In this paper we provide a quantitative analysis of the behavior of nouns in two generations of speakers from a bilingual community in northern Cyprus. Diagnostics from three areas of grammar—phonology, morphology, and syntax—provide corroborating evidence that when a lone noun, of either English or Turkish origin, appears in contexts in which it is surrounded by the other language, it patterns systematically in accordance with its counterparts in that other language. On the other hand, when a lone noun, either English or Turkish, appears within a multiword fragment of English or Turkish, it patterns overwhelmingly with the language of its etymology. The strikingly different grammatical patterns highlight the fact that they represent two different types of behavior: borrowing in the former; codeswitching in the latter. These findings demonstrate that empirical investigation can disambiguate the community-specific status of language contact phenomena. Further, contrastive analysis across generations reveals that although the generations differ in the frequency with which they use Turkish and English, they employ the same strategies when they do. These strategies have far more to do with their preferred language of discourse, than with any purely linguistic factor.
ADALAR, N., (1996). Nominals: Linguistic variation in Turkish-English bilinguals in Cyprus. MA dissertation, University of York.
2.
BACKUS, A., (1992). Patterns of language mixing: A study in Turkish-Dutch bilingualism. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
3.
BACKUS, A., (1993). Turkish-Dutch codeswitching and the frame-process model. In G. Extra & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Immigrant languages in Western Europe (pp. 224–235). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
4.
BELAZI, H. M., RUBIN, E. J., & TORIBIO, A. J., (1994). Code switching and X-bar theory: The functional head constraint. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(2), 221–237.
5.
BLOOMFIELD, L., (1927). Literate and illiterate speech. American Speech, 2, 432–439.
6.
BUDZHAK-JONES, S., & POPLACK, S., (1997). Two generations, two strategies: The fate of bare English-origin nouns in Ukrainian. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 1(2), 225–258.
7.
CLARK, J., & YALLOP, C., (1995). An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
CLEMENTS, G. N., & SEZER, E., (1982). Vowel and consonant disharmony in Turkish. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations. (pp. 213–255). Dordrecht: Foris.
9.
DI SCIULLO, A.-M., MUYSKEN, P., & SINGH, R., (1986). Government and codemixing. Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 1–24.
10.
EZE, E., (1995a). Borrowed verbs: Evidence from Igbo-English bilingual discourse. Paper presented at Canadian Linguistic Association. UQAM.
11.
EZE, E., (1995b). Where do they belong?: Determining the status of lone English-origin nouns in Igbo discourse. Paper presented at NWAVE. University of Pennsylvania.
12.
EZE, E., (1997). Aspects of language contact: A variationist approach to codeswitching and borrowing in Igbo-English bilingual discourse. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ottawa.
13.
GIVÓN, T., (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14.
HAUGEN, E., (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 26(2), 210–231.
15.
JOSHI, A. K., (1985). Processing of sentences with intrasentential codeswitching. In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational and theoretical perspectives (pp. 190–204). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KLAVANS, J. L., (1985). The syntax of codeswitching: Spanish and English. In L. D. King & C. A. Maley (Eds.), Selected papers from the XIIIth linguistic symposium on Romance languages (pp. 213–221). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
17.
KOÇ, N., (1990). Yeni dilbilgisi. Istanbul: Inkilap Kitabevi Yayin.
18.
LABOV, W., (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics (pp. 28–54). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
19.
LEWIS, G. L., (1975). Turkish grammar. London: Oxford University Press.
20.
LYONS, J., (1982). Phonemic and nonphonemic phonology: Some typological reflections. International Journal of American Linguistics, 28(2), 127–133.
21.
MEECHAN, M., & POPLACK, S., (1995). Orphan categories and adjectival expression: A comparative study of Wolof-French and Fongbe-French bilingual discourse. Language Variation and Change, 7(2), 169–194.
22.
MEECHAN, M., TAGLIAMONTE, S., & POPLACK, S., (1996). Isolating systems in language contact: A variationist method. Paper presented at Methods IX. Bangor, Wales.
23.
