This article examines the relationship between the gross and net employment outcomes from the largest EU structural funding programme in the UK, the Objective 1 West Wales and the Valleys programme. The article demonstrates the practical difficulties of moving from gross to net outputs. It is suggested that these difficulties are not always explicitly considered in EU programme evaluations. One result is that, in the UK at least, previous evaluations of the relationship between gross and net employment outcomes may have overestimated the additionality of the European structural funding element.
Armstrong, H. and J. Taylor (2000) Regional Economics and Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.
2.
Armstrong, H. and P. Wells (2006) `Structural Funds and the Evaluation of Community Economic Development Initiatives in the UK: A Critical Perspective', Regional Studies40(2): 259-72.
3.
Arup Economics and Planning (2000) Evaluation of RSA 1991-1995. Final report to DTI, National Assembly for Wales and Scottish Executive. Arup Economics and Planning, 13 Fitzroy Street, London, W1 6BQ. URL (consulted March 2007): http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file22008.pdf
4.
Bachtler, J. and C. Wren (2006) `Evaluation of European Cohesion Policy: Research Questions and Policy Challenges', Regional Studies40(2): 143-53.
5.
Bradley, J. (2006) `Evaluating the Impact of European Union Cohesion Policy in Less-Developed Countries and Regions', Regional Studies40(2): 189-99.
6.
Bradley, J., J. Gacs, A. Kangur and N. Lubenets (2004) `HERMIN: A Macro Model Framework for the Study of Cohesion and Transition', in J. Bradley , G. Petrakos and I. Traistaru (eds) Integration, Growth and Cohesion in an Enlarged European Union, pp. 207-41. New York: Springer.
7.
Bryan, J., C. Jones, M. Munday and A. Roberts (2004) Input-Output Tables for Wales 2000. Available from Welsh Economy Research Unit, Cardiff Business School, Colum Drive, Cardiff, CF10 3EU. URL (consulted Jan. 2008): www.cf.ac.uk/carbs/research/centres_units/weru/output.pdf
8.
De la Fuente, A. (2002a) `On the Sources of Convergence: A Close Look at the Spanish Regions', European Economic Review46: 569-99.
9.
De la Fuente, A. (2002b) The Effect of Structural Fund Spending on the Spanish Regions: An Assessment of the 1994-99 Objective 1 CSF. CEPR Discussion Paper, 3673. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. For reference information see URL (consulted Aug. 2008): http://www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP3673.asp
10.
EPRC and Fraser Associates (2002) A Feasibility Study for an Evaluation of the Impact and Added Value of the EU Structural Funds in the UK. Final report for the Department of Trade and Industry, European Policy Research Centre, University of Strathclyde , 40 George St, Glasgow, G1 1QE.
11.
European Commission (2000) The New Programming Period 2000-2006: Methodological Working Paper: WP3: Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation: An Indicative Methodology. Brussels: European Commission DG for Regional Policy and Cohesion.
12.
Gillespie, G., P. McGregor, K. Swales and Ya Ping Yin (2001) `The Displacement and Multiplier Effects of RSA: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis', Regional Studies35(2): 125-39.
13.
Gripaios, P. and P. Bishop (2006) `Objective 1 Funding in the UK: A Critical Assessment' , Regional Studies40(8): 937-52.
14.
Martin, R. and P. Tyler (2006) `Evaluating the Impact of the Structural Funds on Objective 1 Regions: An Exploratory Discussion', Regional Studies40(2): 201-10.
15.
Munday, M., D. Pickernell and A. Roberts (2001) `Regional Policy Effectiveness and Local Governance Issues: Some Welsh Perspectives', Policy Studies22(1): 51-60.
16.
National Assembly for Wales (2001) A Winning Wales. Cardiff: NafW.
17.
Oldbell3 (2005) Mid-Term Evaluation Update for Objective 1: Final Report for Welsh European Funding Office. Ludlow: Oldbell3 Economic Development and European Services. URL (consulted March 2007): http://www.wefo.wales.gov.uk/resource/2005-12-23-O1-MTEU-Final-Report6586.pdf
18.
Pacec (1993) Regional Selective Assistance, 1985-1988: An Evaluation. London: HMSO.
19.
Raines, P. (2006) `The "Trojan Horse" Effect and the Evaluation of Structural Funds in Scotland', Regional Studies40(2): 285-8.
20.
Rodriguez-Pose, A. and U. Fratesi (2004) `Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions', Regional Studies38(1): 97-113.
21.
Taylor, S., J. Bachtler and L. Polverari (2001) Information into Intelligence: Monitoring for Effective Structural Fund Programming. IQ-Net, European Policy Research Centre (EPRC), University of Strathclyde, 40 George St, Glasgow, G1 1QE.
Wren, C. (2005) `Regional Grants: Are they Worth it?', Fiscal Studies26(2): 245-75.
24.
Yorkshire and Humberside Universities Association, Milburn Trinnaman La Court and EKOS Ltd (1999) Evaluation of the Yorkshire and the Humber Objective 2 1994-1996 and 1997-1999 Programmes , synthesis report for the Government Office for Yorkshire and the Humber, June.
