In visual search tasks, skilled adult readers of English process letters of the alphabet differently from other symbols (Hammond & Green, 1982; Mason, 1982). Less skilled (young) readers of English, and skilled readers of logographic scripts, do not show this differential processing across stimuli (Green, Hammond, & Supramaniam, 1983; Green & Meara, 1987). To test whether cognitive processing in bilinguals depends upon script combinations and language proficiency, we investigated the development of alphabetic and logographic visual search strategies in two kinds of biscriptals: Malay-English and Chinese-English readers. Our results support the view that there are scriptspecific and reader-specific differences amongst bilingual biscriptals. The implications of these effects for dual-route models of reading and stage models of reading acquisition are discussed.
Besner, D., & Smith, M.C. (1992). Basic processes in reading: Is the orthographic depth hypothesis sinking? In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp.45-66). Amsterdam , North-Holland: Elsevier.
2.
Brown, T.L., & Haynes, M. (1985). Literacy background and reading development in a second language. In T. Carr (Ed.), New directions for child development: The development of reading skills (Vol. 27, pp.19-34). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
3.
Chomsky, C. (1976). Creativity and innovation in child language. Journal of Education, 158(2), 12 - 24.
4.
Cole, R.A., & Jakimik, J. (1980). A model of speech perception. In R.A. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech (pp.133-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
Coltheart, M. (1984). Writing systems and reading disorders. In L. Henderson (Ed.), Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
Coltheart, M., Besner, D., Jonassen, J.T., & Davelaar, E. (1979). Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 489 - 507.
7.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual route and parallel distributed approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
8.
Estes, W.K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics ,12, 278-286.
9.
Fitts, P.M. (1951). Engineering psychology and equipment design. In S.S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp.1287-1340). New York: Wiley.
10.
Forster, K.I., & Chambers, S.M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627-635.
11.
Frith, U.( 1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.
12.
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia: Are comparisons between developmental and acquired disorders meaningful? In K. Patterson, J.C. Marshall & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Cognitive and neuro-psychological studies of phonological reading. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115.
14.
Green, D., & Meara, P. (1987). The effects of script on visual search. Second Language Research, 3, 102-117.
15.
Green, D.W., Hammond, E.J., & Supramaniam, S. (1983). Letters and shapes: Developmental changes in search strategies. British Journal of Psychology , 74, 11-16.
16.
Green, D., Rickard Liow, S.J., Tng, S.K., & Zielinski, S. (1996). Are visual search procedures adapted to the nature of the script ?British Journal of Psychology, 87, 311-326.
17.
Haber, R.N., & Standing, L.G. (1969). Location of errors with a poststimulus indicator. Psychonomic Science, 17, 345-346.
18.
Hammond, E.J., & Green, D.W. (1982). Detecting targets in letter and non letter arrays . Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 67-82.
19.
Harris, M., & Coltheart, M. (1986). Language processing in children and adults: An introduction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
20.
Koda, K. (1989). Effects of L1 orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 210-222.
21.
Low, C.-G.I. (1995). Cognitive functional assessment of developmental dyslexia: case study evaluation. Unpublished honours thesis, Department of Social Work and Psychology, National University of Singapore .
22.
Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V., & Desberg, P. (1981). A cognitive-developmental theory of reading acquisition . In G.E. Mackinnon & T.G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. New York: Academic Press.
23.
Mason, M.( 1975). Reading ability and letter search time: Effects of orthographic structure defined bysingle-letter positional frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 146 - 166.
24.
Mason, M. (1982). Recognition time for letters and nonletters: Effect of serial position, array size, and processing order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 724-738.
25.
Mason, M., & Katz, L. (1976). Visual processing of nonlinguistic strings: Redundancy effects and readingability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 338-348.
26.
Merikle, P.M., Lowe, D.G., & Coltheart, M. (1971). Familiarity and methods of report as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology , 25, 167-174.
27.
Nazir, T.A., O'Regan, J.K., & Jacobs, A.M. (1991). On words and their letters. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 171-174.
28.
Posner, M.I., & Snyder, C.R.R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R.L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
Rickard Liow, S.J., Green, D., & Lokanathan, K. (1995). Visual search processes in bilinguals. Paper presented at Seventh International Conference on the Cognitive Processing of Asian Languages , Hong Kong.
31.
Schwantes, F.M. (1978). Stimulus position functions in tachistoscopic identification tasks: Scanning, rehearsal, and order of report. Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 19-226.
32.
Segalowitz, N. (1986). Skilled reading in the second language. In J. Vaid (Ed.), Language processingin bilinguals (pp.3-19). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33.
Smith, M.C., & Ramunas, S. (1971). Elimination of visual field effects by use of a single report technique: Evidence for order of report artifact. Journal of Experimental Psychology ,87, 23-28.
34.
Stanovich, K., West, R., & Freeman, D. (1981). A longitudinal study of sentence context effects in second-grade children: Tests of an interactive compensatory model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 185-199.
35.
Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions . Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
36.
Umilta, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R.W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve, (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp.89-116). Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier Science.
37.
West, R., & Stanovich, K. (1978). Automatic contextual facilitation in readers of three ages. Child Development, 49, 717-727.
