Bridging Who They Are with Who They Thought They’d Be: The Effects of Gen Zers’ Subjective Well-Being on Their Boycott Responses to Online and Offline Unethical Situations
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2023
Bridging Who They Are with Who They Thought They’d Be: The Effects of Gen Zers’ Subjective Well-Being on Their Boycott Responses to Online and Offline Unethical Situations
This research investigates the role of subjective well-being in Gen Zers’ response to unethical situations that are encountered online versus offline. It empirically supports a model that incorporates moral reasoning effects and the aftermath of learning about the situation in either a first-person or third-person perspective. The findings suggest that Gen Zers are eager to show their values and participate in boycotts when facing an unethical situation. Subjective well-being plays an important role in activating versus inhibiting boycott behaviors as a response to unethical situations encountered both online and offline. Counterintuitively, Gen Zers are less likely to show support for a boycott when scoring high on well-being, since they are not willing to signal their commitment to gain social legitimacy. In fact, when coping with unethical situations, they are eager to display their true values and to enact the boycott rather than merely show support for it.
AjzenI. (1991), “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179–211.
2.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1977), “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research,” Psychological Bulletin, 84 (5), 888–918.
3.
AkyurekG.KarsS.BuminG. (2018), “The Determinants of Occupational Therapy Students’ Attitudes: Mindfulness and Well-Being,” Journal of Education and Learning, 7 (3), 242–50.
4.
AshworthL.DarkeP.SchallerM. (2005), “No One Wants to Look Cheap: Trade-Offs Between Social Disincentives and the Economic and Psychological Incentives to Redeem Coupons,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (4), 295–306.
5.
AtanasovaA.EckhardtG.M. (2021), “The Broadening Boundaries of Materialism,” Marketing Theory, 21 (4), 481–500.
6.
AzimiS.AndonovaY.ScheweC. (2021), “Closer Together or Further Apart? Values of Hero Generations Y and Z During Crisis,” Young Consumers, 23 (2), 179–96.
7.
BalderjahnI.LeeM.S.SeegebarthB.PeyerM. (2020), “A Sustainable Pathway to Consumer Well-Being. The Role of Anticonsumption and Consumer Empowerment,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 54 (2), 456–88.
8.
BarbarossaC.De PelsmackerP. (2016), “Positive and Negative Antecedents of Purchasing Eco-Friendly Products: A Comparison Between Green and Non-Green Consumers,” Journal of Business Ethics, 134 (2), 229–47.
9.
BelkR.W. (1988), “Possessions and the Extended Self,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 139–168.
10.
BennettW.L. (2007), “Civic Learning in Changing Democracies: Challenges for Citizenship and Civic Education,” in Young Citizens and New Media, P. Dahlgren, ed. Routledge, 59–77.
11.
BenvenutiM.MazzoniE. (2018), “Surfing the Web: The Role of Social-Support in the Adolescents’ Internet Use,” Progress in Human Computer Interaction, 1 (3), 1–14.
12.
BhattacharyaC.B.SenS. (2003), “Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (2), 76–88.
13.
BoltonL.E.ReedA. (2004), “Sticky Priors: The Perseverance of Identity Effects on Judgment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 41 (4), 397–410.
14.
Bowes-SperryL.PowellG.N. (1999), “Observers’ Reactions to Social-Sexual Behavior at Work: An Ethical Decision Making Perspective,” Journal of Management, 25 (6), 779–802.
15.
BradyW.J.CrockettM.J. (2019), “How Effective Is Online Outrage?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23 (2), 79–80.
16.
BraunsbergerK.BucklerB. (2011), “What Motivates Consumers to Participate in Boycotts: Lessons from the Ongoing Canadian Seafood Boycott,” Journal of Business Research, 64 (1), 96–102.
17.
BrownS.KozinetsR.V.SherryJ.F.Jr. (2003), “Teaching Old Brands New Tricks: Retro Branding and the Revival of Brand Meaning,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (3), 19–33.
18.
BurroughsJ.E.RindfleischA. (2002), “Materialism and Well-Being: A Conflicting Values Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (3), 348–70.
19.
ChandyR.K.JoharG.V.MoormanC.RobertsJ.H. (2021), “Better Marketing for a Better World,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (3), 1–9.
20.
