A Nonparametric Imputation Approach for Dealing With Missing Variables in SHR Data

Abstract

Despite the considerable percentage of homicides recorded in the Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) that have missing information, there is no standard approach used by researchers to adjust homicide rates to accommodate missing data. Yet, rates that are defined on the basis of offender characteristics or victim-offender relationship will be severely underestimated if no adjustments, or imputations, are made. Several approaches to imputation of SHR data have been described in the literature. This research note describes an imputation strategy that appears to offer a viable alternative approach, although further development and testing of this and other techniques are needed before an optimal strategy can be determined.

Keywords

Supplementary Homicide Reports missing data imputation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, T. , & Buckner, T. (1997). A graphical approach to analyzing relationships between offenders and victims using the Supplementary Homicide Reports. Homicide Studies, 1, 129-140.

Flewelling, R. L. (1996). Exploring the recent surge in youth homicide rates: Geographic variations. In Proceedings of the 1996 Meeting of the Homicide Research Working Group. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

Flewelling, R. L. (1997a, April 24-25). Issues of non-reporting agencies and missing data in the Supplemental Homicide Report. Presented at the Workshop on UCR Imputation Procedures, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Flewelling, R. L. (1997b, November). Recent trends in youth homicide perpetration: An exploratory analysis of underlying trends and geographic variability. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology.

Flewelling, R. L. , & Williams, K. R. (1999). Categorizing homicides: The use of disaggregated data in homicide research. In D. Smith & M. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide studies: A sourcebook of social research (pp. 96-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fox, J. A. (1997, April 24-25). Missing data problems in the Supplementary Homicide Reports: An offender imputation strategy based on victim characteristics. Paper presented at the Workshop on UCR Imputation Procedures, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Fox, J. A. (2001). Uniform Crime Reports: Supplementary Homicide Reports, 1976-1999 (ICPSR Version) [Data file]. Boston: Northeastern University, College of Criminal Justice [Producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributor].

Langford, L. , Isaac, N. ,& Kabat, S. (1998). Homicides related to intimate partner violence in Massachusetts: Examining case ascertainment and validity of the SHR. Homicide Studies, 2, 353-277.

Messner, S. F. , Deane, G. ,& Beaulieu, M. (2002). Alog-multiplicative association model for allocating homicides with unknown victim-offender relationships. Criminology, 40, 457-480.

10.

!!Regoeczi, W. C. ,& Miethe, T. D. (2003). Talking on the unknown: Aqualitative comparative analysis of unknown relationship homicides. Homicide Studies, 7, 211-234.

11.

Regoeczi, W. C. , & Riedel, M. (2003). The application of missing data estimation models to the problem of unknown victim/offender relationships in homicide cases. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 155-183.

12.

Williams, K. R. , & Flewelling, R. L. (1987). Family, acquaintance, and stranger homicide: Alternative procedures for rate calculations. Criminology, 25, 543-560.