Status and power covary such that higher status groups are typically higher power groups. This research explored the effect of status on intergroup perception controlling for power. Experiment 1 manipulated the relative status of social groups and explicitly provided the groups equal power. Experiment 2 manipulated status and power orthogonally. Multiple measures yielded consistent patterns indicating that status affected perceived group centrality and variability independent of power. The patterns were consistent with a strategic intergroup comparison account as suggested by social identity theory. Specifically, the effect of status on intergroup perception varied with the relevance and valence of the dimension of comparison in a manner that balanced social reality with a positive social identity.
Bardach, L. , & Park, B. (1996). The effect of in-group and out-group status on memory for consistent and inconsistent behavior of an individual . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 169–178 .
2.
Barth, E. A. , & Noel, D. L. (1972). Conceptual frameworks for the analysis of race relations: An evaluation . Social Forces, 50, 333–348 .
3.
Baumeister, R. F. , Bratslavsky, E. , Finkenauer, C. , & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good . Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370 .
4.
Bettencourt, B. A. , Dorr, N. , Charlton, K. , & Hume, D.L. (2001). Status differences and ingroup bias: A meta-analytic examinations of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability . Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520–542 .
5.
Boldry, J. G. , & Kashy, D. A. (1999). Intergroup perception in naturally occurring groups of differential status: A social relations perspective . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1200–1212 .
6.
Brauer, M. (2001). Intergroup perception in the social context: The effects of social status and group membership on perceived out-group homogeneity and ethnocentrism . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 15–31 .
7.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive–motivational analysis . Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–334 .
8.
Brown, R. , & Wootten-Millward, L. (1993). Perceptions of group homogeneity during group formation and change . Social Cognition, 11, 126–149 .
9.
Cabecinhas, R. , & Amancio, L. (1999). Asymmetries in the perception of others as a function of social position and context . Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 40–50 .
10.
Carli, L. L , & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work(pp. 203–222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
11.
Christensen, P. N. , Boldry, J. G. , & Kashy, D. A. (2004). Group-based self-evaluation outside the laboratory: Effects of global versus contextual status . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 985–994 .
12.
Doosje, B. , Haslam, S. A. , Spears, R. , Oakes, P. J. , & Koomen , (1998). The effect of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgments and the evaluation of group characteristics . European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 173–184 .
13.
Doojse, B. , Spears, R. , & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn't all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642–655 .
14.
Ellemers, N. , Van Knippenberg, A. , De Vries, N. , & Wilke, H. (1988). Social identification and permeability of group boundaries . European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 497–413 .
15.
Ellemers, N. , Van Knippenberg, A. , & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change . British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233–246 .
16.
Ellemers, N. , & Van Rijswijk, W. (1997). Identity needs versus social opportunities: The use of group-level and individual-level identity management strategies . Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 52–65 .
17.
Ellemers, N. , Van Rijswijk, W. , Roefs, M. , & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186–198 .
18.
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping . American Psychologist, 48, 621–628 .
19.
Fiske, S. T. , & Depret, E. (1996). Control, interdependence, and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 31–61). Chichester, UK: Wiley .
20.
Guinote, A. , Judd, C. M. , & Brauer, M. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 708–721 .
21.
Hall, J. (1971, November). Decisions, decisions, decisions . Psychology Today, 51–54 and 86–88 .
22.
Hewstone, M. , Rubin, M. , & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias . Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604 .
23.
Ito, T. A. , Larsen, J. T. , Smith, N. K. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887–900 .
24.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk . Econometrica, 47, 263–291 .
25.
Kelley, H. H. , & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley Interscience .
26.
Linville, P. W. , Fischer, G. W. , & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165–188 .
27.
Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). They all look alike and so do we... sometimes: Perceptions of in-group and out-group homogeneity as a function of sex and context . British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 111–124 .
28.
Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1998). Group status and perceptions of homogeneity. In Stroebe, W. and Hewstone, M. (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 31–75. New York: John Wiley and Sons .
29.
Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. , Deaux, K. , & Dafflon, A. (1998). Group homogeneity as a function of relative social status . Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 255–273 .
30.
Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. , Eagly, A. H. , & Stewart, T. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193–217 .
31.
Mullen, B. , Brown, R. , & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration . European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122 .
32.
Neuberg, S. L. , & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy driven attention, and individuating processes . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431–444 .
33.
Park, B. , & Judd, C. M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173–191 .
34.
Park, B. , & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051–1068 .
35.
Quattrone, G. A. , & Jones, E. E. (1980). The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implications for the law of small numbers . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology38, 141–152 .
36.
Rubin, M. , Hewstone, M. , & Voci, A. (2001). Stretching the boundaries: Strategic perceptions of intragroup variability . European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 413–429 .
37.
Sachdev, I. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations . European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1–24 .
38.
Sedikides, C. (1997). Differential processing of ingroup and outgroup information: The role of relative group status in permeable boundary groups . European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 121–144 .
39.
Sidanius, J. , & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
40.
Simon, B. (1992). Intragroup differentiation in terms of ingroup and outgroup attributes . European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 407–413 .
41.
Tajfel, H. , Billig, M. , Bundy, R. P. , & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour . European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178 .
42.
Tajfel H. , & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel , & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole .
