The Public Services Transformation in Enhancing Communities Welfare in Bandung City

Abstract

Purpose: Public service transformation is pivotal for enhancing urban community welfare. Through innovative strategies, technology, and community engagement, this effort aims to deliver services that are more efficient, responsive, and aligned with community needs. Method: Employs quantitative methods, utilizing Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), to explore the dimensions and potential impacts of this transformational journey. Finding: The study on public service transformation in Bandung City highlights the significance of enhancing community welfare through improved quality of life, increased public satisfaction, and strengthened government trust. The transformation has improved access to services, reduced complaints, and boosted public perception of service quality. Emphasis on transparency, accountability, and data security has fostered public trust. The government’s success in meeting community needs underscores the importance of public service transformation in promoting shared prosperity.

Keywords

public service transformation quality of life public satisfaction public trust government

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aaroe

Baekgaard

Christensen

Moynihan

D. P.

(2021). Personality and public administration: Policymaker tolerance of administrative burdens in welfare services. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13381

Abhijat

Pathak

(2023). Mobility and choices in urban housing. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 14(1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/09754253231161022

Amalda

Magriasti

(2023). Integration analysis of community satisfaction and customer satisfaction index in Padang public service mall. Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 15(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.20473/jap.v15i1.46148

Avianto

B. N.

Ismowati

Amelia

(2022). Implementation E-government in supporting of online-based service quality and accessibility. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 2(5), 729–742. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v2i05.317

Aziz

Y. M. A.

Ariesmansyah

(2023). E-governance: The implication of next social generation welfare information system. Smart City, 3(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.56940/sc.v3.i2.4

Baimenov

Liverakos

(2022). Public Service Evolution in the 15 Post-Soviet Countries: Diversity in Transformation. Public Service Evolution in the 15 Post-Soviet Countries: Diversity in Transformation (pp. 1-579). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2462-9

Bason

(2024). Leading Public Sector Innovation. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447336259

Beshi

T. D.

Kaur

(2020). Public trust in local government: Explaining the role of good governance practices. Public Organization Review, 20(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00444-6

Fife

(2019). Quantitative literature synthesis: An A priori method for synthesizing past and future data. In Proceedings of the 2019 AERA annual meeting. Washington, DC: AERA. https://doi.org/10.3102/1440432

10.

Gallouj

(2023). Public service innovation networks (PSINs). Elgar encyclopedia of services. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802202595.public.service.innovation

11.

Hair

Alamer

(2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027

12.

Jameel

Asif

Hussain

(2019). Good governance and public trust: Assessing the mediating effect of E-government in Pakistan. Lex Localis, 17(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.4335/17.2.299-320(2019)

13.

Kearney

J. D.

Merrill

T. W.

(2021). The transformation of the public trust doctrine. In Lakefront (pp. 244–280). Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501754654.003.0009

14.

Kirby

Knox

Pinch

(2017). Public service provision and urban development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315168777

15.

Kraus

Jones

Kailer

Weinmann

Chaparro-Banegas

Roig-Tierno

(2021). Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. Sage Open, 11(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576

16.

Kusmayadi

(2022). The role of public service quality in increasing satisfaction to realize community welfare. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 12(1), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.12.01.2022.p12135

17.

Larsson

Teigland

(2019). Digital transformation and public services. In Digital transformation and public services. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429319297

18.

Larsson

K. K.

Skjølsvik

(2021). Making sense of the digital co-production of welfare services: Using digital technology to simplify or tailor the co-production of services. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1169–1186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2010402

19.

Latupeiriss

J. J. P.

Dewi

N. L. Y.

Prayana

I. K. R.

Srikandi

M. B.

Ramadiansyah

S. A.

Pramana

I. B. G. A. Y.

(2024). Transforming Public Service Delivery: A Comprehensive Review og Digitizatin Initatives. Sustainability, 16(7), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072818

20.

Lips

(2024). Digital transformation in the public sector. In Collaborating for digital transformation, (Book-Chapter: 13-30). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803923895.00010

21.

Magno

Cassia

Ringle

C. M.

(2024). A brief review of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) use in quality management studies. TQM Journal, 36(5), 1242–1251. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2022-0197

22.

