Asymmetric Language Switch Benefits From Comprehension to Production in Chinese Learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL): Rethinking Cross-Modality Language Control

Abstract

Aims and Objectives:

This study examined whether bilingual language control is shared across comprehension and production or supported by separate mechanisms in a dissimilar language pair. Specifically, we investigated whether Chinese learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) show asymmetric switch costs in comprehension-to-production (C-to-P) language switching.

Design:

Thirty-three Chinese EFL learners completed a joint language switch paradigm combining picture naming (production) and semantic categorization (comprehension). Language switching in picture naming was triggered by interleaved categorization in Chinese or English.

Data and Analysis:

Reaction times were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models.

Findings:

Participants showed a switch benefit in the L1 naming block but no switch effect in the L2 block. This asymmetry is inconsistent with both shared- and separate-control accounts and instead suggests a major contribution of modality control, particularly in the L1 block.

Originality:

The study provides initial evidence for asymmetric switch benefits in C-to-P language switching and highlights language similarity as a key factor of modality and cross-modality language control.

Implications:

We propose the Multimodal Inhibitory Control (MIC) model as a framework for predicting control demands across tasks, language pairs, and dominance profiles.

Keywords

language control language comprehension language production Chinese learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL)Multimodal Inhibitory Control (MIC) model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

Abbott

M. J.

Rayner

Ferreira

V. S.

Gollan

T. H.

(2020). Minimal overlap in language control across production and comprehension: Evidence from read-aloud versus eye-tracking tasks. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 54, 100885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100885

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Blanco-Elorrieta

Pylkkänen

(2016). Bilingual language control in perception versus action: MEG reveals comprehension control mechanisms in anterior cingulate cortex and domain-general control of production in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(2), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2597-15.2016

Bonfieni

Branigan

H. P.

Pickering

M. J.

Sorace

(2019). Language experience modulates bilingual language control: The effect of proficiency, age of acquisition, and exposure on language switching. Acta Psychologica, 193, 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.11.004

Chai

Bao

(2023). Linguistic distances between native languages and Chinese influence acquisition of Chinese character, vocabulary, and grammar. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1083574. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1083574

Chen

Zhao

Zhaxi

Liu

(2020). How does parallel language activation affect switch costs during trilingual language comprehension? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 32(5–6), 526–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2020.1788036

Costa

Santesteban

(2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002

Coumel

Liu

Trenkic

de Bruin

(2024). Do accent and input modality modulate processing of language switches in bilingual language comprehension? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 50(4), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001190

de Bruin

. (2023). Language switching in different contexts and modalities: Response-stimulus interval influences cued-naming but not voluntary-naming or comprehension language-switching costs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26(2), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000554

10.

Declerck

Koch

(2023). The concept of inhibition in bilingual control. Psychological Review, 130(4), 953–976. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000367

11.

Declerck

Koch

Duñabeitia

J. A.

Grainger

Stephan

D. N.

(2019). What absent switch costs and mixing costs during bilingual language comprehension can tell us about language control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(6), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000627

12.

Declerck

Philipp

A. M.

(2015). A review of control processes and their locus in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(6), 1630–1645. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0836-1

13.

Dryer

M. S.

Haspelmath

(Eds.). (2013). WALS online (v2020.4). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591

14.

Gambi

Hartsuiker

R. J.

(2016). If you stay, it might be easier: Switch costs from comprehension to production in a joint switching task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(4), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000190

15.

Grainger

Beauvillain

(1987). Language blocking and lexical access in bilinguals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 39(2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748708401788

16.

Grainger

Dijkstra

(1992). On the representation and use of language information in bilinguals. In Harris

R. J.

(Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 207–220). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61496-X

17.

Grainger

Midgley

Holcomb

P. J.

(2010). Re-thinking the bilingual interactive-activation model from a developmental perspective (BIA-d). In Kail

Hickmann

(Eds.), Language acquisition and language disorders (Vol. 52, pp. 267–283). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.52.18gra

18.

Green

D. W.

(1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133

19.

Green

D. W.

Abutalebi

(2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377

20.

Green

D. W.

Wei

(2014). A control process model of code-switching. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(4), 499–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.882515

21.

