This study investigates the language development of 2- to 3-year-old Turkish—Dutch bilingual children with different amounts of input quantity. Developmental patterns in spontaneous speech data of the bilingual children are compared to those of monolingual children of the same age. It is found that low input quantity leads to slower grammatical development, but only if input is clearly reduced. The observation that not only mean length of utterance but also the development of finiteness can show pronounced delays in bilingual language acquisition contradicts maturational views of grammatical development. However, such overall delays are expected given input-based theories of grammatical acquisition. All four bilingual children show difficulties in establishing the relation between finiteness and expression of grammatical subjects in Dutch. It is argued that cross-linguistic influence, driven by surface overlap between Turkish and Dutch, may account for this observation.
Arriaga, R.K., Fenson, L., Cronan, T., & Pethick, S.J. ( 1998). Scores on the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory of children from low- and middle-income families. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(2), 209-225.
2.
Backus, A., & Van Der Heijden, A. ( 1998). Life and birth of a bilingual: The mixed code of bilingual children and adults in the Turkish community in the Netherlands. In L. Johanson (Ed.), The Mainz Meeting: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Turkish Linguistics (pp. 527-551). Wiesbaden : Harrassowitz Verlag.
3.
Backus, A., & Van Der Heijden, A. ( 2002). Language mixing by young Turkish children in the Netherlands . Psychology of Language and Communication, 6(1), 55-73.
4.
Bernardini, P., & Schlyter, S. ( 2004). Growing syntactic structure and code-mixing in the weaker language: The Yvy hypothesis. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition , 7(1): 49-70.
5.
Blom, E. ( 2008a). The acquisition of finiteness. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
6.
Blom, E. ( 2008b). Testing the Domain-by-Age Model: Inflection and placement of Dutch verbs. In B. Hazendar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition (pp. 271-300). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
7.
Blom, E., & Van Geert, P. ( 2004). Signs of a developing grammar: Subject drop and inflection in early child Dutch. Linguistics, 42(1), 195-234.
8.
Brown, R. ( 1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Bybee, J. ( 2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
10.
Bybee, J. ( 2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
11.
Clark, E.V. ( 1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
12.
Craig, H.K., & Washington, J.A. (2004). Grade-related changes in the production of African American English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(April), 450-463.
13.
Crain, S. ( 1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience . Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 597-612.
14.
De Haan, G. ( 1987). A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch. In G. de Haan & W. Zonneveld (Eds.), Formal Parameters of Generative Grammar: OTS Yearbook 1987 (pp. 15-30). Dordrecht: ICG.
15.
De Houwer, A. ( 1995). Bilingual language acquisition. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp. 219-250). Oxford: Blackwell.
16.
Döpke, S. ( 1998). Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children. Journal of Child Language, 25(3), 555-584.
17.
Ensminger, M.E., & Fothergill, K. (2003). A decade of measuring SES: What it tells us and where to go from here. In M. H. Bornstein & R. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 13-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J.M., Aguado-Orea, J., & Gobet, F. ( 2007). Modelling the developmental patterning of finiteness marking in English, Dutch, German and Spanish using MOSAIC. Cognitive Science, 31(2), 311-341.
19.
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J.M., & Gobet, F. ( 2006). Modelling the development of children’s use of optional infinitives in English and Dutch using MOSAIC. Cognitive Science, 30(2), 277-310.
20.
Gathercole, V.C.M. ( 2002a). Command of the mass/count distinction in bilingual and monolingual children: An English morphosyntactic distinction. In D. K. Oller & R. E. Eilers (Eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 175-206). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
21.
Gathercole, V.C.M. ( 2002b). Grammatical gender in bilingual and monolingual children: A Spanish morphosyntactic distinction. In D. K. Oller & R. E. Eilers (Eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 207-219). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
22.
Gathercole, V.C.M. ( 2002c). Monolingual and bilingual acquisition: Learning different treatments of that-trace phenomena in English and Spanish. In D. K. Oller & R. E. Eilers (Eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 220-254). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
23.
Genesee, F. ( 2001). Bilingual first language acquisition: Exploring the limits of the language faculty. In M. McGroarty (Ed.), Annual Review of Applied linguistics: Language and Psychology Vol. 21 (pp. 153-168). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Haegeman, L. ( 1994). Root infinitives, tense and truncated structures . Language Acquisition, 4(3), 205-255.
25.
Hoff, E. ( 2006). How social contexts support and shape language development . Developmental Review, 26(1), 55-88.
26.
Hoff, E., & Naigles, L. ( 2002). How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development, 73(2), 418- 433.
27.
Hornstein, N., & Lightfoot, D. ( 1981). Introduction. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (Eds.), Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition (pp. 9-31). London : Longman.