ChayinskaM.MirandaD.GonzálezR. (2021), “A Longitudinal Study of the Bidirectional Causal Relationships Between Online Political Participation and Offline Collective Action,” Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106810.
21.
ConfenteI.ScarpiD.RussoI. (2020), “Marketing a New Generation of Bio-Plastics Products for a Circular Economy: The Role of Green Self-Identity, Self-Congruity, and Perceived Value,” Journal of Business Research, 112, 431–39.
22.
CrockettM.J. (2017), “Moral Outrage in the Digital Age,” Nature Human Behaviour, 1 (11), 769–71.
23.
DabijaD.C.BejanB.M. (2017, May), “A Cross-Generational Perspective on Green Loyalty in Romanian Retail,” Griffiths School of Management and IT Annual Conference on Business, Entrepreneurship and Ethics. Springer, 1–23.
24.
DelistavrouA.KrystallisA.TilikidouI. (2020), “Consumers’ Decision to Boycott ‘Unethical’ Products: The Role of Materialism/Post Materialism,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 48 (10), 1121–38.
25.
De RuyterK.KeelingD.I.PlanggerK.MontecchiM.ScottM.L.DahlD.W. (2021), “Reimagining Marketing Strategy: Driving the Debate on Grand Challenges,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50, 13–21.
26.
DienerE.LucasR.E.OishiS. (2018), “Advances and Open Questions in the Science of Subjective Well-Being,” Collabra: Psychology, 4 (1), 1–49.
DienerE.WirtzD.Biswas-DienerR.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.W.OishiS. (2009), “New Measures of Well-Being,” in Assessing Well-Being: The Collective Works of Ed Diener, DienerE., ed. Springer, 247–66.
29.
DittmarH.BondR.HurstM.KasserT. (2014), “The Relationship Between Materialism and Personal Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107 (5), 879–924.
30.
DjafarovaE.BowesT. (2021), “‘Instagram Made Me Buy It’: Generation Z Impulse Purchases in Fashion Industry,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 59, 102345.
31.
DjafarovaE.FootsS. (2022), “Exploring Ethical Consumption of Generation Z: Theory of Planned Behaviour,” Young Consumers, 23 (3), 413–43.
32.
DovidioJ.F.PiliavinJ.A.GaertnerS.L.SchroederD.A.ClarkR.D.III (1991), “The Arousal: Cost-Reward Model and the Process of Intervention: A Review of the Evidence,” in Prosocial Behavior, ClarkM. S., ed. SAGE Publications, 86–118.
33.
EdwardsM.R. (2005), “Organizational Identification: A Conceptual and Operational Review,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 7 (4), 207–30.
34.
EyalT.LibermanN.TropeY. (2008), “Judging Near and Distant Virtue and Vice,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44 (4), 1204–09.
35.
FernandesD. (2020), “Politics at the Mall: The Moral Foundations of Boycotts,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 39 (4), 494–513.
36.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1977), “Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research,” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10 (2), 130–32.
37.
ForsythD. R. (1980), “A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39 (1), 175–84.
38.
FrancisT.HoefelF. (2018), “‘True Gen’: Generation Z and Its Implications for Companies,” McKinsey & Company (November 12), https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies.
39.
FredricksonB.L. (2013), “Positive Emotions Broaden and Build,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 47. Academic Press, 1–53.
40.
FurchheimP.MartinC.MorhartF. (2020), “Being Green in a Materialistic World: Consequences for Subjective Well–Being,” Psychology & Marketing, 37 (1), 114–30.
41.
GabrielovaK.BuchkoA.A. (2021), “Here Comes Generation Z: Millennials as Managers,” Business Horizons, 64 (4), 489–99.
42.
GarlandE.L.FredricksonB.L. (2019), “Positive Psychological States in the Arc from Mindfulness to Self-Transcendence: Extensions of the Mindfulness-to-Meaning Theory and Applications to Addiction and Chronic Pain Treatment,” Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 184–91.
43.
GoodV.HughesD.E.WangH. (2022), “More Than Money: Establishing the Importance of a Sense of Purpose for Salespeople,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50 (2), 272–95.
44.
GrajI. (2020), “Gen Z Perspectives on Climate Change and the Future: Having the Courage to Imagine and Fight for a Better World,” Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/3283/.
45.
