The authors investigate subjective well-being in the context of e-sports (competitive video games). They adopt the theoretical lenses of virtual edgework theory, a recent adaptation of edgework theory from physical to digital contexts. Sports have long been used as a tool to improve subjective well-being. The research question is whether e-sports lead to well-being, as their physical sport counterparts do, and through what psychological mechanisms. The authors answer through a conceptual model of moderated mediation tested on hundreds of e-sports players. They also address the role of privacy concerns, as e-sports pose several potential threats to players’ privacy that could hinder players’ achievement of well-being. Findings suggest that virtual edgework provides a useful theoretical perspective for understanding consumers’ behavior in digital environments. They also show that e-sports can lead to well-being by achieving feelings of self-enhancement under the positive moderation of perceived control over the digital environment and the negative moderation of privacy concerns.
AbbasB.K.JasimI.A.NsaifW.S. (2019), “A Comparative Study of the Growth of Electronic Sports in the World and the Important Global E-Sports Achievements,” International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 8 (1), 144–53.
2.
AboulnasrK.TranG.A.ParkT. (2022), “Personal Information Disclosure on Social Networking Sites,” Psychology & Marketing, 39 (2), 294–308.
3.
AbrahamA.D.NeveK.A.LattalK.M. (2013), “Dopamine and Extinction: A Convergence of Theory with Fear and Reward Circuitry,” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 108, 65–77.
4.
AbrahamM.NiessenC.SchnabelC.LorekK.GrimmV.MösleinK., et al. (2019), “Electronic Monitoring at Work: The Role of Attitudes, Functions, and Perceived Control for the Acceptance of Tracking Technologies,” Human Resource Management Journal, 29 (4), 657–75.
5.
AllensteinU.GediehnO.LehmannS.SingerD. (2020), “Esports and the Next Frontier of Brand Sponsorships,” McKinsey & Company (July 31), https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/e-sports-and-the-next-frontier-of-brand-sponsorships.
6.
AnglimJ.HorwoodS.SmillieL.D.MarreroR.J.WoodJ.K. (2020), “Predicting Psychological and Subjective Well-Being from Personality: A Meta-Analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, 146 (4), 279.
7.
BandaraR.FernandoM.AkterS. (2020), “Explicating the Privacy Paradox: A Qualitative Inquiry of Online Shopping Consumers,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101947.
8.
BányaiF.GriffithsM.D.KirályO.DemetrovicsZ. (2019), “The Psychology of Esports: A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Gambling Studies, 35 (2), 351–65.
9.
BertschyM.MühlbacherH.DesbordesM. (2020), “Esports Extension of a Football Brand: Stakeholder Co-Creation in Action?” European Sport Management Quarterly, 20 (1), 47–68.
10.
BöffelC.WürgerS.MüsselerJ.SchlittmeierS.J. (2022), “Character Customization with Cosmetic Microtransactions in Games: Subjective Experience and Objective Performance,” Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 770139.
BrymerE.Houge MackenzieS. (2016), “Psychology and the Extreme Sport Experience,” in Extreme Sports Medicine, FelettiF., ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 3–13.
13.
BrymerE.SchweitzerR.D. (2017), “Evoking the Ineffable: The Phenomenology of Extreme Sports,” Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4 (1), 63–74.
CavazzaM.LugrinJ.-L.BuehnerM. (2007), “Causal Perception in Virtual Reality and Its Implications for Presence Factors,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 16 (6), 623–42.
16.
ChenF.F.JingY.HayesA.LeeJ.M. (2013), “Two Concepts or Two Approaches? A Bifactor Analysis of Psychological and Subjective Well-Being,” Journal of Happiness Studies, 14 (3), 1033–68.
17.
ChenV.H.H.WilhelmC.JoeckelS. (2019), “Relating Video Game Exposure, Sensation Seeking, Aggression and Socioeconomic Factors to School Performance,” Behaviour and Information Technology, 39 (9), 957–69.
18.
Chicchi GiglioliI.A.de Juan RipollC.ParraE.Alcañiz RayaM. (2021), “Are 3D Virtual Environments Better Than 2D Interfaces in Serious Games Performance? An Explorative Study for the Assessment of Executive Functions,” Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 28 (2), 148–57.
19.
CohenR.BaluchB.DuffyL.J. (2018), “Defining Extreme Sport: Conceptions and Misconceptions,” Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1974.
20.
CranmerE.E.HanD.I.D.van GisbergenM.JungT. (2021), “Esports Matrix: Structuring the Esports Research Agenda,” Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 106671.
21.
Cuesta-ValiñoP.Gutiérrez-RodríguezP.Loranca-ValleC. (2022), “Sponsorship Image and Value Creation in E-Sports,” Journal of Business Research, 145, 198–209.
22.