Manzoor

(2014). A look at efficiency in public administration: Past and future. Sage Open, 4(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014564936

23.

Mappatoba

(2023). Revitalizing public services: Addressing challenges and enhancing satisfaction (a study of public services in Palu city). International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 1(11), 1401–1414. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsmr.v1i11.7047

24.

Martín-Díaz

(2021). The urban transformation of Sarajevo. In The urban book series, ISSN 2365-757X. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80575-3

25.

Navarro

F. M.

(2016). Citizens and local government management innovations. Implementation of the New Public Service (NPS) in Municipal Institute Family, Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32091-5_8

26.

Novianto

(2023). Systematic literature review: Models of digital transformation in the public sector. Policy & Governance Review, 7(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v7i2.753

27.

O’Grady

(2022). The transformation of British welfare policy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898890.001.0001

28.

Popescu

(2023). Digital transformation and technological innovation in contemporary society. Scientific Bulletin, 28(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsaft-2023-0011

29.

Prayitno

(2023). Technological innovation in public administration transformation: Case study of e-government implementation in Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 8(4), 628–642. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v8i4.23017

30.

Randma-Liiv

Pesti

Sarapuu

(2022). Public Service Development in Estonia: From Patronage to Meritocracy. Springer Books. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2462-9_5

31.

Sarstedt

Hair

J. F.

Pick

Liengaard

B. D.

Radomir

Ringle

C. M.

(2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology and Marketing, 39(5), 1035–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21640

32.

Savitri

Cahyarini

B. R.

Ahad

M. P. Y.

Firmansyah

Gusparirin

Samsara

(2023). Indonesian public service innovation trends: An analysis based on public service innovation competition top innovations 2014–2019. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i5.12995

33.

Shaker

R. W.

El - Fatah

Z. F. A.

El- Baset

W. F. A.

(2023). The impact of digital transformation on technology centers in local units on the efficiency of services provided to the public to reach sustainable cities and communities. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 52(6), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.21608/jes.2023.208391.1516

34.

Shittu

A. K.

(2022). Public service and service delivery. In Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 10986–10994). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3_4005

35.

Shiyovych

S. Y.

(2023). Impact of digital transformation on public services: Experience of the European union. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 1(6), 539–543. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.06.94

36.

Shostak

(2023). The impact of digital transformation on the economy: Technological innovation and efficiency. Economic Affairs, 68(4), 2081–2093. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.4.2023.19

37.

Silitonga

M. S.

(2023). The public sector’s digital skills gap in Indonesia: The challenges and opportunities. Good Governance, 19(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.32834/gg.v19i1.585

38.

Suherlan

(2023). Digital technology transformation in enhancing public participation in democratic processes. Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT), 1(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.61100/tacit.v1i1.34

39.

Susilawati

(2023). Optimizing public services in the digital society in Indonesia, Jurnal Aktor, 2(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.26858/aktor.v2i2.46868. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/Aktor/article/view/46868

40.

Taufik

(2023). Integrated digital public service transformation: A government main application in Makassar city. In KnE social sciences. Knowledge E DMCC. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i17.14100

41.

Thomas

(2020). Convergence and digital fusion lead to competitive differentiation. Business Process Management Journal, 26(3), 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-01-2019-0001

42.

Walpole

Bacon

Beverley

De Laurentis

Renfrew

Rudd

(2022). New development: Enhancing regional innovation capabilities through formal public service communities of practice. Public Money & Management, 42(8), 668–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.2021658

43.

Yang

(2020). Urban community service and public space construction. In Understanding China (pp. 171–187). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7082-7_9

44.

Zanfei

(2023). Public service innovation. Book chapter: Elgar encyclopedia of services (p. 754). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802202595.public.service

45.

Zokaei

Seddon

O'Donovan

(2010). Systems thinking: From heresy to practice: Public and private sector studies. Systems Thinking: From Heresy to Practice: Public and Private Sector Studies. (pp. 1–282). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057.9780230299221

46.

Zvoushe

(2024). Social economic transformation in a dynamic world. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v12i1.808

47.

Creative Cities Network: Bandung . (2017, Maret 25). UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/creative-cities/bandung