The recently proposed (ideal) type of a modern political party, the `cartel party', evokes questions both about the conceptual clarity of the new type and about its empirical validity. The analysis of the relationship between civil society and the state, which constitutes a central element in Katz and Mair's concept of the cartel party, is considered to be too static to grasp the increased intervention by the state in society. The application of a term derived from the level of the party system (`cartel') to individual parties does not seem to be a happy choice, while the reality of western party systems does not show an effective cartel of parties. It is argued that, instead of trying to formulate (again) an alleged dominant party type for the present time, it seems more fruitful to develop a classification scheme of parties that allows for different types of parties to co-exist at the same time, without considering one of them as the most up to date.
Berger, Suzanne (1979) `Politics and Antipolitics in Western Europe in the Seventies', Daedalus (Winter 1979): 27-50.
2.
Berger, Suzanne (1981) `Introduction', in Suzanne Berger (ed.) Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism and the Transformation of Politics, pp. 1-23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Beyme, Klaus von (1994) `The Concept of Political Class - A New Dimension of Research on Elites in the Decline of the Party State?', paper presented at the symposium on `Political Parties: Changing Roles in Contemporary Democracies', Madrid, December.
4.
Duverger, Maurice (1951) Les Partis politiques. Paris: Colin.
5.
Huyse, Luc (1994) De Politiek Voorbij: En Blik op de Jaren Negentig. Kritak.
6.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (1995) `Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: the Emergence of the Cartel Party', Party Politics1(1): 5-28 (an earlier version of this article was first presented as a paper at the ECPR Joint Sessions in Limerick, Ireland, March/April 1992).
7.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair, Luciano Bardi, Lars Bille, Kris Deschouwer, David Farrell, Ruud Koole, Leonardo Morlino, Wolfgang Müller, Jon Pierre, Thomas Poguntke, Jan Sundberg, Lars Svasand, Hella van de Velde, Paul Webb and Anders Widfeldt (1992) `The Membership of Political Parties in European Democracies 1960-1990', European Journal of Political Research22: 329-345.
8.
Kirchheimer, Otto (1996) `The Transformation of West European Party Systems', in Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner (eds) Political Parties and Political Development, pp. 177-200. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Koole, Ruud (1994) `The Vulnerability of the Modern Cadre Party in the Netherlands', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 278-303. London: Sage.
10.
Landfried, Christine (1990) Parteifinanzen und politische Macht: Eine vergleichende Studie zur Bundesrepublik, zu Italien und den USA. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
11.
Leibholz, G. (1958) Strukturprobleme der modernen Demokratie. Karlsruhe: Miller Verlag.
12.
Lijphart, Arend (1975) The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, 2nd rev. edn.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
13.
Lijphart, A. (1984) Verzuiling, pacificatie en kentering in de Nederlandse politiek. Amsterdam: De Bussy (Dutch translation of The Politics of Accommodation).
14.
Meisel, J. (1958) The Myth of the Ruling Class: Gaetano Mosca and the Elite. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
15.
Ostrogorski, Mosei (1903) La démocratie et l'organisation des partis politiques. Paris: Calman-Levy.
16.
Neumann, Sigmund (1956) `Towards a Comparative Study of Political Parties', in Sigmund Neumann (ed.) Modern Political Parties, pp. 395-421. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
17.
Panebianco, Angelo (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Pizzorno, A. (1981) `Interest and Parties in Pluralism', in Suzanne Berger (ed.) Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism and the Transformation of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
19.
Refi, Karl-Heinz and Hermann Schmitt (1980) `Nine Second-order Elections: a Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results', European Journal of Political Research8: 3-44.
20.
Rose, Richard and Ian McAllister (1986) Voters Begin to Choose: From Closed-class to Open Elections in Britain. London: Sage.
21.
Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party Systems: a Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Seiler, Daniel-Louis (1986) De la comparaison des partis politiques. Paris: Economica.
23.
Sferza, Serenella (1994) `The Diminishing Returns of Dominant Models and the Shifting Advantages of Organizational Forms', paper prepared for the symposium on `Political Parties: Changing Roles in Contemporary Societies', Madrid, December.
24.
Wolinetz, Steven B. (1991) `Party System Change: The Catch-all Thesis Revisited', West European Politics14(1): 113-128.
25.
Wolinetz, Steven B. (1994) `Beyond the Catch-all Party: Approaches to the Study of Parties and Party Organization in Contemporary Democracies', paper prepared for the symposium on `Political Parties: Changing Roles in Contemporary Societies', Madrid, December.