GutfreundJ. (2016), “Move Over, Millennials: Generation Z Is Changing the Consumer Landscape,” Journal of Brand Strategy, 5 (3), 245–49.
46.
HaaseK.R.CoscoT.KervinL.RiadiI.O’ConnellM.E. (2021), “Older Adults’ Experiences with Using Technology for Socialization During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Survey Study,” JMIR Aging, 4 (2), e28010.
47.
HaidtJ. (2001), “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment,” Psychological Review, 108 (4), 814–34.
48.
HarrisA.WynJ.YounesS. (2010), “Beyond Apathetic or Activist Youth: ‘Ordinary’ Young People and Contemporary Forms of Participation,” Young, 18 (1), 9–32.
49.
HeckhausenJ.WroschC.SchulzR. (2019), “Agency and Motivation in Adulthood and old age,” Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 191–217.
50.
Hennig-ThurauT.GwinnerK.P.WalshG.GremlerD.D. (2004), “Electronic Word-of-Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet?” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18 (1), 38–52.
51.
HenselerJ.RingleC.M.SarstedtM. (2015), “A new Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 115–35.
52.
HerbigP.KoehlerW.DayK. (1993), “Marketing to the Baby Bust Generation,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10 (1), 1–9.
53.
HoffmannC.P.LutzC. (2021), “Digital Divides in Political Participation: The Mediating Role of Social Media Self-Efficacy and Privacy Concerns,” Policy & Internet, 13 (1), 6–29.
54.
HofstedeG. (2011), “Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context,” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2 (1), https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014.
55.
HofstedeG.BondM.H. (1984), “Hofstede’s Culture Dimensions: An Independent Validation Using Rokeach’s Value Survey,” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15 (4), 417–33.
56.
HoggM.K.BanisterE.N.StephensonC.A. (2009), “Mapping Symbolic (Anti-) Consumption,” Journal of Business Research, 62 (2), 148–59.
57.
InglehartR.F. (2008), “Changing Values Among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006,” West European Politics, 31 (1–2), 130–46.
58.
IslamT.SheikhZ.HameedZ.KhanI.U.AzamR.I. (2018), “Social Comparison, Materialism, and Compulsive Buying Based on Stimulus-Response-Model: A Comparative Study Among Adolescents and Young Adults,” Young Consumers, 19 (1), 19–37.
59.
JacobsonJ. (2020), “You Are a Brand: Social Media Managers’ Personal Branding and ‘the Future Audience’,” Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29 (6), 715–27.
60.
JöreskogKarl G.SörbromDag (2003), LISREL 8.7 for MAC OS 9 and X 2003. Scientific Software International.
61.
KanskyJ.AllenJ.P.DienerE. (2019), “The Young Adult Love Lives of Happy Teenagers: The Role of Adolescent Affect in Adult Romantic Relationship Functioning,” Journal of Research in Personality, 80, 1–9.
62.
KasserT.RyanR.M.CouchmanC.E.SheldonK.M. (2004), “Materialistic Values: Their Causes and Consequences,” in Psychology and Consumer Culture: The Struggle for a Good Life in a Materialistic World, KasserT.KannerA.D., eds. American Psychological Association, 11–28.
63.
KazdinA.E.Esveldt-DawsonK.MatsonJ.L. (1982), “Changes in Children’s Social Skills Performance as a Function of Preassessment Experiences,” Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 11 (3), 243–48.
64.
KleinJ.G.SmithN.C.JohnA. (2004), “Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (3), 92–109.
65.
KleineS.S.KleineR.E.IIIAllenC.T. (1995), “How Is a Possession ‘Me’ or ‘Not Me’? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment,” Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (3), 327–43.
66.
KozinetsR.V.HandelmanJ.M. (2004), “Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (3), 691–704.
67.
KozinetsR.V.HandelmanJ.M.LeeM.S. (2010), “Don’t Read This; or, Who Cares What the Hell Anti-Consumption Is, Anyways?” Consumption, Markets and Culture, 13 (3), 225–33.
68.
KristoffersonK.WhiteK.PelozaJ. (2014), “The Nature of Slacktivism: How the Social Observability of an Initial Act of Token Support Affects Subsequent Prosocial Action,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (6), 1149–66.
69.
