In this article I discuss the empirical validity of the cartel thesis, and review three analytical dimensions of the concept: organizational change, functional change and change of party competition in Denmark, Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. I use the empirical findings to elaborate the cartel party model, with three main results. First, in Denmark and Germany party cartels have developed in different ways; second, while the cartel thesis points to important developments, some assumptions are far-fetched and we therefore have to look for the core defining elements of cartel parties; third, the favourable and unfavourable conditions facilitating or hindering the development of party cartels have to be clarified.
Beyme, Klaus von (1996) ‘Party Leadership and Change in Party Systems: Towards a Postmodern Party State?’Government and Opposition31: 135–159 .
2.
Bille, Lars (1994) ‘Denmark: The Decline of the Membership Party?’, in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize. Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 134–157. London: Sage .
3.
Bille, Lars (1999) ‘The Danish Social Democratic Party’, in Robert Ladrech and Philippe MarliËre (eds) Social Democratic Parties in the European Union. History, Organization, Policies, pp. 43–55. Houndmills: Macmillan .
4.
Borchert, Jens (2003) ‘The Political Class in Advanced Democracies: Towards a Comparative Perspective’, in Jens Borchert and Jürgen Zeiss (eds) The Political Class in Advanced democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
5.
Detterbeck, Klaus (2002) Der Wandel politischer Parteien in Westeuropa. Opladen: Leske & Budrich .
6.
Detterbeck, Klaus and Wolfgang Renzsch (2003) ‘Multi-level Electoral Competition: the German Case’ , European Urban and Regional Studies10: 257–269 .
7.
Ebbighausen, Rolf et al. (1996) Die Kosten der Parteidemokratie. Studien und Materialien zu einer Bilanz staatlicher Parteienfinanzierung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
8.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (1992) Party Organizations: a Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960–90. London: Sage .
9.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (1994) How Parties Organize. Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies. London: Sage .
10.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (1995) ‘Changing Models of Party Organizations and Party Democracy: the Emergence of the Cartel Party’ , Party Politics1: 5–28 .
11.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (2002) ‘The Ascendancy of the Party in Public Office: Party Organizational Change in Twentieth-Century Democracies', in Richard Gunther , JosÈ RamÛn Montero and Juan J. Linz (eds) Political Parties. Old Concepts and New Challenges, pp. 136–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
12.
Kitschelt, Herbert (2000) ‘Citizens, Politicians, and Party Cartellization: Political Representation and State Failure in Post-Industrial Democracies' , European Journal of Political Research37: 149–179 .
13.
Koole, Ruud (1996) ‘Cadre, Catch-all or Cartel? A Comment on the Notion of the Cartel Party’ , Party Politics2: 507–524 .
14.
Ladner, Andreas (1999) ‘Das Schweizer Parteiensystem und seine Parteien’, in Ulrich Klöti et al. (Hrsg, 1999): Handbuch der Schweizer Politik, pp. 213–260. Zürich: NZZ Verlag.
15.
Mair, Peter (1997) Party System Change. Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon .
16.
Mair, Peter and Ingrid van Biezen (2001) ‘Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980–2000’ , Party Politics7: 5–21 .
17.
Nassmacher, Karl-Heinz (1989) ‘Structure and Impact of Public Subsidies to Political Parties in Europe: the Examples of Austria, Italy, Sweden and West Germany’, in Herbert E. Alexander (ed.) Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s, pp. 236–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
18.
Pedersen, Mogens N. (1987) ‘The Danish “Working Multiparty System”: Breakdown or Adaptation?’, in Hans Daalder (ed.) Party Systems in Denmark, Austria, Switzerland, The Netherlands and Belgium, pp. 1–60. London: Pinter .
19.
Peele, Gillian (1998) ‘Towards “New Conservatives”? Organisational Reform and the Conservative Party’ , Political Quarterly69: 141–147 .
20.
Pierre, Jon et al. (2000) ‘State Subsidies to Political Parties: Confronting Rhetoric with Reality’ , West European Politics23: 1–24 .
21.
Poguntke, Thomas (1994) ‘Parties in a Legalistic Culture: the Case of Germany’, in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize. Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 185–215. London: Sage .
22.
Ragin, Charles (1987) The Comparative Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
23.
Scarrow, Susan E. (1996) Parties and Their Members. Organizing for Victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
24.
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?Oxford: Oxford University Press .
25.
Sciarini, Pascal and Simon Hug (1999) ‘The Odd Fellow: Parties and Consociationalism in Switzerland’, in Kurt Richard Luther and Kris Deschouwer (eds) Party Elites in Divided Societies. Political Parties in Consociational Democracy, pp. 134–162. London: Routledge .
26.
Skocpol, Theda and Margaret Somers (1980) ‘The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry’ , Comparative Studies in Society and History20: 174–197 .
27.
Webb, Paul D. (1999) ‘The British Labour Party’, in Robert Ladrech and Philippe MarliËre (eds) Social Democratic Parties in the European Union. History, Organization, Policies, pp. 95–109. Houndmills: Macmillan .
28.
Wiesendahl, Elmar (1999) ‘Die Parteien in Deutschland auf dem Weg zu Kartellparteien’, in Hans Herbert von Arnim (ed.) Adäquate Institutionen: Voraussetzungen für ‘gute’ und bürgernahe Politik?, pp. 49–73. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
29.
Wiesli, Reto (2003) ‘Switzerland’, in Jens Borchert and Jürgen Zeiss (eds) The Political Class in Advanced Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
30.
Young, Lisa (1998) ‘Party, State and Political Competition in Canada: the Cartel Model Reconsidered’ , Canadian Journal of Political Science31: 339–358 .
