V, direct visualization of untreated filters; in CBS, pictures of filter sections after Coomassie blue staining; in DU (densitometric units), smaller sections of the same stained filters processed through the Quantity One image software.

To test the value of microdialysis as a convenient screening method for protein aggregation, we determined the amounts of R9-GFP-H6 protein deposited on the membrane dialysis indirectly by fluorescence emission and directly by Coomassie blue and Ponceau staining methods ( Fig. 1A ). The visual appearance of the unstained and stained membranes was highly consistent in different aliquots of the same protein sample but dissimilar when comparing different buffers ( Fig. 1B ). Fluorescence emission and Coomassie blue staining values correlated, at acceptable levels of confidence, with the fraction of insoluble R9-GFP-H6 (p = 0.0518 and p = 0.0576, respectively) found in the respective buffers ( Table 2 ). In fact, fluorescence emission and Coomassie blue staining data evolved in parallel in different samples showing a good lineal correlation between them (p = 0.0136; not shown). This indicated a sufficient robustness in the determination of protein amounts deposited on the filters. However, protein amounts determined by Ponceau staining were less reliable as indicators of protein aggregation (p = 0.3521; Table 2 ), indicating that in our hands, Ponceau measurements are less quantitative regarding protein amounts.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 2.

Correlation between the Percent of Aggregation of 3 Different Proteins (Expressed as p Values from a Regression Analysis) Dissolved in Different Buffers and the Protein Amounts on Membranes Determined by Alternative Procedures upon Microdialysis

	Densitometric Units (Coomassie Blue Staining)	Fluorescence Units	Densitometric Units (Ponceau Staining)	Small Particle Size	Large Particle Size
R9-GFP-H6	0.0576*	0.0518*	0.3521	0.2094	0.0086***
NLSCtHis	0.0113**	ND	ND	ND	0.0395**
Bovine serum albumin (BSA)	0.0418**	ND	ND	ND	ND

The size of soluble aggregates found in these buffers is also included in the analysis.

Confidence intervals are *< 90%, **< 95%, and ***< 99%. n = 6 for R9-GFP-H6 and NLsCt-His; n = 5 for BSA. ND, not determined.

The good correlation between protein amounts deposited on the filters (determined by Coomassie blue staining) and the aggregation propensity was confirmed by using 2 additional (nonfluorescent) proteins structurally differing from green fluorescent protein (GFP)—namely, the extensively engineered E. coli β-galactosidase NLSCtHis, an structurally complex tetrameric protein (p = 0.0113), and a wild-type commercial BSA, an essentially soluble protein (p = 0.0418; Table 2 ). This fact prompts consideration of microdialysis as a reliable method for the fast screening of protein solubility, as its applicability is irrespective of the nature of the tested protein.

At this stage, we wondered if the occurrence of macroscopic aggregation could be linked to the formation of soluble aggregates, a possibility that, as far as we know, had not been explored so far. In this regard, we explored by DLS the eventual presence of soluble R9-GFP-H6 and NLSCtHis oligomers and their size. Solutions of R9-GFP-H6 recurrently showed major peaks at between 20 and 30 nm and, in some cases, microaggregates of between 100 and 250 nm ( Fig. 2A ). Although sizes of the smaller R9-GFP-H6 particles did not correlate with the extent of protein aggregation (p = 0.2094; Table 2 ), the sizes of the large particle population (>100 nm) showed good correlation with the extent of R9-GFP-H6 in the insoluble fraction (p = 0.0086; Table 2 ) and therefore also with Coomassie blue staining and fluorescence emission data (p = 0.0212 and p = 0.0422, respectively; not shown). The prevalence of the 20- to 30-nm particles is due to a self-organized clustering of R9-GFP-H6 driven by the hanging R9 peptides, ¹⁸ whereas the larger particles seem to represent an evolving population of protoaggregates.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Fig. 2.

Aggregate size distributions of soluble (A) R9-GFP-H6 and (B) NLSCtHis in different buffers ( Table 1 ) measured by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Plots obtained in buffers 1 (red), 4 (green), and 6 (blue) are shown as representative examples.

On the other hand, soluble NLSCtHis peaks at around 15 nm, the size of the β-galactosidase tetramer ( Fig. 2B ). Larger particles of between 100 and 1000 nm are observed in some buffers ( Fig. 2B ), their size showing good correlation with the extent of protein aggregation (p = 0.0395; Table 2 ). The coincidence between size of soluble aggregates and the extent of insoluble protein aggregation suggests that the soluble supramolecular entities are intermediates in the protein aggregation process, leading to protein deposition as insoluble protein clusters.

In the context of the growing concerns about recombinant protein quality, ^1,19 simple analytical approaches for the routine screening of protein aggregation tendency would be highly convenient. As the performance of microdialysis and further protein determination represented around 90 min in full, and these simple procedures can be applied in parallel to a high number of samples, microdialysis is proposed here as a novel high-throughput, simple, and fast prospective method appropriate for the comparative screening and monitoring of protein aggregation tendency and, indirectly, of the conformational quality of the residual population of soluble protein represented by the occurrence of soluble aggregates. ¹⁴