KuanrA.PradhanD.LyngdohT.LeeM.S. (2021), “Why Do Consumers Subvert Brands? Investigating the Influence of Subjective Well-Being on Brand Avoidance,” Psychology & Marketing, 39 (3), 612–33.
70.
KunzmannU.KappesC.WroschC. (2014), “Emotional Aging: A Discrete Emotions Perspective,” Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 380.
71.
LeeM.S.AhnC.S.Y. (2016), “Anti-Consumption, Materialism, and Consumer Well-Being,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 50 (1), 18–47.
72.
LeeM.S.FernandezK.V.HymanM.R. (2009), “Anti-Consumption: An Overview and Research Agenda,” Journal of Business Research, 62 (2), 145–47.
73.
LeeM.S.MotionJ.ConroyD. (2009), “Anti-Consumption and Brand Avoidance,” Journal of Business Research, 62 (2), 169–80.
74.
LeFebvreR.K.ArmstrongC. (2018), “Grievance-Based Social Movement Mobilization in the #Ferguson Twitter Storm,” New Media & Society, 20 (1), 8–28.
75.
LibermanN.TropeY. (1998), “The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (1), 5–18.
LiebermanA.SchroederJ. (2020), “Two Social Lives: How Differences Between Online and Offline Interaction Influence Social Outcomes,” Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 16–21.
78.
LoC.J.TsarenkoY.TojibD. (2019), “To Tell or Not to Tell? The Roles of Perceived Norms and Self-Consciousness in Understanding Consumers’ Willingness to Recommend Online Secondhand Apparel Shopping,” Psychology & Marketing, 36 (4), 287–304.
79.
LongmireS.J.ChanE.Y.LawryC.A. (2021), “Find Me Strength in Things: Fear Can Explain Materialism,” Psychology & Marketing, 38 (12), 2247–58.
80.
LuJ.XieX.XuJ. (2013), “Desirability or Feasibility: Self–Other Decision-Making Differences,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39 (2), 144–55.
81.
LucasR.E.DienerE.GrobA.SuhE.M.ShaoL. (2000), “Cross-Cultural Evidence for the Fundamental Features of Extraversion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (3), 452–68.
82.
Luna-ArocasR.Danvila-del-ValleI. (2021), “Does Positive Well-Being Predict job Performance Three Months Later?” Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16 (4), 1555–69.
83.
LuttrellR.McGrathK. (2021), Gen Z: The Superhero Generation. Rowand & Littlefield Publishing Group.
84.
MacKenzieS.B.PodsakoffP.M. (2012), “Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies,” Journal of Retailing, 88 (4), 542–55.
85.
MakriK.SchlegelmilchB.B.MaiR.DinhofK. (2020), “What We Know About Anticonsumption: An Attempt to Nail Jelly to the Wall,” Psychology & Marketing, 37 (2), 177–215.
86.
MannettiL.PierroA.LiviS. (2004), “Recycling: Planned and Self-Expressive Behaviour,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24 (2), 227–36.
87.
MartinJ.GentryW.A. (2011), “Derailment Signs Across Generations: More in Common Than Expected,” Psychologist-Manager Journal, 14 (3), 177–95.
88.
MartinK.HuebnerE.S.ValoisR.F. (2008), “Does Life Satisfaction Predict Victimization Experiences in Adolescence?” Psychology in the Schools, 45 (8), 705–14.
89.
MazzoniE.BaioccoL.CannataD.Dimas (2016), “Is Internet the Cherry on Top or a Crutch? Offline Social-Support as Moderator of the Outcomes of Online Social-Support on Problematic Internet Use,” Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 369–74.
90.
McGouranC.ProtheroA. (2016), “Enacted Voluntary Simplicity–Exploring the Consequences of Requesting Consumers to Intentionally Consume Less,” European Journal of Marketing, 50 (1/2), 189–212.
91.
MukherjeeS.AlthuizenN. (2020), “Brand Activism: Does Courting Controversy Help or Hurt a Brand?” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37 (4), 772–88.
92.
NunesJ.C.OrdaniniA.GiambastianiG. (2021), “The Concept of Authenticity: What It Means to Consumers,” Journal of Marketing, 85 (4), 1–20.
93.
OishiS.DienerE.ChoiD.W.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiI. (2007), “The Dynamics of Daily Events and Well-Being Across Cultures: When Less Is More,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93 (4), 685–98.
94.