MILROY, L., & WEI, L., (1995). A social network approach to codeswitching: The example of a bilingual community in Britain. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker, two languages (pp. 136–157). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
24.
MUYSKEN, P., (1987). Neutrality in code mixing. In Eigen en Vreemd: Identiteit en ontlening in taal, literatuur en beeldende kunst: Handelingen van het 39ste Nederlands Filologencongres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 18–19 December, 1986 (pp. 359–373). Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.
25.
MYERS-SCOTTON, C., (1993a). Common and uncommon ground: Social and structural factors in codeswitching. Language in Society, 22(4), 475–503.
PFAFF, C. W., (1979). Constraints on language mixing. Language, 55(2), 291–318.
28.
POPLACK, S., (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish Y TERMINO EN ESPAÑOL: Toward a typology of codeswitching. Linguistics, 18(7/8), 581–618.
29.
POPLACK, S., (1985). Contrasting patterns of codeswitching in two communities. In H. Warkentyne (Ed.), Methods V: Papers from the Fifth International Conference on methods in dialectology (pp. 363–386). Victoria: University of Victoria Press.
30.
POPLACK, S., (1987). Contrasting patterns of codeswitching in two communities. In J. E. Wande Anward, B. Nordberg, L. Steensland, M. Thelander (Eds.), Aspects of bilingualism: Proceedings from the Fourth Nordic Symposium on Bilingualism, 1984. Uppsala: Borgström.
31.
POPLACK, S., (1988). Language status and language accommodation along a linguistic border. In P. Lowenberg (Ed.), Language spread and language policy: Issues, implications and case studies, GURT 87 (pp. 90–118). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
32.
POPLACK, S., (1990). Variation theory and language contact: Concepts, methods and data. In Papers for the workshop on concepts, methodology and data. (pp. 33–65). Basel: European Science Foundation.
33.
POPLACK, S., (1993). Variation theory and language contact. In D. Preston (Ed.), American dialect research: An anthology celebrating the 100th anniversary of the American Dialect Society (pp. 251–286). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34.
POPLACK, S., & MEECHAN, M., (1995). Patterns of language mixture: Nominal structure in Wolof-French and Fongbe-French bilingual discourse. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One Speaker, two Languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on codeswitching (pp. 199–232). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
35.
POPLACK, S., SANKOFF, D., & MILLER, C., (1988). The social correlates and linguistic processes of lexical borrowing and assimilation. Linguistics, 26(1), 47–104.
36.
POPLACK, S., WHEELER, S., & WESTWOOD, A., (1987). Distinguishing language contact phenomena: Evidence from Finnish-English bilingualism. In P. Lilius & M. Saari (Eds.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics. (pp. 33–56). Helsinki: University of Helsinki Press.
37.
RONA, B., (1995). Turkish in three months. Suffolk: Hugo.
38.
SANKOFF, D., & POPLACK, S., (1981). A formal grammar for codeswitching. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication, 14(1), 3–45.
39.
SANKOFF, D., POPLACK, S., & VANNIARAJAN, S., (1990). The case of the nonce loan in Tamil. Language Variation and Change, 2(1), 71–101.
40.
SANTORINI, B., & MAHOOTIAN, S., (1995). Codeswitching and the syntactic status of adnominal adjectives. Lingua, 96, 1–27.
41.
TREFFERS-DALLER, J., (1997). Variability in codeswitching styles: Turkish-German codeswitching patterns. In R. Jacobson (Ed.), Code-switching world wide: Evidence from four continents. (pp. 177–197). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
42.
TÜRKER, E., (1993). “Fremmedord bilmiyom.” A sociolinguistic study of second generation Immigrant Turkish in Norway. MA dissertation, University of Oslo.
43.
TURPIN, D., (1996). Le français c'est le last frontier: Le syntagme nominal dans le discours bilingue français/anglais. M.A., University of Ottawa.
44.
WATERSON, N., (1970). Phonology of the nominal forms of the Turkish word. In R. Palmer (Ed.), Prosodic analysis (pp. 174–187). London: Oxford.
45.
WEINREICH, U., (1953/1968). Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.
