This study explores how victims of intermittent abusive supervision cope in the context of temporary professional teams where supervisor–subordinate relationships are transient and constantly shifting. Employing critical incident interviews with 23 non-management aircrew and using thematic data analysis, this study revealed that transient leader–member exchanges make supervisory abusive behaviors less enduring and more predictable. This provides opportunities to mitigate/eliminate workplace stressors through prevention strategies, including ingratiation, localization, withdrawing shifts, and seeking instrumental support. The study identifies victim coping tactics with different foci in three phases: pre-occurrence, proceeding, and post-occurrence. Our research extends Lazarus and Folkman’s theory of stress, appraisal, and coping, developing a theoretical framework for victims’ appraisal and coping mechanisms of abusive supervision in temporary working contexts. It offers evidence-based recommendations for HR practitioners to formulate policies addressing the detrimental effects of abusive supervision. This is particularly significant in industries like aviation or other ad-hoc sectors employing flexible membership.
ArainG. A.BukhariS.KhanA. K.HameedI. (2020). The impact of abusive supervision on employees’ feedback avoidance and subsequent help-seeking behaviour: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(5), 850–865. https://doi:10.1017/jmo.2018.44
2.
AtwaterL.KimK.WittA.LatheefZ.CallisonK.ElkinsT.ZhengD. (2016). Reactions to abusive supervision: Examining the roles of emotions and gender in the USA. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(16), 1874–1899. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1088887
3.
BahariS. F. (2010). Qualitative versus quantitative research strategies: Contrasting epistemological and ontological assumptions. Sains Humanika, 52(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v52n1.256
4.
BaumT. (2012). Working the skies: Changing representations of gendered work in the airline industry, 1930-2011. Tourism Management, 33(5), 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.11.012
5.
BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.). (2007). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Sage.
6.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
7.
CoyneI.GopaulA. M.CampbellM.PankászA.GarlandR.CousansF. (2019). Bystander responses to bullying at work: The role of mode, type and relationship to target. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(3), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3692-2
8.
CropanzanoR.DasboroughM. T.WeissH. M. (2017). Affective events and the development of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0384
9.
DedahanovA. T.MiaoS.SemyonovA. A. (2021). When does abusive supervision mitigate work effort? Moderating roles of cognitive reappraisal and rumination. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 42(3), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2020-0312
10.
FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
11.
FischerT.TianA. W.LeeA.HughesD. J. (2021). Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), Article 101540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101540
12.
GoetzN.WaldA.FreisingerE. (2021). A person-environment-fit-model for temporary organizations-antecedents for temporary working settings. International Journal of Project Management, 39(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.08.006
13.
GoldkuhlG. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.54
14.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
15.
HadaricsM.KendeA. (2018). Moral foundations of positive and negative intergroup behavior: Moral exclusion fills the gap. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 64(May), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.03.006
16.
HarveyP.StonerJ.HochwarterW.KacmarC. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.008
HongG.ChoY.FroeseF. J.ShinM. (2016). The effect of leadership styles, rank, and seniority on affective organizational commitment: A comparative study of U.S. and Korean employees. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(2), 340–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2014-0034
19.
JollyP. M.LeeL. (2021). Silence is not golden: Motivating employee voice through inclusive leadership. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 45(6), 1092–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020963699
20.
KaratunaI. (2015). Targets’ coping with workplace bullying: A qualitative study. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 10(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2013-1176
21.
KemperS. (2016). Abusive Supervision in the Workplace: An Examination of Current Research and a Proposal for Preventive Measures. Unpublished thesis of Honors degree at Portland State University, Oregon, the United States. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.248
KiewitzC.RestubogS. L. D.ShossM. K.GarciaP. R. J. M.TangR. L. (2016). Suffering in silence: Investigating the role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000074
24.
KimB. P.GeorgeR. T. (2005). The relationship between Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and psychological empowerment: A quick casual restaurant employee correlation study. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 29(4), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348005276498
25.
