A comparative health care inventory for primary hip arthroplasty between Germany versus the Netherlands. Is there a downside effect to fast-track surgery with regard to patient satisfaction and functional outcome?

Abstract

Background:

Treatment and rehabilitation protocol for hip arthroplasty differs between Germany and the Netherlands. The Dutch system promotes fast-track surgery whereas in Germany conventional care is provided with a longer hospital stay including rehabilitation. Clinical outcome, patient satisfaction and costs in both treatment protocols were compared in a prospective setup.

Material and methods:

This prospective cohort study included patients allocated for primary THA in 3 German and 1 Dutch hospital in the border region. Patient-reported outcome scores (PROMS) were measured pre- and postoperatively at 6 and 12 months including the Oxford Hip Score, SF12 survey, visual analogue scale for satisfaction and pain. Length of hospitalisation and availability of postoperative rehabilitation were recorded. In addition, a total cost estimation was calculated using health insurers data.

Results:

A total of 360 consecutive patients were included; 175 THA in Germany compared to 185 THA in the Netherlands. No cross-border healthcare was encountered in both cohorts. Mean length of hospitalisation was 11.3 (range 6–23) days in Germany, compared to 4.4 (range 3–25) days in the Netherlands. In Germany 92% of the patients was discharged with inpatient (72%) or outpatient (20%) rehabilitation, compared to 21% with only inpatient rehabilitation in the Netherlands. No significant differences were measured regarding the PROMS and patient satisfaction between both countries. Due to profound differences in health care financing only a global cost estimation could be made and no major differences were encountered.

Conclusion:

Germany and the Netherlands both offer highly protocolled care for THA with comparable functional outcome and patient satisfaction with treatment after 12 months. Despite the length of hospitalisation in Germany is significantly longer including a more intensive rehabilitation programme, no significant differences were recorded regarding functional outcome nor patient satisfaction compared to fast-track surgery performed in the Netherlands.

Keywords

Costs fast-track healthcare satisfaction total hip arthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Katz

JN.

Total joint replacement in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006; 20: 145–153.

Garrett

Jr Swiontkowski

Weinstein

, et al. American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Practice of the Orthopaedic Surgeon: part-II, certification examination case mix. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 660–667.

LROI. Orthopedische implantaten in beeld. LROI-Rapportage 2018, http://www.lroi-rapportage.nl/media/pdf/PDF%20Online_LROI_annual_report_2018.pdf

Otten

van Roermund

Picavet

HS.

Trends in the number of knee and hip arthroplasties: considerably more knee and hip prostheses due to osteoarthritis in 2030. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2010; 154: A1534.

Statistisches Bundesamt. Die 20 häufigsten Operationen ingesamt (OPS-Schlüssel 5), https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Gesundheit/Krankenhaeuser/Tabellen/DRGOperationenInsgesamt.html (2017, accessed 26 November 2018).

Kehlet

Fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Lancet 2013; 381: 1600–1602.

Hackenbroch

MH.

Arthrosen Basiswissen zu Klinik, Diagnostik und Therapie. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2002.

Dawson

Fitzpatrick

Murray

, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 63–69.

Dawson

Fitzpatrick

Carr

, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 185–190.

10.

Ware

Jr Kosinski

Bayliss

, et al. Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1995; 33(Suppl. 4): AS264–AS279.

11.

Ware

Jr Kosinski

Keller

SD.

A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220–233.

12.

Jenkinson

Layte

Jenkinson

, et al. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med 1997; 19: 179–186.

13.

Brokelman

Haverkamp

van Loon

, et al. The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. Eur Orthop Traumatol 2012; 3: 101–105.

14.

Nederlandse Zorgautoriteit. DBC ONDERHOUD, RSAD-document: Beschrijving van het RSAD-model, de basis van DOT, de nieuwe DBC-systematiek voor de ziekenhuiszorg, http://docplayer.nl/62981561-Rsad-document-beschrijving-van-het-rsad-model-de-basis-van-dot-de-nieuwe-dbc-systematiek-voor-de-ziekenhuiszorg.html (2013).

15.

Dutch Healthcare Authority. Healthcare products rate application. 2014, https://zorgproducten.nza.nl/ZoekZorgproduct.aspx.

16.

Rijksoverheid. Is fysiotherapie opgenomen in het basispakket? https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/zorgverzekering/vraag-en-antwoord/is-fysiotherapie-opgenomen-in-het-basispakket. (2018, accessed 18 Janaury 2018).

17.

Bundesfinanzrahmengesetz. Law on the regulatory framework of hospital financing from 2009 (Hospital Financing Reform Act - KHRG). BMG, 2018.

18.

Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus Deutsche Kodierrichtlinien. Herzlich willkommen . . ., http://www.g-drg.de (2018, accessed 20 Janaury 2018).

19.

Institut für das Entgeltsystem im Krankenhaus. Fallpauschalen-Katalog 2017, http://www.g-drg.de. (2018, accessed 20 January 2018).

20.

Bandholm

Kehlet

Physiotherapy exercise after fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty: time for reconsideration?

Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 93:1292–1294.

21.

Husted

Hansen

Holm

, et al. What determines length of stay after total hip and knee arthroplasty? A nationwide study in Denmark. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130: 263–268.

22.

Molloy

Martin

Moschetti

, et al. Effects of the length of stay on the cost of total knee and total hip arthroplasty from 2002 to 2013. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 402–407.

23.

Stargardt

Health service costs in Europe: cost and reimbursement of primary hip replacement in nine countries. Health Econ 2008; 17(Suppl. 1): S9–S20.

24.

Draugalis

Coons

Plaza

CM.

Best practices for survey research reports: a synopsis for authors and reviewers. Am J Pharm Educ 2008; 72: 11.