This study investigated whether pre-task planning that embeds grammatical guidance to attend to a specific L2 form might be a suitable pedagogical choice in beginning-level foreign language classrooms. First-year high school students of English in Japan were asked to do an oral story-retelling task with a class partner under one of three conditions: without any prior planning (n = 17), after 5 minutes of unguided planning (n = 20), or after 5 minutes of planning with guidance in the form of a grammar handout about English relative clauses (n = 19). The resulting narratives were analyzed for task essentialness, amount and quality of use of relativization, and global complexity and fluency. It was found that the guided planning group produced more and more accurate relative clauses in their narratives than the other two groups, to both statistically significant and large degrees, while at the same time exhibiting global levels of complexity and fluency that were similar to those of the other two groups. The results show that guided planning can succeed in creating favorable conditions for striking a pedagogical balance between communication and grammar, even with high school learners at incipient levels of proficiency and under conditions that are typical of many foreign language contexts.
Bygate, M. (Convener). (2007). Towards an educational agenda for research into task-based language teaching. Colloquium, Conference on Social and Cognitive Aspects of Second Language Learning and Teaching, University of Auckland, New Zealand, 12—14 April.
2.
Browne, C., & Wada, M. (1998). Current issues in high school English teaching in Japan: An exploratory study. Language, Culture, and Curriculum , 11: 97—112.
3.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Comrie, B. (2002). Typology and language acquisition: The case of relative clauses. In A. Giaconale Ramat (Ed.), Typology and second language acquisition (pp. 19—37). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
5.
Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367—383.
6.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197—261). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Ellis, R. (1987). Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 1—20.
8.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Ellis, R. (2005a). Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3—34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.
Ellis, R. (Ed.). (2005b). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
11.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 18, 299—323.
12.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research , 3, 215—247.
13.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (1998). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354—375.
14.
Fotos, S. (2002). Structure-based interactive tasks for the EFL grammar learner. In E. Hinkel and S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 135—154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Gass, S.M. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations . Language Learning, 29, 327—345.
16.
Hakuta, K. (1981). Grammatical description versus configurational arrangement in language acquisition: The case of relative clauses in Japanese . Cognition, 9, 197—236.
17.
Izumi, S. (2003). Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative clauses by learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 53: 285—323.
18.
Kawauchi, C. (2005). The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate l2 proficiency. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 143—164). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
19.
Keck, C.M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. In J. M. Norris and L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91—131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20.
Kramer, S.H., & Rosenthal, R. (1999). Effect sizes and significance levels in small-sample research. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 59—79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach . Language Learning, 40, 387—417.
22.
Long, M.H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413—468). New York: Academic Press.
23.
Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based methodology. In G. Crookes and S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123—167). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
24.
Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83—108.
25.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) (2003). Regarding the establishment of an action plan to cultivate “Japanese with English abilities.” Retrieved 1 May 2007 from: <http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/15/03/03033101/001.pdf>
26.
Nunan, D. (1993). Task-based syllabus design: Selecting, grading, and sequencing tasks. In G. Crookes and S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 55—68). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
27.
O'Donnell, K. (2005). Japanese secondary English teachers: Negotiation of educational roles in the face of curricular reform. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 18, 300—315.
28.
Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109—148.
29.
Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77—109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30.
Ortega, L. (2007). Meaningful L2 practice in foreign language classrooms: A cognitiveinteractionist SLA perspective. In R. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practicing in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 180—207). New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Pavesi, M. (1986). Markedness, discoursal modes, and relative clause formation in a formal and an informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 38—55.
32.
Robinson, P. (2007). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks. In García-Mayo, M.D.P. (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (p. 7—27). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
33.
Sakui, K. (2004). Wearing two pairs of shoes: Language teaching in Japan. ELT Journal, 58(2), 155—163.
34.
Sangarun, J. (2005). The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 111—141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35.
Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 24: 205—214.
36.
Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Technical Report no. 9) (pp. 1—63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai`i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
37.
Shirai, Y., & Ozeki, H. (Eds.). (2007). Special issue: The L2 acquisition of relative clauses in East Asian languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 155—374.
38.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38—62.
39.
Skehan, P. (2003). Task based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1—14.
40.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183—205). New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 29, 1—15.
42.
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64—81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Thompson, B. (2006). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. New York: Guilford.
44.
TOFL Seminar. (2005). TOEIC, TOEFL Test no kousei to eikenhikaku deita [Data of Comparison among TOEIC, TOEFL and STEP test]. Retrieved 1 May 2007 from <http://www.tofl.jp/tsec/hikaku.html>
Wilkinson, L., and the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594—604.
47.
Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14, 85—106.
48.
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1—27.