KlaussnerS. (2014). Engulfed in the abyss: The emergence of abusive supervision as an escalating process of supervisor-subordinate interaction. Human Relations, 67(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713493027
26.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
27.
LeeJ.OkC. (2015). Examination of factors affecting hotel employees’ service orientation: An emotional labor perspective. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 39(4), 437–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348013491593
28.
LeeS.LeeN.LeeT. J.HyunS. S. (2023). The influence of social support from intermediary organizations on innovativeness and subjective happiness in community-based tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2175836
29.
LiaoZ.LeeH. W.JohnsonR. E.SongZ.LiuY. (2021). Seeing from a short-term perspective: When and why daily abusive supervisor behavior yields functional and dysfunctional consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000508
30.
LimJ.LeeH. C. (2020). Comparisons of service quality perceptions between full service carriers and low cost carriers in airline travel. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(10), 1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1604638
31.
MaE.WangD.WangL.LiuA. (2023). Industry as contexts or theory? A systematic and meta-analysis of status and directions of organizational citizenship behaviors in hospitality. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(5), 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211019104
32.
MeiserE. T.PantumsinchaiP. (2022). The normalization of violence in commercial kitchens through food media. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15–16), 13928–13951. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211005138
33.
MiaoL. (2021). The interplay between context and concept: Theorizing in hospitality and tourism research. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 45(8), 1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211002618
34.
OhJ. K.FarhC. I. (2017). An emotional process theory of how subordinates appraise, experience, and respond to abusive supervision over time. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0347
ParkI.-J.HaiS.KimP. B. (2022). How capricious supervisors affect hospitality employees’ service performance? A diary study from the employees’ emotional perspective. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(8), 1371–1398. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221076782
37.
PraesriS.MeekunK.LeeT. J.HyunS. S. (2022). Marketing mix factors and a business development model for street food tourism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 52(6), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.06.007
38.
QinZ.LeeT. J. (2023). Unraveling abusive supervision climate in aircrew workplaces: The roles of temporary organizational features, trust, and gender dynamics. Behavioral Sciences, 13(8), Article 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080656
RichmanS. L.LearyM. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multi-motive model. Psychological Review, 116(2), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015250
41.
ShaoP.LiA.MawritzM. (2018). Self-protective reactions to peer abusive supervision: The moderating role of prevention focus and the mediating role of performance instrumentality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2206
42.
SrivastavaS.MadanP.PandeyD. N. (2023). Does remaining silent help in coping with workplace incivility among hotel employees?Role of Personality. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 54(March), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.01.007
43.
TaylorP.MooreS. (2015). Cabin crew collectivism: Labour process and the roots of mobilization. Work, Employment and Society, 29(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014538336
44.
TepperB. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
45.
TepperB. J.MossS. E.LockhartD. E.CarrJ. C. (2007). Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159918
TewsM. J.StaffordK. (2020). The impact of abusive supervision and constituent attachment on entry-level employee turnover. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44(8), 1318–1334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020947139
48.
VogelR. M.BolinoM. C. (2020). Recurring nightmares and silver linings: Understanding how past abusive supervision may lead to posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth. Academy of Management Review, 45(3), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0350
49.
VorellM. S.CarmackH. J. (2015). Healing the healer: Stress and coping strategies in the field of temporary medical work. Health Communication, 30(4), 398–408. https://doi/org/10.1080/10410236.2013.865506
50.
YagilD.Ben-ZurH.TamirI. (2011). Do employees cope effectively with abusive supervision at work? An exploratory study. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020548
51.
YangW.XuS. (2023). Should we be more mindful? The joint impact of an abusive work environment and mindfulness on employee well-being and turnover intentions. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480231156832
52.
YuY.XuS.LiG.KongH. (2020). A systematic review of research on abusive supervision in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(7), 2473–2496. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2019-1004.