OuweneelP.VeenhovenR. (2016), “Happy Protest Voters: The Case of Rotterdam 1997–2009,” Social Indicators Research, 126 (2), 739–56.
95.
OysermanD. (2009), “Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Action-Readiness, Procedural-Readiness, and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19 (3), 250–60.
96.
OzkanM.SolmazB. (2015), “Mobile Addiction of Generation Z and Its Effects on Their Social Lifes: (An Application Among University Students in the 18–23 Age Group),” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 92–98.
97.
PajunenT. (2021), “Generating Aesthetic Capital: Prospects from Autobiographical Narratives,” in Appearance as Capital: The Normative Regulation of Aesthetic Capital Accumulation and Conversion, Outi Sarpila, Iida Kukkonen, Tero Pajunen, and Erica Åberg, eds. Emerald Publishing Limited, 103–15.
98.
Palacios-FlorencioB.Revilla–CamachoM.Á.GarzónD.Prado–RománC. (2021), “Explaining the Boycott Behavior: A Conceptual Model Proposal and Validation,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20 (5), 1313–25.
99.
PalanK.M.GentinaE.MuratoreI. (2010), “Adolescent Consumption Autonomy: A Cross-Cultural Examination,” Journal of Business Research, 63 (12), 1342–48.
100.
PalleyW. (2012), Gen Z: Digital in Their DNA. Thompson.
101.
PecotF.VasilopoulouS.CavallaroM. (2021), “How Political Ideology Drives Anti-Consumption Manifestations,” Journal of Business Research, 128, 61–69.
102.
PelozaJ.WhiteK.ShangJ. (2013), “Good and Guilt-Free: The Role of Self-Accountability in Influencing Preferences for Products with Ethical Attributes,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 104–19.
103.
PinnaM. (2020), “Do Gender Identities of Femininity and Masculinity Affect the Intention to Buy Ethical Products?” Psychology & Marketing, 37 (3), 384–97.
104.
PintoO.BrandãoA. (2020), “Antecedents and Consequences of Brand Hate: Empirical Evidence from the Telecommunication Industry,” European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 30 (1), 18–35.
105.
PodsakoffP.M.MacKenzieS.B.PodsakoffN.P. (2012), “Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control it,” Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–69.
106.
PrenskyM. (2001), “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants,” On the Horizon, 9 (5), 1–6.
107.
RaggiottoF.ScarpiD. (2021), “Generation Z Active Sports Tourism: A Conceptual Framework and Analysis of Intention to Revisit,” in Generation Z Marketing and Management in Tourism and Hospitality, Nikolaos Stylos, Roya Rahimi, Bendegul Okumus, and Sarah Williams, eds. Palgrave Macmillan, 281–302.
108.
RichardsonH.A.SimmeringM.J.SturmanM.C. (2009), “A Tale of Three Perspectives: Examining Post Hoc Statistical Techniques for Detection and Correction of Common Method Variance,” Organizational Research Methods, 12 (4), 762–800.
109.
RobertsonT.S.GatignonH. (1986), “Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion,” Journal of Marketing, 50 (3), 1–12.
110.
SaengerC.ThomasV.L.JohnsonJ.W. (2013), “Consumption-Focused Self-Expression Word of Mouth: A New Scale and Its Role in Consumer Research,” Psychology & Marketing, 30 (11), 959–70.
111.
SakdiyakornM.GolubovskayaM.SolnetD. (2021), “Understanding Generation Z Through Collective Consciousness: Impacts for Hospitality Work and Employment,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102822.
112.
SchoenebornD.MorsingM.CraneA. (2020), “Formative Perspectives on the Relation Between CSR Communication and CSR Practices: Pathways for Walking, Talking, and T(w)alking,” Business & Society, 59 (1), 5–33.
113.
SchwartzS.H. (2012), “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values,” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2 (1), https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
114.
SenS.Gürhan-CanliZ.MorwitzV. (2001), “Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (3), 399–417.
115.
ShawD.NewholmT. (2002), “Voluntary Simplicity and the Ethics of Consumption,” Psychology & Marketing, 19 (2), 167–85.
116.
ShimK.ChoH.KimS.YeoS.L. (2021), “Impact of Moral Ethics on Consumers’ Boycott Intentions: A Cross-Cultural Study of Crisis Perceptions and Responses in the United States, South Korea, and Singapore,” Communication Research, 48 (3), 401–25.