28.
Hulk, A., & Müller, N. (2000). Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 227-244.
29.
Jansen, F. ( 1981). Syntaktische konstrukties in gesproken taal. Amsterdam: Huis aan Drie Grachten.
30.
Krämer, I. ( 1993). The licensing of subjects in early child language . In C. Phillips (Ed.), Papers on case and agreement II (MIT working papers in linguistics19: pp. 197-212), Cambridge, MA : MIT Deptartment of Linguistics and Philosophy.
Macwhinney, B. ( 2008). URL (consulted 3 September 2009): http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/clan.pdf
33.
Malvern, D.D., & Richards, B.J. (1997). A new measure of lexical diversity. In A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving models of language (pp. 58-71). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
34.
Meisel, J.M. ( 2001). The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. In J. Cenoz & F. Genesee (Eds.), Trends in bilingual acquisition (pp. 11- 41). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
35.
Meisel, J.M. ( 2007). The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language? Applied Psycholinguistics , 28(3), 495-514.
36.
Meisel, J.M. ( 2008). Child second language acquisition or successive first language acquisition? In B. Hazendar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition (pp. 55-80). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA : John Benjamins.
37.
Newport, E.L., & Aslin, R.N. ( 2004). Learning at a distance: Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 127-162.
38.
Nicoladis, E., & Genesee, F. ( 1997). Language development in preschool bilingual children . Journal of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, 21(4), 258-270.
39.
Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E. (Eds.) (2002). Language and literacy in bilingual children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
40.
Paradis, J. ( 2010). Comparing typically developing children and children with specific language impairment. In E. Blom & S. Unsworth (Eds.) Experimental methods in language acquisition research. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
41.
Paradis, J., Crago, M., Genesee, F., & Rice, M. ( 2003). French-English bilingual children with SLI: How do they compare with their monolingual peers?Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46(February), 113-127.
42.
Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. ( 1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 18(1), 1-25.
43.
Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E., & Crago, M. ( 2007). French-English bilingual children’s acquisition of the past tense. Proceedings of BUCLD31. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
44.
Pearson, B.Z., Fernández, S.C., Lewedeg, V., & Oller, D.K. ( 1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 41-58.
45.
Poeppel, D., & Wexler, K. ( 1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69(1), 1-33.
46.
Radford, A. ( 1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax . Oxford: Blackwell.
47.
Rice, M. ( 2004). Growth models of developmental language disorders . In M. Rice & S. Warren (Eds.), Developmental language disorders (pp. 207-204). Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum .
48.
Rizzi, L. ( 1993/1994). Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition, 3(4), 371-393.
49.
Schlyter, S. ( 1993). The weaker language in bilingual Swedish-French children . In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (Eds.), Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives (pp. 289-308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Schlyter, S., & Håkansson, G. (1994). Word order in Swedish as the first language, second language, and weaker language in bilinguals . Scandinavian Working Papers on Bilingualism, 9, 49-66.
51.
Snow, C.E. ( 1999). Social perspectives on the emergence of language . In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 257-276). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52.
Theakston, A., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. ( 2003). The role of input in the acquisition of third-person singular verbs in English. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46(August), 863-877.
53.
Thompson, S.P., & Newport, E.L. ( 2007). Statistical learning of syntax: The role of transitional probability. Language Learning and Development, 3(1), 1- 42.
54.
Tomasello, M. ( 2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55.
Weerman, F. ( 1989). The V2 Conspiracy: A synchronic and diachronic analysis of verbal positions in the Germanic languages. Dordrecht : Foris.
56.
Wexler, K. ( 1991). On the argument from the poverty of the stimulus . In A. Kasher (Ed.), The Chomskyan Turn (pp. 252-270). Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
57.
Wexler, K. ( 1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106(1-4), 23-79.
58.
Wexler, K. ( 2003). Lenneberg’s dream: Learning, normal language development and specific language impairment. In Y. Levy & J. Schaeffer (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Towards a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 11-61). Mahwah NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
59.
Wijnen, F. ( 2000). Input, intake and sequence of syntactic development . In M. Beers, B. van den Bogaerde, G. Bol, J. de Jong & C. Rooijmans (Eds.), From sound to sentence (pp. 163-186). Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition .
60.
Wijnen, F., & Bol, G. ( 1993). The escape from the optional infinitive stage . In A. de Boer, J. de Jong & R. Landeweerd (Eds.), Language and Cognition 3: Yearbook of the research group for theoretical and experimental linguistics of the University of Groningen (pp. 105-118). Groningen: Center for Language and Cognition.
61.
Yip, V., & Matthews, S. ( 2000). Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese-English bilingual child . Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 193-208.
