Most political parties operate on several territorial levels, but we have only limited theoretical understanding of multi-level party dynamics. This article presents a delegation framework for studying the interaction between the national leadership and regional branches in state-wide parties. Assuming a principal—agent relationship, the national leadership can obtain benefits from delegating tasks to a regional branch, but also faces possible costs in doing this. The rules and conventions regulating the multi-level interaction in parties are possible mechanisms by which to control the actions and policies of regional branches. These include formal party rules, informal party procedures and conventions, and state laws affecting party organizations. The framework provides an agenda and hypotheses for empirical research, research that should focus on crisis situations in parties, on what regional branches cannot do (instead of just documenting the activities of branches), and on the role of parties in shaping state laws and regulations.
Bendor, Jonathan, Amihai Glazer and Thomas Hammond (2001) `Theories of Delegation', Annual Review of Political Science4: 235-69.
2.
Bille, Lars (2001) `Democratizing a Democratic Procedure: Myth or Reality?', Party Politics7: 363-80.
3.
Bradbury, Jonathan (2006) `British Political Parties and Devolution: Adapting to Multi-Level Politics in Scotland and Wales', in Dan Hough and Charlie Jeffery (eds) Devolution and Electoral Politics, pp. 214-47. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
4.
Brehm, John and Scott Gates (1997) Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Republic. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5.
Caramani, Daniele (2004) The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Carty, R. Kenneth (2004) `Parties as Franchise Systems: The Stratarchical Organizational Imperative', Party Politics10: 5-24.
7.
Chandler, William M. and Marsha A. Chandler (1987) `Federalism and Political Parties', European Journal of Political Economy3: 87-106.
8.
Chhibber, Pradeep and Ken W. Kollman (2004) The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Cox, Gary (1999) `Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination', Annual Review of Political Science2: 145-61.
10.
Deschouwer, Kris (2003) `Political Parties in Multi-Layered Systems', European Urban and Regional Studies10: 213-26.
11.
Deschouwer, Kris (2005) `Political Parties as Multi-Level Organizations' , in Richard S. Katz and William Crotty (eds) Handbook of Party Politics , pp. 291-300. London: Sage.
12.
De Winter, Lieven (2006) `Multi-Level Party Competition and Coordination in Belgium', in Dan Hough and Charlie Jeffery (eds) Devolution and Electoral Politics, pp. 79-95. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
13.
De Winter, Lieven and Huri Türsan (eds) (1998) Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. London: Routledge .
14.
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen .
15.
Gallagher, Michael and Michael Marsh (eds) (1988) Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. London: Sage.
16.
Hazan, Reuven and Paul Pennings (eds) (2001) `Candidate Selection in Western Democracies', special issue of Party Politics7, no. 3.
17.
Helmke, Gretchen and Steven Levitsky (2004) `Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda', Perspective on Politics2: 725-40.
18.
Hopkin, Jonathan (2001) `Bringing the Members Back In? Democratizing Candidate Selection in Britain and Spain', Party Politics7: 343-61.
19.
Hopkin, Jonathan (2003) `Political Decentralization, Electoral Change and Party Organizational Adaptation: A Framework for Analysis', European Urban and Regional Studies10: 227-37.
20.
Jeffery, Charlie (1999) `Party Politics and Territorial Representation in the Federal Republic of Germany', West European Politics22: 130-66.
21.
Kahler, Miles and David A. Lake (2003) `Globalization and Governance' , in Miles Kahler and David A. Lake (eds) Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition, pp. 1-30. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Katz, Richard S. (1996) `Party Organizations and Finance', in Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi and Pippa Norris (eds) Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, pp. 107-33. London: Sage.
23.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (1995) `Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party', Party Politics1: 5-28.
24.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (2002) `The Ascendancy of the Party in Public Office: Party Organizational Change in Twentieth-Century Democracies', in Richard Gunther, José Ramón Montero and Juan J. Linz (eds) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, pp. 113-35. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
25.
Keating, Michael (1998) The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
26.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick and Mathew D. McCubbins (1991) The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Knapp, Andrew and Vincent Wright (2001) The Government and Politics of France, 4th edn. London: Routledge .
28.
Koelble, Thomas A. (1996) `Economic Theories of Organizations and the Politics of Institutional Design in Political Parties', Party Politics2: 251-63.
29.
Laffin, Martin and Eric Shaw (2007) `British Devolution and the Labour Party: How a National Party Adapts to Devolution', British Journal of Politics and International Relations9: 55-72.
30.
Lehmbruch, Gerhard (2000) Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
31.
Lundell, Krister (2004) `Determinants of Candidate Selection: The Degree of Centralization in Comparative Perspective', Party Politics10: 25-47.
32.
Lupia, Arthur and Mathew D. McCubbins (2000) `Representation or Abdication? How Citizens Use Institutions to Help Delegation Succeed', European Journal of Political Research37: 291-307.
33.
Mair, Peter (1994) `Party Organizations: From Civil Society to the State', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 1-22. London : Sage.
34.
Mair, Peter (1997) Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35.
Müller, Wolfgang C. (2000) `Political Parties in Parliamentary Democracies: Making Delegation and Accountability Work', European Journal of Political Research37: 309-33.
36.
Müller, Wolfgang C. (2005) `Parties and the Institutional Framework', in Kurt R. Luther and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel (eds) Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges, pp. 249-92. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
37.
Müller, Wolfgang C. and Ulrich Sieberer (2005) `Party Law', in Richard S. Katz and William Crotty (eds) Handbook of Party Politics, pp. 435-45. London : Sage.
38.
Panebianco, Angelo (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Peters, B. Guy (1998) Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
40.
Poguntke, Thomas (1994) `Parties in a Legalistic Culture: The Case of Germany' , in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 185-215. London : Sage.
41.
Pollack, Mark A. (1997) `Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community', International Organization51: 99-134.
42.
Rodden, Jonathan (2004) `Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement', Comparative Politics36: 481-500.
43.
Roller, Elisa and Pieter van Houten (2003) `A National Party in a Regional Party System: The PSC-PSOE in Catalonia', Regional and Federal Studies13: 1-22.
44.
Russell, Meg (2005) Building New Labour: The Politics of Party Organisation . London: Palgrave.
45.
Scarrow, Susan E., Paul Webb and David M. Farrell (2000) `From Social Integration to Electoral Contestation: The Changing Distribution of Power within Political Parties', in Russell J. Dalton and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Countries , pp. 129-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
Stolz, Klaus (2003) `Moving Up, Moving Down: Political Careers across Territorial Levels', European Journal of Political Research42: 223-48.
47.
Strøm, Kaare (1990) `A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties' , American Journal of Political Science34: 565-98.
48.
Thorlakson, Lori (2009) `Patterns of Party Integration, Influence and Autonomy in Seven Federations', Party Politics15(2): 157-77.
49.
van Biezen, Ingrid (2000) `On the Internal Balance of Party Power: Party Organizations in New Democracies', Party Politics6: 395-417.
50.
van Biezen, Ingrid (2003) Political Parties in New Democracies: Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe. London: Palgrave.
51.
van Biezen, Ingrid and Jonathan Hopkin (2006) `Party Organisation in Multi-Level Contexts', in Dan Hough and Charlie Jeffery (eds) Devolution and Electoral Politics, pp. 14-36. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
52.
van Houten, Pieter (2009) `Authority in Multi-Level Parties: A Principle-Agent Framework and Cases from Germany and Spain', in Bart Maddens and Wilfried Swenden (eds) Territorial Party Politics. London: Palgrave.
53.
Wolinetz, Steven B. (2002) `Beyond the Catch-All Party: Approaches to the Study of Parties and Party Organization in Contemporary Democracies', in Richard Gunther, José Ramón Montero and Juan J. Linz (eds) Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, pp. 136-65. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