Jackson

G. M.

Swainson

Mullin

Cunnington

Jackson

S. R.

(2004). ERP correlates of a receptive language-switching task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000198

22.

Jiang

(2023). The study of bilingual language processing. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852384.001.0001

23.

Kroll

J. F.

Stewart

(1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008

24.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H. B.

(2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

25.

Lemhöfer

Broersma

(2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0

26.

Gollan

T. H.

(2022). Language-switch costs from comprehension to production might just be task-switch costs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(3), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921001061

27.

Zhang

Zhao

(2020). Language history questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(5), 938–944. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001153

28.

Chen

(2024). The role of second language reading proficiency in moderating second language word recognition. Education Sciences, 14(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020193

29.

Liu

Guo

Jiang

Schwieter

J. W.

Wang

(2023). Neural circuits underlying language control and modality control in bilinguals: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 178, 108430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108430

30.

Liu

de Bruin

(2021). Should I focus on self-language actions or should I follow others? Cross-language interference effects in voluntary and cued language switching. Acta Psychologica, 216, 103308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103308

31.

Wang

Guo

Zeng

Zheng

Wang

Shao

Wang

(2019). The roles of relative linguistic proficiency and modality switching in language switch cost: Evidence from Chinese visual unimodal and bimodal bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9519-6

32.

Meuter

R. F. I.

Allport

(1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2602

33.

Momenian

Privitera

A. J.

Weekes

(2024). Nouns are not always processed faster than verbs in bilingual speakers: Effects of language distance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 27(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728923000408

34.

Moon

Jiang

(2012). Non-selective lexical access in different-script bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000022

35.

Mosca

(2019). Trilinguals’ language switching: A strategic and flexible account. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818763537

36.

Olson

D. J.

(2017). Bilingual language switching costs in auditory comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(4), 494–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1250927

37.

Peeters

Runnqvist

Bertrand

Grainger

(2014). Asymmetrical switch costs in bilingual language production induced by reading words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(1), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034060

38.

Perfetti

C. A.

Zhang

Berent

(1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In Frost

Katz

(Eds.), Advances in psychology (Vol. 94, pp. 227–248). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62798-3

39.

Perrone-Bertolotti

Kujala

Vidal

J. R.

Hamame

C. M.

Ossandon

Bertrand

Minotti

Kahane

Jerbi

Lachaux

J.-P.

(2012). How silent is silent reading? Intracerebral evidence for top-down activation of temporal voice areas during reading. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(49), 17554–17562. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2982-12.2012

40.

Philipp

A. M.

Gade

Koch

(2007). Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440600758812

41.

Schepens

Dijkstra

Grootjen

van Heuven

W. J. B.

(2013). Cross-language distributions of high frequency and phonetically similar cognates. PLOS ONE, 8(5), Article e63006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063006

42.

Severens

Van Lommel

Ratinckx

Hartsuiker

R. J.

(2005). Timed picture naming norms for 590 pictures in Dutch. Acta Psychologica, 119(2), 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.01.002

43.

Snodgrass

J. G.

Vanderwart

(1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174

44.

Thomas

M. S. C.

Allport

(2000). Language switching costs in bilingual visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2700

45.

Van Assche

Duyck

Gollan

T. H

. (2016). Linking recognition and production: Cross-modal transfer effects between picture naming and lexical decision during first and second language processing in bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.02.003

46.

van Heuven

W. J. B.

Dijkstra

Grainger

. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 458–483. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2584

47.

Wang

Koda

Perfetti

C. A.

(2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00232-9

48.

Wong

W. L.

Maurer

(2021). The effects of input and output modalities on language switching between Chinese and English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(4), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672892100002X

49.

Yang

Cooc

Sheng

(2017). An investigation of cross-linguistic transfer between Chinese and English: A meta-analysis. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0036-9

50.

Zhang

Yang

(2003). 影响图画命名时间的因素 [The determiners of picture-naming latency]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35, 447–454.

51.

Zhou

Chen

Yang

Dunlap

(2010). Language nonselective access to phonological representations: Evidence from Chinese–English bilinguals. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(10), 2051–2066. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003718705

52.

Ziegler

J. C.

Tan

L. H.

Perry

Montant

(2000). Phonology matters: The phonological frequency effect in written Chinese. Psychological Science, 11(3), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00247

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB