A study is reported that focused on the role of self-anchoring in the definition of social groups. We assumed that group members give meaning to a novel ingroup by defining it as similar to the self. Moreover, the need and ability to engage in cognitive structuring should affect this process. A minimal group study in which self, ingroup and outgroup evaluations were obtained supported these hypotheses. Regression analysis revealed that self-evaluations predicted ingroup evaluations, but that this effect was qualified by an interaction with ability and need for cognitive structuring. Participants high both in the need for cognitive structure and the ability to achieve cognitive structure relied most heavily on the self as a heuristic for ingroup evaluations.
Ajzen, I , & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
2.
Aron, A. , Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241-253.
3.
Baldwin, M. W. , Carrell, S. E., & Lopez, D. F. (1990). Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the pope are watching me from the back of my mind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 435-454.
4.
Bar-Tal, Y. (1994). The effect of need and ability to achieve cognitive structure on mundane decision-making. European Journal of Personality, 8, 45-58.
5.
Bar-Tal, Y. , & Guinote, A. (in press). Who exhibit more stereotypical thinking? The effect of need and ability to achieve cognitive structure on stereotyping. European Journal of Personality.
6.
Bar-Tal, Y. , Kishon-Rabin, L., & Tabak, N. (1997). The effect of need and ability to achieve cognitive structuring on cognitive structuring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1158-1176.
7.
Bar-Tal, Y. , Raviv, A., & Spitzer, A. (1999). Individual differences that moderate the effect of stress on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 33-51.
8.
Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 680-740). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Blanz, M. , Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1995a). Perceptions of relative group size and group status: Effects on intergroup discrimination in negative evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 231-247.
10.
Blanz, M. , Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1995b). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination: The impact of stimulus-valence, size-and status-differentials in intergroup evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 409-419.
11.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
12.
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429-444.
13.
Brewer, M. B. , & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Linzdey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 554-594). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
15.
Cadinu, M. R. , & Rothbart, M. (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661-677.
16.
Chen, S. , & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In: S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford.
17.
Clement, R. W. , & Krueger, J. (2000). The primacy of self-referent information in social consensus. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 279-299.
18.
Coats, S. , Smith, E., Claypool, H. M., & Banner, M. J. (2000). Overlapping mental representations of self and in-group: Reaction time evidence and its relationship with explicit measures of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 304-315.
19.
Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 263-292). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
21.
Diener, E. , & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181-185.
22.
Dunlap, W. P. , & Kemery, E. R. (1987). Failure to detect moderating effects: Is multicollinearity the problem?Psychological Bulletin, 102, 418-420.
23.
Dunning, D. , & Hayes, A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 213-229.
24.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155-194.
25.
Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Forgas, J. P. , & Fiedler, K. (1996). Us and them: Mood effects on intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 28-40.
27.
Gaertner, S. L. , Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-26). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
28.
Gaertner, L. , & Insko, C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the Minimal Group Paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77-94.
29.
Gaertner, L. , Sedikides, C., & Graetz, K. (1999). In search of self-definition: Motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 5-18.
30.
Gaertner, L. , & Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 963-980.
31.
Galinsky, A. D. , & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group-favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724.
32.
Grieve, P. G. , & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 926-940.
33.
Hinkle, S. , & Brown, R. J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory. Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70) London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
34.
Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 223-255). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
35.
Hogg, M. A. , & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identification: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
36.
Hogg, M. A. , & Abrams, D. (1993). Towards a single-process uncertainty reduction model of social motivation in groups. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation. Social psychology perspectives. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
37.
Hogg, M. A. , & Mullin, B. A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In D. A. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249-279). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
38.
Judd, C. , Park, B., Ryan, C. S., Brauer, M., & Kraus, S. (1995). Stereotypes and ethnocentrism: Diverging interethnic perceptions of African American and White American youth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 460-481.
39.
Kashima, E. S. , Kashima, Y., & Hardie, E. A. (2000). Self-typicality and group identification: Evidence for their separateness. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 97-110.
