Muscular strength and function after total hip arthroplasty performed with three different surgical approaches: one-year follow-up study

Abstract

Background:

Surgical approach influences short-term muscular strength, and leg-strength asymmetry has been demonstrated after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We evaluated muscular strength, physical function and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) up to 12 months postoperatively, in patients operated on using 3 different surgical approaches.

Methods:

60 patients scheduled for primary THA were allocated to the direct lateral (DLA), posterior (PA) or anterior (AA) approach. The following parameters were evaluated: leg press and abduction strength, pain, 6-minute walking test, Harris Hip Score and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS).

Results:

Abduction strength in the DLA group was significantly more reduced than the PA and AA groups 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). A significant interleg difference in abduction (p < 0.01) and leg press (p < 0.03) persisted in all groups up to 6 months, and up to 12 months in the DLA (p < 0.05). In the AA group, interleg difference in leg press was present up to 12 months (p = 0.01). Pain scores were higher in the DLA than the AA group at 6 months (p = 0.01). Patients in the PA group had better HOOS-PS score than those in the DLA group 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.02). No intergroup differences in pain or PROMs were found 12 months postoperatively.

Conclusion:

Patients operated via the DLA had reduced muscular strength, HOOS-PS scores and higher pain scores than those who underwent PA and AA type surgery. The non-operated leg was significantly stronger than the operated leg in all groups 6 months postoperatively and this persisted up to 12 months postoperatively for the DLA and AA groups.

Clinical Trial Protocol number: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01506024).

Keywords

Fast-track follow-up muscle strength surgical approach total hip arthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Holm

Kristensen

Husted

et al . Thigh and knee circumference, knee-extension strength, and functional performance after fast-track total hip arthroplasty. PM R 2011; 3: 117–124.

Winther

Husby

Foss

et al . Muscular strength after total hip arthroplasty. A prospective comparison of 3 surgical approaches. Acta Orthop 2016; 87: 22–28.

Cheng

Feng

Liu

et al . Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 2009; 33: 1473–1481.

Samuel

Rowe

Hood

et al . The relationships between muscle strength, biomechanical functional moments and health-related quality of life in non-elite older adults. Age Ageing 2012; 41: 224–230.

McCrory

White

Lifeso

RM.

Vertical ground reaction forces: objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 2001; 14: 104–109.

Talis

Grishin

Solopova

et al . Asymmetric leg loading during sit-to-stand, walking and quiet standing in patients after unilateral total hip replacement surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008; 23: 424–433.

Foucher

Wimmer

MA.

Contralateral hip and knee gait biomechanics are unchanged by total hip replacement for unilateral hip osteoarthritis. Gait Posture 2012; 35: 61–65.

Lamontagne

Beaulieu

Beaulé

PE.

Comparison of joint mechanics of both lower limbs of THA patients with healthy participants during stair ascent and descent. J Orthop Res 2011; 29: 305–311.

Andriacchi

Mündermann

The role of ambulatory mechanics in the initiation and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006; 18: 514–518.

10.

Laroche

Cook

Mackala

Strength asymmetry increases gait asymmetry and variability in older women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 2172–2181.

11.

Sicard-Rosenbaum

Light

Behrman

AL.

Gait, lower extremity strength, and self-assessed mobility after hip arthroplasty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57: M47–51.

12.

Rasch

Byström

Dalén

et al . Persisting muscle atrophy two years after replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91: 583–588.

13.

Judd

Dennis

Thomas

et al . Muscle strength and functional recovery during the first year after THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 654–664.

14.

Agten

Sutter

Dora

et al . MR imaging of soft tissue alterations after total hip arthroplasty: comparison of classic surgical approaches. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 1312–1321.

15.

Mjaaland

Kivle

Svenningsen

et al . Comparison of markers for muscle damage, inflammation, and pain using minimally invasive direct anterior versus direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Orthop Res 2015; 33: 1305–1310.

16.

Müller

Tohtz

Springer

et al . Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131: 179–189.

17.

Rasch

Dalén

Berg

HE.

Muscle strength, gait, and balance in 20 patients with hip osteoarthritis followed for 2 years after THA. Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 183–188.

18.

Rosenlund

Broeng

Overgaard

et al . The efficacy of modified direct lateral versus posterior approach on gait function and hip muscle strength after primary total hip arthroplasty at 12 months follow-up. An explorative randomised controlled trial. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2016; 39: 91–99.

19.

Rodriguez

Deshmukh

Rathod

et al . Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 455–463.

20.

Downing

Clark

Hutchinson

et al . Hip abductor strength following total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of the posterior and lateral approach in 100 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 215–220.

21.

Bandholm

Kehlet

Physiotherapy exercise after fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty: time for reconsideration?

Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93: 1292–1294.

22.

Shih

Lin

et al . Muscular recovery around the hip joint after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 302: 115–120.

23.

Jensen

Aagaard

Overgaard

Recovery in mechanical muscle strength following resurfacing vs standard total hip arthroplasty - a randomised clinical trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19: 1108–1116.

24.

Friesenbichler

Casartelli

Wellauer

et al . Explosive and maximal strength before and 6 months after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2018; 36: 425–431.

25.

Edmunds

Boscainos

PJ.

Effect of surgical approach for total hip replacement on hip function using Harris Hip scores and Trendelenburg’s test. A retrospective analysis. Surgeon 2011; 9: 124–129.

26.

Heiberg

Ekeland

Bruun-Olsen

et al . Recovery and prediction of physical functioning outcomes during the first year after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94: 1352–1359.

27.

Amlie

Havelin

Furnes

et al . Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1–3 years after surgery. Acta Orthop 2014; 85: 463–469.