The problem of policing is often portrayed as providing sufficient personnel to sate demand. Pluralism, however, complicates the issue since the public disagree among themselves over which activities or individuals should be policed. In turn, police priorities may differ from these demands, inciting public discontent. In these circumstances, how can public policing sustain its legitimacy? Lessons can be learnt from how political theories have grappled with pluralism and legitimacy. This article analyses how three major political theorists, John Rawls, Michael Walzer and Friedrich Hayek, dealt with these issues. It mines their insights to nominate the principle of non-domination, defined as freedom from interference on an arbitrary basis, as best suited to justify policing in an era of pluralism.
Barry, B. (1991) `Exit, Voice and Loyalty', in Democracy and Power: Essays in Political Theory1, pp. 187—221. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2.
Bayley, D. (2001) `Security and Justice for All', in H. Strang and J. Braithwaite (eds) Restorative Justice and Civil Society, pp. 211—21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Benhabib, S. (2002) The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
Cohen, J. (2003) `For a Democratic Society', in S. Freeman (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Rawls , pp. 86—138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Cornes, R. and T. Sandler (1996) The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods (2nd edn). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
6.
Crawford, A., S. Lister, S. Blackburn and J. Burnett (2005) Plural Policing: The Mixed Economy of Visible Patrols in England and Wales. Bristol: Policy Press.
7.
Dryzek, J. (2001) `Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy' , Political Theory29(5): 651—69.
8.
Elster, J. (1992) Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Fung, A. (2004) Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
Gutmann, A. (2003) `Rawls on the Relationship between Liberalism and Democracy', in S. Freeman (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Rawls, pp. 168—99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Habermas, J. (1995) `Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism', Journal of Philosophy92(3): 101—31.
12.
Hayek, F. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty. New York: John Wiley.
13.
Herbert, S. (2006) `Tangled Up in Blue: Conflicting Paths to Police Legitimacy', TheoreticalCriminology10(4): 481—504.
14.
Hibbing, J. and E. Theiss-Morse (forthcoming) `Voice, Validation and Legitimacy ', in B. Sullivan, J. Sullivan and M. Snyder (eds) Cooperation and Its Consequences for Public Life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
Hindess, B. (2001) `Power, Government, Politics', in K. Nash and A. Scott (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, pp. 40—8. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
16.
Hirschman, A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Hope, T. (2001) `Crime Victimisation and Inequality', in R. Matthews and J. Pitts (eds) Crime, Disorder and Community Safety, pp. 193—218. London: Routledge.
18.
Johnston, L. (2000) Policing Britain: Risk, Security and Governance . Harlow: Longman.
19.
Johnston, L. and C. Shearing (2003) Governing Security: Explorations in Policing and Justice. London: Routledge.
20.
Jones, T. and T. Newburn (2001) Widening Access: Improving Police Relations with Hard to Reach Groups. London: Home Office.
21.
Jones, T. and T. Newburn (2002) `The Transformation of Policing: Understanding Current Trends in Policing Systems', British Journal of Criminology42(1): 129—46.
22.
Kemshall, H. (2003) Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice. Berkshire: Open University Press.
23.
Loader, I. (2000) `Plural Policing and Democratic Governance', Social and Legal Studies9(3): 323—46.
24.
Loader, I. (2006) `Policing, Recognition and Belonging', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences605: 202—21.
25.
Loader, I. and A. Mulcahy (2003) Policing and the Condition of England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
Loader, I. and N. Walker (2001) `Policing as a Public Good: Reconstituting the Connections between Policing and the State', TheoreticalCriminology5(1): 9—35.
27.
Loader, I. and N. Walker (2004) `State of Denial? Rethinking the Governance of Security', Punishment and Society6(2): 221—8.
28.
Loader, I. and N. Walker (2006) `Necessary Virtues: The Legitimate Place of the State in the Production of Security', in J. Wood and B. Dupont (eds) Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security, pp. 165—96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Mastrofski, S. (2006) `Community Policing: A Skeptical View', in D. Weisburd and A.A. Braga (eds) Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives , pp. 44—73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Miller, D. (1995) `Complex Equality', in D. Miller and M. Walzer (eds) Pluralism, Justice and Equality, pp. 197—225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Morris, A. and L. Gelsthorpe (2000) `Re-visioning Men's Violence against Female Partners ', The Howard Journal39(4) 412—28.
32.
Nicholas, S. and A. Walker (eds) (2004) Crime in England and Wales 2002/2003: Supplementary Volume 2: Crime, Disorder and the Criminal Justice System—Public Attitudes and Perceptions. Home Office Statistical Bulletin 02/04. London: Home Office.
33.
O' Malley, P. and D. Palmer (1996) `Post-Keynesian Policing', Economy and Society25(2): 137—55.
34.
Pettit, P. (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35.
Pettit, P. (2000) `Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory', Nomos42: 105—44.
36.
Pettit, P. (2004) `The Common Good', in K. Dowding, R.E. Goodin and C. Pateman (eds) Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry, pp. 150—69. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Pettit, P. (2005a) `The Domination Complaint', Nomos46: 87—117.
38.
Pettit, P. (2005b) `Rawls's Political Ontology', Politics, Philosophy and Economics4(2): 157—74.
39.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
40.
Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York : Columbia University Press.
41.
Rawls, J. (1997) `The Idea of Public Reason Revisited', University of Chicago Law Review64(3): 765—807.
42.
Shapiro, I. (1999) Democratic Justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
Shapiro, I. (2003) The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Shearing, C. (2006) `Reflections on the Refusal to Acknowledge Private Governments', in J. Wood and B. Dupont (eds) Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security, pp. 11—32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Shearing, C. and J. Wood (2003) `Governing Security for Common Goods', International Journal of the Sociology of Law31(3): 205—25.
46.
Skogan, W. (2006a) `The Promise of Community Policing', in D. Weisburd and A.A. Braga (eds) Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives, pp. 27—43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Skogan, W. (2006b) `Community Policing and the New Immigrants: Latinos in Chicago', in M. King (ed.) Justice and Safety in America's Immigrant Communities, pp. 43—64. Princeton, NJ: Policy Research Institute for the Region .
48.
Stenson, K. (2005) `Sovereignty, Biopolitics and the Local Government of Crime in Britain', Theoretical Criminology9(3): 265—87.
49.
Tyler, T. (1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
50.
Tyler, T. (2003) `Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law', in M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 30, pp. 283—357. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Tyler, T., R. Boeckmann, H. Smith and Y.J. Huo (1997) Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Denver, CO: Westview.
52.
Wakefield, A. (2000) `Situational Crime Prevention in Mass Private Property ', in A. von Hirsch, D. Garland and A. Wakefield (eds) Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, pp. 125—46. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
53.
Waldron, J. (1993) Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981—91 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