CunninghamG.B.FairleyS.FerkinsL.KerwinS.LockD.ShawS., et al. (2018), “eSport: Construct Specifications and Implications for Sport Management,” Sport Management Review, 21 (1), 1–6.
23.
DienerE.WirtzD.Biswas-DienerR.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD., et al. (2009), “New Measures of Well-Being,” in Assessing Well-Being, DienerE., ed. Springer, 247–66.
24.
DufnerM.GebauerJ.E.SedikidesC.DenissenJ.J.A. (2019), “Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23 (1), 48–72.
ESTNN (2019), “Esports News Brief: March 20-27, 2019,” https://estnn.com/estnn-esports-news-brief-march-20-27-2019/.
27.
FarmanJ. (2010), “Hypermediating the Game Interface: The Alienation Effect in Violent Videogames and the Problem of Serious Play,” Communication Quarterly, 58 (1), 96–109.
28.
FelnhoferA.KothgassnerO.D.SchmidtM.HeinzleA.-K.BeutlL.HlavacsH., et al. (2015), “Is Virtual Reality Emotionally Arousing? Investigating Five Emotion Inducing Virtual Park Scenarios,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 82, 48–56.
29.
FunkD.C.PizzoA.D.BakerB.J. (2018), “eSport Management: Embracing eSport Education and Research Opportunities,” Sport Management Review, 21 (1), 7–13.
30.
GallagherM.W.LopezS.J.PreacherK.J. (2009), “The Hierarchical Structure of Well-Being,” Journal of Personality, 77 (4), 1025–50.
31.
GranicI.LobelA.EngelsR.C.M.E. (2014), “The Benefits of Playing Video Games,” American Psychologist, 69 (1), 66–78.
32.
GriffithsM. (1999), “Violent Video Games and Aggression,” Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4 (2), 203–12.
33.
GriffithsM.D. (2017), “The Psychosocial Impact of Professional Gambling, Professional Video Gaming & ESports,” Casino & Gaming International, 28, 59–63.
HalbrookY.J.O’DonnellA.T.MsetfiR.M. (2019), “When and How Video Games Can Be Good: A Review of the Positive Effects of Video Games on Well-Being,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14 (6), 1096–104.
36.
HallmannK.GielT. (2018), “eSports—Competitive Sports or Recreational Activity?” Sport Management Review, 21 (1), 14–20.
37.
HamariJ.SjöblomM. (2017), “What Is eSports and Why Do People Watch it?” Internet Research, 27 (2), 211–32.
38.
HartM. (2017), “Being Naked on the Internet: Young People’s Selfies as Intimate Edgework,” Journal of Youth Studies, 20 (3), 301–15.
39.
HayesA.F. (2018), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis Methodology in the Social Sciences. Guilford Press.
40.
HongH.J. (2022), “eSports: The Need for a Structured Support System for Players,” European Sport Management Quarterly (published online January 28), https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2028876.
41.
HongJ.C.JuanH.C.HungW.C. (2022), “The Role of Family Intimacy in Playing Collaborative e-Sports with a Switch Device to Predict the Experience of Flow and Anxiety During COVID-19 Lockdown,” Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107244.
42.
JangW.W.ByonK.K. (2020), “Antecedents of Esports Gameplay Intention: Genre as a Moderator,” Computers in Human Behavior, 109, 106336.
43.
JanszJ.TanisM. (2007), “Appeal of Playing Online First Person Shooter Games,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10 (1), 133–36.
44.
JennyS.E.ManningR.D.KeiperM.C.OlrichT.W. (2017), “Virtual(ly) Athletes: Where eSports Fit Within the Definition of ‘Sport,’” Quest, 69 (1), 1–18.
KätsyriJ.HariR.RavajaN.NummenmaaL. (2013), “Just Watching the Game Ain’t Enough: Striatal fMRI Reward Responses to Successes and Failures in a Video Game During Active and Vicarious Playing,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 278.
47.
KellerL.BielekeM.WolffW. (2021), “Bursting Balloons—Comparison of Risk Taking Between Extreme Sports, Esports, and the General Public,” Current Psychology (published online December 14), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02616-4.
48.
KellyS.J.DerringtonS.StarS. (2022), “Governance Challenges in Esports: A Best Practice Framework for Addressing Integrity and Well-Being Issues,” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 14 (1), 151–68.
49.
KiferY.HellerD.PerunovicW.Q.E.GalinskyA.D. (2013), “The Good Life of the Powerful,” Psychological Science, 24 (3), 280–88.
50.
KlimmtC.HartmannT. (2006), “Effectance, Self-Efficacy, and the Motivation to Play Video Games,” in Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences, P. Vorderer and J. Bryant, eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 153–68.
51.