40.
Kofta, M. , & Sedek, G. (1989). Repeated failure: A source of helplessness or a factor irrelevant to its emergence?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 3-12.
41.
Krueger, J. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 163-239). New York: Academic Press.
42.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). A motivated gatekeeper of our minds. Need for closure effects on interpersonal and intergroup processes. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Vol. 3. The interpersonal context. New York: Guilford.
43.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
44.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Mayseless, O. (1987). Motivational effects in the social comparison of opinions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 834-853.
45.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Mayseless, O. (1988). Contextual effects in hypothesis testing: The role of competing alternatives and epistemic motivations. Social Cognition, 6, 1-20.
46.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: ‘Seizing’ and ‘freezing’. Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
47.
Maass, A. , & Schaller, M. (1991). Intergroup biases and the cognitive dynamics of stereotype formation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 189-209). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
48.
Mackie, D. , & Smith, E. R. (1998). Intergroup relations: Insights from a theoretical integrative approach. Psychological Review, 105, 499-529.
49.
Messick, D. M. , & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
50.
Mikulincer, M. , Yinon, A., & Kabili, D. (1991). Epistemic needs and learned helplessness. European Journal of Personality, 5, 249-258.
51.
Mummendey, A. (1995). Positive distinctiveness and intergroup discrimination: An old couple living in divorce. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 657-670.
52.
Mummendey, A. , & Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 107-143). New York: Wiley.
53.
Mummendey, A. , & Otten, S. (2001). Aversive discrimination. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology: Volume 4. Intergroup relations (pp. 112-132). Oxford: Blackwell.
54.
Oakes, P. (2001). The root of all evil in intergroup relations? Unearthing the categorization process. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 3-21). Oxford: Blackwell.
55.
Otten, S. (2002). Why are we so positive? Another look at ingroup favoritism in minimal intergroup settings. Submitted for publication.
56.
Otten, S. , & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a Minimal Group Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 77-89.
57.
Otten, S. , & Mummendey, A. (in press). Social discrimination and aggression: A matter of perspective-specific divergence? In W. Kallmeyer & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Perspectivity and perspectivation in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58.
Otten, S. , Mummendey, A., & Buhl, T. (1998). Accuracy in information processing and the positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 11, 69-96.
59.
Otten, S. , & Wentura, D. (1999). About the impact of automaticity in the Minimal Group Paradigm: Evidence from affective priming tasks. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1049-1071.
60.
Otten, S. , & Wentura, D. (2001). Self-anchoring and ingroup favoritism: An individual-profiles analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 525-532.
61.
Perdue, C. W. , Dovidio, J. F., Gurtman M. B., & Tyler, R. B. (1990). Us and them: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 475-486.
62.
Perreault, S. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 92-103.
63.
Rabbie, J. M. , & Horwitz, M. (1969). The arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 223-228.
64.
Rabbie, J. M. , Schot, J. C., & Visser, L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171-202.
65.
Schubert, T. , & Otten, S. (in press). Overlap of self, ingroup and outgroup: Pictorial measurement of self categorization. Self and Identity.
66.
Sedek, G. , & Kofta, M. (1990). When cognitive exertion does not yield cognitive gain: Toward an informational explanation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 729-743.
67.
Shah, J. Y. , Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1998). Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 383-393.
68.
Skowronski, J. J. , & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689-699.
69.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
70.
Tajfel, H. , Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
71.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
72.
Taylor, S. E. , & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
73.
Tropp, L. R. , & Wright, S. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585-600.
74.
Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
75.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
76.
Turner, J. C. , & Reynolds, K. J. (2001). The social identity perspective in intergroup relations: Theories, themes, and controversies. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 133-152). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
77.
VanLehn, K. (1989). Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 527-557). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78.
Webster, D. M. , & Kruglanski, A. W. (1998). Cognitive and social consequences of the need for cognitive closure. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 8). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
79.
Wenzel, M. (2000). Justice and identity: The significance of inclusion for perceptions of entitlement and justice motive. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 157-176.
