People tend to perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup stereotypical traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup stereotypical traits (e.g., Kelly, 1989; Simon, 1992a; Simon & Pettigrew, 1990). If it is assumed that people use homogeneity ratings to indicate the extent to which groups possess traits, then this stereotype effect may be interpreted as an expression of perceived trait possession (i.e., ingroups possess ingroup stereotypical traits and outgroups possess outgroup stereotypical traits). If it is further assumed that research participants abide by the conversational norm of appropriate quantity (e.g., Bless, Strack, & Schwarz, 1993), then this stereotype effect should be significantly reduced following prior expressions of perceived trait possession. A literature review and two minimal group experiments (Ns = 75, 104) supported this prediction. This evidence is discussed in relation to the outgroup homogeneity effect and self-categorization theory.
Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likeableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,9, 272-279.
2.
Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,42, 228-235.
3.
Bless, H., Strack, F., & Schwarz, N. (1993). The informative functions of research procedures: Bias and the logic of conversation. European Journal of Social Psychology,23, 149-165.
4.
Bochner, S., & Van Zyl, T. (1985). Desirability ratings of 110 personality trait words. Journal of Social Psychology,125, 459-465.
5.
Boldry, J. G., & Kashy, D. A. (1999). Intergroup perception in naturally occurring groups of differential status: A social relations perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,77, 1200-1212.
6.
Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and ingroup homogeneity. Social Cognition,11, 150-164.
7.
Brown, J., Collins, R. L., & Schmidt, G. W. (1988). Self-esteem and direct vs. indirect forms of self enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,55, 445-453.
8.
Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology,59, 273-286.
9.
Brown, R., & Wootton-Millward, L. (1993). Perceptions of group homogeneity during group formation and change. Social Cognition,11, 126-149.
10.
Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science,3, 14-25.
11.
Castano, E., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1998). The highs and lows of group homogeneity. Behavioural Processes,42, 219-238.
12.
Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1-40). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13.
De Cremer, D. (2001). Perceptions of group homogeneity as a function of social comparison: The mediating role of group identity. Current Psychology: Developmental,Learning,Personality, Social,20, 138-146.
14.
Devos, T., Comby, L., & Deschamps, J. (1996). Asymmetries in judgements of ingroup and outgroup variability. European Review of Social Psychology,7, 95-144.
15.
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1999). Commitment and intergroup behavior. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context,commitment,content (pp. 84-106). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16.
Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn't all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereo-typing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,69, 642-655.
17.
Ford, T. E., & Stangor, C. (1992). The role of diagnosticity in stereo-type formation: Perceiving group means and variances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,63, 356-367.
18.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Volume 3, Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Guinote, A., Judd, C. M., & Brauer, M. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,82, 708-721.
20.
Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behaviour (pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Hampson, S. E., Goldberg, L. R., & John, O. P. (1987). Category-breadth and social-desirability values for 573 personality terms. European Journal of Personality,1, 241-258.
22.
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology,39, 113-127.
23.
Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (1999). Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,25, 809-818.
24.
Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & McGarty, C. (1995). Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favourableness. British Journal of Social Psychology,34, 139-160.
25.
Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & McGarty, C. (1996). Social identity, self-categorization, and the perceived homogeneity of ingroups and outgroups: The interaction between social motivation and cognition. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 182-222). New York: Guilford.
26.
Hewstone, M., Islam, M. R., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Models of crossed categorization and intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,64, 779-793.
27.
Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin,118, 248-271.
28.
Hopkins, N., & Cable, I. (2001). Group variability judgments: Investigating the context-dependence of stereotypicality and dispersal judgments. British Journal of Social Psychology,40, 455-470.
29.
Jones, E. E., Wood, G. C., & Quattrone, G. A. (1981). Perceived variability of personal characteristics in ingroups and outgroups: The role of knowledge and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,7, 523-528.
30.
Judd, C. M., Park, B., Ryan, C. S., Brauer, M., & Kraus, S. (1995). Stereotypes and ethnocentrism: Diverging interethnic perceptions of African American and White American youth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 460-481.
31.
Kelly, C. A. (1989). Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneity. British Journal of Social Psychology,28, 239-250.
32.
Lambert, A. J. (1995). Stereotypes and social judgment: The consequences of group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,68, 388-403.
33.
Lambert, A. J., & Wyer, R. S. (1990). Stereotypes and social judgment: The effects of typicality and group heterogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,59, 676-691.
34.
Lee, Y. T., & Ottati, V. (1995). Perceived ingroup homogeneity as a function of group membership salience and stereotype threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,21, 610-619.
35.
Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,74, 1421-1436.
36.
Linville, P. W. (1998). The heterogeneity of homogeneity. In J. M. Darley & J. Cooper (Eds.), Attribution and social interaction: The legacy of Edward E.Jones (pp. 423-487). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37.
Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of characteristics of ingroup and outgroup members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57, 165-188.
38.
Linville, P. W., Salovey, P., & Fischer, G. W. (1986). Stereotyping and perceived distributions of social characteristics: An application to ingroup–outgroup perception. In J. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice,discrimination,and racism (pp. 165-208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39.
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,18, 302-318.
40.
Mullen, B., & Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,10, 233-252.
41.
Ostrom, T. M., & Sedikides, C. (1992). Outgroup homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin,112, 536-552.
42.
Park, B., & Hastie, R. (1987). Perception of variability in category development: Instance versus abstraction-based stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,53, 621-635.
43.
Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173-191.
44.
Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of outgroup homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of ingroup and outgroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,42, 1051-1068.
45.
Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Assimilation and differentiation needs as motivational determinants of perceived ingroup and outgroup homogeneity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 341-348.
46.
Plaks, J. E., Levy, S. R., Dweck, C. S., & Stroessner, S. J. (2004). In the eye of the beholder: Lay theories and the perception of group entitativity, variability, and essence. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability,entitativity,and essentialism(pp. 127-146). New York: Psychology Press.
47.
Rothgerber, H. (1997). External threat as an antecedent to perceptions of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,73, 1206-1212.
48.
Rubin, M., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. (2001). Stretching the boundaries: Strategic perceptions of intragroup variability. European Journal of Social Psychology,31, 413-429.
49.
Rubin, M., Hewstone, M., Crisp, R. J., Voci, A., & Richards, Z. (2004). Gender outgroup homogeneity: The roles of differential familiarity, gender differences, and group size. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability,entitativity,and essentialism(pp. 203-220). New York: Psychology Press.
50.
Ryan, C. S., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1996). Effects of racial stereotypes on judgments of individuals: The moderating role of perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,32, 71-103.
51.
Ryan, C. S., Robinson, D. R., & Hausmann, L. R. (2001). Stereotyping among providers and consumers of public mental health services: The role of perceived group variability. Behavior Modification,25, 406-442.
52.
Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases,research methods,and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist,54, 93-105.
54.
Simon, B. (1992a). Intragroup differentiation in terms of ingroup and outgroup attributes. European Journal of Social Psychology,22, 407-413.
55.
Simon, B. (1992b). The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: Reintroducing the intergroup context. European Review of Social Psychology,3, 1-30.
56.
Simon, B., & Brown, R. (1987). Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,53, 703-711.
57.
Simon, B., Glässner-Bayerl, B., & Stratenwerth, I. (1991). Stereotyping and self-stereotyping in a natural intergroup context: The case of heterosexual men and homosexual men. Social Psychology Quarterly,54, 252-266.
58.
Simon, B., & Hamilton, D. L. (1994). Self-stereotyping and social context: The effects of relative ingroup size and ingroup status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,66, 699-711.
59.
Simon, B., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1990). Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the ingroup homogeneity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology,20, 269-286.
60.
Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Schwarz, N. (1988). Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology,18, 429-442.
61.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology,1, 149-178.
62.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
63.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
64.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review,84, 327-352.
65.
Voci, A. (2000). Perceived group variability and the salience of personal and social identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 177-221.
66.
Yzerbyt, V., Corneille, O., & Estrada, C. (2001). The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereo-types. Personality and Social Psychology Review,5, 141-155.