KlimmtC.HartmannT.FreyA. (2007), “Effectance and Control as Determinants of Video Game Enjoyment,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10 (6), 845–48.
52.
LopezC.PizzoA.D.GuptaK.KennedyH.FunkD.C. (2021), “Corporate Growth Strategies in an Era of Digitalization: A Network Analysis of the National Basketball Association’s 2K League Sponsors,” Journal of Business Research, 133, 208–17.
53.
LyngS. (1990), “A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking,” American Journal of Sociology, 95 (4), 851–86.
54.
LyngS. (2014), “Action and Edgework,” European Journal of Social Theory, 17 (4), 443–60.
55.
LyngS.MatthewsR. (2007), “Risk, Edgework, and Masculinities,” in Gendered Risks, Hannah-MoffatK.O’MalleyP., eds. Routledge, 75–97.
56.
LyonsE.J.TateD.F.WardD.S.RibislK.M.BowlingJ.M.KalyanaramanS. (2014), “Engagement, Enjoyment, and Energy Expenditure During Active Video Game Play,” Health Psychology, 33 (2), 174–81.
57.
MaH.WuY.WuX. (2013), “Research on Essential Difference of E-Sport and Online Game,” in Informatics and Management Science V: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 208, DuW., ed. London: Springer, 615–21.
58.
MaceyJ.HamariJ. (2018), “Investigating Relationships Between Video Gaming, Spectating Esports, and Gambling,” Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 344–53.
59.
MaceyJ.TyrväinenV.PirkkalainenH.HamariJ. (2022), “Does Esports Spectating Influence Game Consumption?” Behaviour & Information Technology, 41 (1), 181–97.
60.
MarikyanD.PapagiannidisS.AlamanosE. (2020), “Cognitive Dissonance in Technology Adoption: A Study of Smart Home Users,” Information Systems Frontiers (published online July 25), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10042-3.
61.
MarikyanD.PapagiannidisS.RanaO.F.RanjanR. (2022), “Blockchain Adoption: A Study of Cognitive Factors Underpinning Decision Making,” Computers in Human Behavior, 131, 107207.
62.
MarshallM.A.BrownJ.D. (2008), “On the Psychological Benefits of Self-Enhancement,” in Self-Criticism and Self-Enhancement: Theory, Research, and Clinical Implications, ChangE.C., ed. American Psychological Association, 19–35.
63.
MaseehH.I.JebarajakirthyC.PentecostR.ArliD.WeavenS.AshaduzzamanM. (2021), “Privacy Concerns in e-Commerce: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis,” Psychology & Marketing, 38 (10), 1779–98.
64.
McGregorI.LittleB.R. (1998), “Personal Projects, Happiness, and Meaning: On Doing Well and Being Yourself,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (2), 494.
Microsoft (2022), “Not ‘Just a Game’—How Esports Is Training the Workforce of Tomorrow,” (May 17), https://news.microsoft.com/en-nz/2022/05/17/not-just-a-game-how-esports-is-training-the-workforce-of-tomorrow/.
67.
Ortiz de GortariA.B.GriffithsM.D. (2017), “Beyond the Boundaries of the Game: The Interplay Between In-Game Phenomena, Structural Characteristics of Video Games, and Game Transfer Phenomena,” in Boundaries of Self and Reality Online: Implications of Digitally Constructed Realities, J. Gackenbach, J. Bown, and S. Hakopdjanian, eds. Elsevier, 97–121.
68.
PapagiannidisS.MarikyanD. (2020), “Smart Offices: A Productivity and Well-Being Perspective,” International Journal of Information Management, 51, 102027.
69.
ParkE.BaekS.OhmJ.ChangH.J. (2014), “Determinants of Player Acceptance of Mobile Social Network Games: An Application of Extended Technology Acceptance Model,” Telematics and Informatics, 31 (1), 3–15.
70.
PizziG.ScarpiD. (2020), “Privacy Threats with Retail Technologies: A Consumer Perspective,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56, 102160.
71.
PizziG.ScarpiD.PichierriM.VannucciV. (2019), “Virtual Reality, Real Reactions? Comparing Consumers’ Perceptions and Shopping Orientation Across Physical and Virtual-Reality Retail Stores,” Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 1–12.
72.
PizzoA.D.BakerB.J.NaS.LeeM.A.KimD.FunkD.C. (2018), “eSport vs. Sport: A Comparison of Spectator Motives,” Sport Marketing Quarterly, 27 (2), 45–60.
73.
PizzoA.D.KunkelT.JonesG.J.BakerB.J.FunkD.C. (2022), “The Strategic Advantage of Mature-Stage Firms: Digitalization and the Diversification of Professional Sport into Esports,” Journal of Business Research, 139, 257–66.
74.
