The purpose of this article is to describe a new collaborative immersion approach for developing evaluation capacity that was used in kindergarten through Grade 12 (K-12) schools and to place this new approach on a continuum of existing capacity-building methods. The continuum extends from individualistic training-oriented methods to collaborative real-world methods of building evaluation capacity. The strengths and weaknesses of various evaluation capacity building methods are analyzed and critiqued. Included are examples of capacity building focused on technical assistance, workshops, fellowships, and collaborative immersion. The authors make the case for considering a collaborative immersion approach to evaluation capacity building.
Arnold, M. (2006). Developing evaluation capacity in extension 4-H field faculty: A framework for success. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 257-269.
2.
Baizerman, M., Compton, D.W., & Stockdill, S. (2002). New directions for ECB. In D. W. Compton, M. Baizerman, & S. Stockdill (Eds.), The art, craft, and science of evaluation capacity building, Vol. 93: New directions for evaluation (pp. 109-116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Bamberger, M. (2000). The evaluation of international development programs: A view from the front. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(1), 95-102.
4.
Boyle, R., & Lemaire, D. (1999). Building effective evaluation capacity: Lessons from practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
5.
Brown, R.E., & Reed, C.S. (2002). An integral approach to evaluating outcome evaluation training. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(1), 1-17.
6.
Compton, D.W., Glover-Kudon, R., Smith, I.E., & Avery, M.E. (2002). Ongoing capacity building in the American Cancer Society (ACS) 1995-2001. In D. W. Compton , M. Baizerman, & S. Stockdill (Eds.) The art, craft, and science of evaluation capacity building, Vol. 93: New directions for evaluation (pp. 47-61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Douglah, M.A., & Boyd, H.H. (2003, November). Nurturing the development of an evaluation culture in a public educational agency. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Evaluation Association, Reno, NV.
8.
Fetterman, D. & Wandersman, A. (2007). Empowerment evaluation: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. American Journal of Evaluation , 28(2), 179-198.
9.
Horizon Research Incorporated. (1997). Local systemic change core evaluation data collection manual. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research Incorporated.
10.
Huffman, D., & Thomas, K. (in press). Collaborative inquiry and data-based decision making. In T. Kowalski & T. Lasley, (Eds.), Handbook of data-based decision making in education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Huffman, D., Thomas, K., Lawrenz, F., & Clarkson, L. (2006). Collaborative evaluation communities in urban schools. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
12.
King, J.A. (2002). Building the evaluation capacity in a school district . In D. W. Compton, M. Baizerman, & S. Stockdill (Eds.), The art, craft, and science of evaluation capacity building, Vol. 93: New directions for evaluation (pp. 63-80). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
13.
Lawrenz, F., & Huffman, D. (2001). Evaluation fellows program: Final report. Arlington. VA: National Science Foundation.
14.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., Love, N., & Stiles, K.E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15.
Miller, T., Kobayashi, M., & Noble, P. (2006). Insourcing, not capacity building, a better model for sustained program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation , 27(1), 83-94.
16.
National Research Council. (1999). Global perspectives for local action: Using TIMSS to improve U.S. mathematics and science education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
Parsons, B.A. (2002). Evaluative inquiry: Using evaluation to promote student success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
18.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
20.
Stockdill, S.H., Baizerman, M., & Compton, D.W. (2002). Toward a definition of the ECB process: A conversation with the ECB literature. In D. W. Compton , M. Baizerman, & S. Stockdill (Eds.), The art, craft, and science of evaluation capacity building, Vol. 93: New directions for evaluation (pp. 7-25). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Vygotsky, L. (1997). Thought and language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
22.
Weiss, I. (2006, November). The LSC core evaluation: Lessons learned from a multiple site evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Portland, OR.