117.
SirgyM.J. (1982), “Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (3), 287–300.
118.
SparksP.ShepherdR. (1992), “Self-Identity and the Theory of Planned Behavior: Assessing the Role of Identification with ‘Green Consumerism’,” Social Psychology Quarterly, 55 (4), 388–99.
119.
StrenzeT. (2021), “Value Change in the Western World: The Rise of Materialism, Post-Materialism or Both?” International Review of Sociology, 1–18.
120.
TajfelH. (1982), “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations,” Annual Review of Psychology, 31 (3), 536–53.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010), “Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance,” Psychological Review, 117 (2), 440–63.
126.
TwengeJ.M.JoinerT.E.RogersM.L.MartinG.N. (2018), “Increases in Depressive Symptoms, Suicide-Related Outcomes, and Suicide Rates among US Adolescents After 2010 and Links to Increased New Media Screen Time,” Clinical Psychological Science, 6 (1), 3–17.
127.
UnderwoodM.K.EhrenreichS.E. (2017), “The Power and the Pain of Adolescents’ Digital Communication: Cyber Victimization and the Perils of Lurking,” American Psychologist, 72 (2), 144–58.
128.
ValkenburgP.M.PeterJ. (2011), “Online Communication Among Adolescents: An Integrated Model of Its Attraction, Opportunities, and Risks,” Journal of Adolescent Health, 48 (2), 121–27.
129.
VassalloF. (2020), “After the Crisis: Political Protest in the Aftermath of the Economic Recession,” Comparative European Politics, 18 (1), 45–72.
130.
VissersS.StolleD. (2014), “The Internet and New Modes of Political Participation: Online Versus Offline Participation,” Information, Communication & Society, 17 (8), 937–55.
131.
WangW.MoT.WangY. (2022), “Better Self and Better Us: Exploring the Individual and Collective Motivations for China’s Generation Z Consumers to Reduce Plastic Pollution,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 179, 106111.
132.
WardJ.de VreeseC. (2011), “Political Consumerism, Young Citizens and the Internet,” Media, Culture & Society, 33 (3), 399–413.
133.
WatsonD.C. (2021), “Neuroticism Versus Emotionality as Mediators of the Negative Relationship Between Materialism and Well-Being,” Heliyon, 7 (4), e06783.
134.
WilsonA.E.DarkeP.R.SenguptaJ. (2022), “Winning the Battle but Losing the War: Ironic Effects of Training Consumers to Detect Deceptive Advertising Tactics,” Journal of Business Ethics, 181, 997–1013.
135.
WoodS. (2013), “Generation Z as Consumers: Trends and Innovation,” Institute for Emerging Issues: NC State University, 119 (9), 7767–79.
136.
XieC.BagozziR.P. (2019), “Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Irresponsibility: The Role of Moral Emotions, Evaluations, and Social Cognitions,” Psychology & Marketing, 36 (6), 565–86.
137.
XieC.BagozziR.P.MelandK.V. (2015), “The Impact of Reputation and Identity Congruence on Employer Brand Attractiveness,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33 (2), 124–46.
138.
YoungdahlW.E.KelloggD.L.NieW.BowenD.E. (2003), “Revisiting Customer Participation in Service Encounters: Does Culture Matter?” Journal of Operations Management, 21 (1), 109–20.
139.
YukselU. (2013), “Non-Participation in Anti-Consumption: Consumer Reluctance to Boycott,” Journal of Macromarketing, 33 (3), 204–16.
140.
YukselU.ThaiN.T.LeeM.S. (2020), “Boycott Them! No, Boycott This! Do Choice Overload and Small–Agent Rationalization Inhibit the Signing of Anti-Consumption Petitions?” Psychology & Marketing, 37 (2), 340–54.
ZavestoskiS. (2002), “The Social–Psychological Bases of Anticonsumption Attitudes,” Psychology & Marketing, 19 (2), 149–65.
143.
ZeleznyL.C.ChuaP.P.AldrichC. (2000), “Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism,” Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3), 443–58.
144.
ZiesemerF.HüttelA.BalderjahnI. (2021), “Young People as Drivers or Inhibitors of the Sustainability Movement: The Case of Anti-Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Policy, 44 (3), 427–53.