QianT.Y.MatzR.LuoL.XuC. (2022), “Gamification for Value Creation and Viewer Engagement in Gamified Livestreaming Services: The Moderating Role of Gender in Esports,” Journal of Business Research, 145, 482–94.
75.
RaggiottoF.ScarpiD. (2020), “Living on the Edge: Psychological Drivers of Athletes’ Intention to Re-Patronage Extreme Sporting Events,” Sport Management Review, 23 (2), 229–41.
76.
RaggiottoF.ScarpiD. (2021), “This Must Be the Place: A Destination-Loyalty Model for Extreme Sporting Events,” Tourism Management, 83, 104254.
77.
RaggiottoF.ScarpiD.MasonM.C. (2019), “Faster! More! Better! Drivers of Upgrading Among Participants in Extreme Sports Events,” Journal of Business Research, 102, 1–11.
78.
ReaS.C. (2019), “Chronotopes and Social Types in South Korean Digital Gaming,” Signs and Society, 7 (1), 115–36.
79.
ReitmanJ.G.Anderson-CotoM.J.WuM.LeeJ.S.SteinkuehlerC. (2020), “Esports Research: A Literature Review,” Games and Culture, 15 (1), 32–50.
80.
Rodríguez-PriegoN.PorcuL.KitchenP.J. (2022), “Sharing but Caring: Location Based Mobile Applications (LBMA) and Privacy Protection Motivation,” Journal of Business Research, 140, 546–55.
81.
RyffC.D. (1989), “Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (6), 1069–81.
82.
ScarpiD. (2021), “A Construal-Level Approach to Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Orientation,” Marketing Letters, 32 (2), 261–71.
83.
ScarpiD.PizziG.MattaS. (2022), “Digital Technologies and Privacy: State of the Art and Research Directions,” Psychology & Marketing, 39 (9), 1687–97.
84.
SchwartzS.H. (1992), “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, M.P. Zanna, ed. Academic Press, 1–65.
85.
SedikidesC.GreggA.P. (2008), “Self-Enhancement: Food for Thought,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (2), 102–16.
86.
SeoY. (2013), “Electronic Sports: A New Marketing Landscape of the Experience Economy,” Journal of Marketing Management, 29 (13/14), 1542–60.
87.
SeoY. (2016), “Professionalized Consumption and Identity Transformations in the Field of ESports,” Journal of Business Research, 69 (1), 264–72.
88.
SepehrS.HeadM. (2018), “Understanding the Role of Competition in Video Gameplay Satisfaction,” Information & Management, 55 (4), 407–21.
89.
ShayH. (2017), “Virtual Edgework: Negotiating Risk in Role-Playing Gaming,” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 46 (2), 203–29.
90.
ShohamA.RoseG.M.KahleL.R. (2000), “Practitioners of Risky Sports: A Quantitative Examination,” Journal of Business Research, 47 (3), 237–51.
91.
SjöblomM.MaceyJ.HamariJ. (2020), “Digital Athletics in Analogue Stadiums: Comparing Gratifications for Engagement Between Live Attendance and Online Esports Spectating,” Internet Research, 30 (3), 713–35.
92.
SjöblomM.TörhönenM.HamariJ.MaceyJ. (2017), “Content Structure Is King: An Empirical Study on Gratifications, Game Genres and Content Type on Twitch,” Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 161–71.
StröbelT.GermelmannC.C. (2020), “Exploring New Routes Within Brand Research in Sport Management: Directions and Methodological Approaches,” European Sport Management Quarterly, 20 (1), 1–9.
97.
TaylorS.E.BrownJ.D. (1988), “Illusion and Well-Being: A Social Psychological Perspective on Mental Health,” Psychological Bulletin, 103 (2), 193–210.
WitkowskiE. (2012), “On the Digital Playing Field,” Games and Culture, 7 (5), 349–74.
102.
YanO.H.BonannoG.A. (2015), “How Self-Enhancers Adapt Well to Loss: The Mediational Role of Loneliness and Social Functioning,” Journal of Positive Psychology, 10 (4), 370–82.
103.
YasinM.PorcuL.AbusharbehM.T.Liébana-CabanillasF. (2020), “The Impact of Customer Personality and Online Brand Community Engagement on Intention to Forward Company and Users Generated Content: Palestinian Banking Industry a Case,” Economic Research–Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33 (1), 1985–2006.
104.
YuB.BrisonN.T.BennettG. (2022), “Why Do Women Watch Esports? A Social Role Perspective on Spectating Motives and Points of Attachment,” Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107055.
105.
ZhaiZ.W.HoffR.A.HowellJ.C.WamplerJ.Krishnan-SarinS.PotenzaM.N. (2020), “Differences in Associations Between Problematic Video-Gaming, Video-Gaming Duration, and Weapon-Related and Physically Violent Behaviors in Adolescents,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, 121, 47–55.
