Police organizations that implement community policing often seek new ways to measure officer performance. One important way to measure officer and organizational performance is through surveys of citizens. Although many police departments survey citizens, research has generally overlooked the manner in which this information is used and the effects of citizen feedback. This research describes one program that provides citizen feedback to patrol officers in hopes of increasing the quality of service that they provide. Using a randomized design, the authors test the effects of providing citizen feedback to officers on their job performance and attitudes. Results show that citizen feedback does not alter officers’ performance, attitudes toward the communities they serve, and activities that put them in close contact with those communities. The authors discuss potential explanations for finding no effects of the feedback intervention and pose directions for future research.
Argyris, C. (1992). On organizational learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
2.
Bayley, D. H. (1994). Police for the future. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bayley, D. H. (1996). Measuring overall effectiveness. In L. T. Hoover (Ed.), Quantifying quality in policing (pp. 37-54). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
4.
Bitner, M. J., & Hubbert, A. R. (1994). Encounter satisfaction versus overall satisfaction versus quality: The customer’s voice. In R. T. Rust & R. L. Oliver (Eds.), Service quality: New directions in theory and practice (pp. 79-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Bondurant, E. (1991, November). Citizen response questionnaire: A valuable evaluation tool. The Police Chief, pp. 74-76.
6.
Bordua, D. J., & Tifft, L. L. (1971). Citizen interviews, organizational feedback, and police-community relations decisions. Law and Society Review, 6, 155-182.
7.
Brandl, S. G., Frank, J., Worden, R. E., and Bynum, T. S. (1994). Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship. Justice Quarterly, 11, 119-134.
8.
Cadwallader, M. L. (1959). The cybernetic analysis of change in complex social organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 154-157.
9.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10.
Carter, D. L. (1996). Measuring quality: The scope of community policing. In L. T. Hoover (Ed.), Quantifying quality in policing (pp. 73-93). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
11.
Couper, D. C., & Lobitz, S. H. (1991). Quality policing: The Madison experience. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
12.
Dean, D. (1980). Citizen ratings of the police: The difference contact makes. Law and Policy Quarterly, 2, 445-471.
13.
Dechert, C. R. (1969). The development of cybernetics. In A. Etizioni (Ed.), A sociological reader on complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 103-117). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
14.
Duncan, R. B. (1972). Organizational climate and climate for change in three police departments: Some preliminary findings. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 8, 205-245.
15.
Dunham, R. G., & Alpert, G. P. (1988). Neighborhood differences in attitudes toward policing: Evidence for a mixed-strategy model of policing in a multi-ethnic setting. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 79, 504-523.
16.
Eck, J., & Maguire, E. R. (2001). Have changes in policing reduced violent crime? An assessment of the evidence. In J. Wallman & A. Blumstein (Eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 207-265). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Eck, J. E., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (1994). The new police order: Effectiveness, equity, and efficiency in community policing. In D. P. Rosenbaum (Ed.), The challenge of community policing: Testing the promises (pp. 3-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Gallagher, C., Maguire, E. R., Mastrofski, S. D., & Reisig, M. D. (2001). The public perception of the police image. Unpublished manuscript, Administration of Justice Program, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
19.
Gormley, W. T., & Weimer, D. L. (1999). Organizational report cards. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Hammer, M., & Stanton, S. A. (1995). The reengineering revolution. New York: Harper-Collins.
21.
Hickman, M. J., & Reaves, B. A. (2001). Local police departments, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
22.
Hoover, L. T. (Ed.). (1996). Quantifying quality in policing. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
23.
Klockars, C. B. (1999). Some really cheap ways of measuring what really matters. In R. H. Langworthy (Ed.), Measuring what matters: Proceedings from the Police Research Institute meetings (pp. 195-214). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
24.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284
25.
Langan, P. A., Greenfeld, L. A., Smith, S. K., Durose, M. R., and Levin, D. J. (2001). Contacts between police and the public: Findings from the 1999 National Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
26.
Langworthy, R. H. (1999a). What matters routinely? In R. H. Langworthy (Ed.), Measuring what matters: Proceedings from the Police Research Institute meetings (pp. 215-224). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
27.
Langworthy, R. H. (Ed.). (1999b). Measuring what matters: Proceedings from the Policing Research Institute meetings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
28.
Langworthy, R. H., & Morris, A. (1998). Evaluating police performance. Community Policing Exchange, 5, 1-2.
29.
London, M. (1997). Job feedback: Giving, seeking, and using feedback for performance improvement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
London, M., & Smither, J. W. (1995). Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance-related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research. Personnel Psychology, 48, 803-839.
31.
Maguire, K., & Pastore, A. L. (1998). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics. Retrieved from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook.
32.
Mastrofski, S. D. (1981). Surveying clients to assess police performance. Evaluation Review, 5, 397-408.
33.
Mastrofski, S. D. (1996). Measuring police performance in public encounters. In L. T. Hoover (Ed.), Quantifying quality in policing (pp. 207-241). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
34.
Mastrofski, S. D. (1999, March). Policing for people. In Ideas in American Policing (pp 1-11). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Police Foundation.
35.
Meyer, M. (1979). Organizational structure as signaling. Pacific Sociological Review, 22, 481-500.
36.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization (1st ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
Moore, M. H., & Poethig, M. (1999). The police as an agency of municipal government: Implications for measuring police effectiveness. In R. H. Langworthy (Ed.), Measuring what matters: Proceedings from the Police Research Institute Meetings (pp. 151-167). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
39.
Oettmeier, T. N., & Wycoff, M. A. (1998). Personnel performance evaluations in the community policing context. In G. P. Alpert & A. Piquero (Eds.), Community policing: Contemporary readings (pp. 275-305). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
40.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
41.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12-40.
42.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163-204.
43.
Reaves, B. A., & Goldberg, A. L. (2000). Local police departments, 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
44.
Reisig, M. D., & Chandek, M. S. (2001). The effects of expectancy disconfirmation on outcome satisfaction in police-citizen encounters. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 24, 88-99.
45.
Scheingold, S. A. (1999). Constituent expectations of the police and police expectations of constituents. In R. H. Langworthy (Ed.), Measuring what matters: Proceedings from the Police Research Institute meetings (pp. 183-192). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
46.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
47.
Stephens, D. W. (1996). Community problem-oriented policing: Measuring impact. In L. T. Hoover (Ed.), Quantifying quality in policing (pp. 95-129). Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
48.
Travis, L. F., Novak, K. J., Winston, C. N., & Hurley, D. C. (2000). Cops at the door: The impact of citizens surveys by police on public attitudes. Police Quarterly, 3, 85-104.
49.
Trojanowicz, R., & Bucqueroux, B. (1990). Community policing: A contemporary perspective. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
50.
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51.
White, M. F., & Menke, B. A. (1982). On assessing the mood of the public toward the police: Some conceptual issues. Journal of Crime and Justice, 10, 211-230.
52.
Winfree, L. T., Jr., Bartku, G. M., & Seibel, G. (1996). Supporting community policing versus traditional policing among nonmetropolitan police officers: A survey of four New Mexico police departments. American Journal of Police, 15, 23-50.
53.
Worrall, J. L. (1999). Public perceptions of police efficacy and image: The “fuzziness” of support for the police. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 47-66.
54.
Wycoff, M. A., & Oettmeier, T. N. (1994). Evaluating patrol officer performance under community policing. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
