This article examines the prevalence of bullying on a group (school-class) level, the impact of data sources (self vs. other nominations) on victim identification, and the relation between bullying and rejection by peers in two samples from different types of schools (n = 930). I found that each school class typically contained one or two victims, who were best identified by peer reports, which proved to be highly consensual and distinct, and correlated closely with teacher reports. The simultaneous use of peer and self-reports allowed me to identify `defensive' as well as `sensitive' victims, i. e. individuals who were nominated via one data source only. Finally, a positive correlation between rejection and bullying was found, reflecting the fact that almost all bullied students were simultaneously rejected. In contrast, not all rejected students were victimized. That is, two subgroups of rejected individuals were identified: `Victimized-Rejected' and `Nonvictimized-Rejected'. The findings are discussed with respect to the possibility of generalizing insights from the sociometric literature to the phenomenon of bullying.
Asher, S. R. (1990). Recent advances in the study of peer rejection. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 3-14). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Asher, S. R. , & Coie, J. D. (Eds.) (1990). Peer rejection in childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Boivin, M. , & Hymel, S. (1997). Peer experiences and social self-perception: A sequential model. Developmental Psychology, 33, 135-145.
4.
Boulton, M. J. , & Smith, P. K. (1994). Bully/victim problems in middle school children: Stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315-329.
5.
Boulton, M. J. , & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73-87.
6.
Coie, J. D. , Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570.
7.
Denham, S. A. , & Holt, R. W. (1993). Preschoolers' likability as cause or consequence of their social behavior. Developmental Psychology, 29, 271-275.
8.
Einarsen, S. , Raknes, B. I., & Matthiesen, S. B. (1994). Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study. European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 4, 381-401.
9.
Fabianic, D. (1994). Managerial change and organizational effectiveness in major league baseball: Findings for the eighties. Journal of Sport Behavior, 17, 135-147.
10.
Graham, S. , & Juvonen, J. (1998). A social cognitive perspective on peer aggression and victimization. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development. (pp. 23-70). London: Jessica Kingsley.
11.
Gronlund, N. E. (1959). Sociometry in the classroom. New York: Harper & Brothers.
12.
Hays, W. L. (1981). Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
13.
Hoover, J. H. , Oliver, R., & Hazler, R. J. (1992). Bullying: Perceptions of adolescent victims in the midwestern USA. School Psychology International, 13, 5-16.
14.
Hymel, S. (1986). Interpretations of peer behavior: Affective bias in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 57, 431-445.
15.
Ireland, J. , & Archer, J. (1996). Descriptive analysis of bullying in male and female adult prisoners. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 35-47.
16.
Juvonen, J. (1991). Deviance, perceived responsibility, and negative peer reactions. Developmental Psychology, 27, 672-681.
17.
Kochendorfer, B. J. , & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Peer victimization: Cause or consequence of school maladjustment?Child Development, 67, 1305-1317.
18.
Leymann, H. (1993). Mobbing: Psychoterror am Arbeitsplatz und wie man sie dagegen wehren kann. Reinbeck: Rowohlt.
19.
Lyndon, P. (1994). The leader and the scapegoat: A dependency group study. Group Analysis, 27, 95-104.
20.
Malloy, T. E. , Yarlay, A., Montvilo, R. K., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). Agreement and accuracy in children's interpersonal perceptions: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 692-702.
21.
Mize, J. & Ladd, G. W. (1990). Toward the development of successful social skills training for preschool children. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Mohr, A. , & Becker, P. (1997). Strategien von Schülerinnen und Schfilern im Umgang mit Gewalt in der Schule. Empirische Pädagogik, 11, 351-368.
23.
Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who shall survive? A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease.
24.
Moreno, J. L. (1954). Die Grundlagen der Soziometrie. Köln: Westdeutscher Verlag.
25.
Moreno, J. L. (1987). Psychodrama und Soziometrie. (J. Fox, Ed.) Köln: Edition Humanistische Psychologie.
26.
Newcomb, A. F. , & Bukowski, W. M. (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children's peer group status. Developmental Psychology, 19, 856-867.
27.
Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
28.
Olweus, D. (1989). The Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Bergen, Norway: Mimeo.
29.
Olweus, D. (1992). Victimization among schoolchildren: Intervention and prevention. In G. W. Albee, L. A. Bond, & T. V. Cook Monsey (Eds.), Improving children's lives: Global perspectives on prevention (pp. 279-295). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
O'Moore, A. M. , & Hillery, B. (1989). Bullying in Dublin schools. Irish Journal of Psychology, 10, 426-441.
32.
Perry, D. G. , Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807-814.
33.
Pikas, A. (1989). A pure concept of mobbing gives the best results for treatment. School Psychology International, 10, 95-104.
34.
Putallaz, M. (1983). Predicting children's sociometric status from their behavior. Child Development, 54, 1417-1426.
35.
Putallaz, M. , & Gottman, J. M. (1981). An interactional model of children's entry into peer groups. Child Development, 52, 986-994.
36.
Salmivalli, C. , Lagerspetz, K., Björkvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.
37.
Schuster, B. (1996a). Rejection, exclusion, and harassment at work and in schools: An integration of results from research on mobbing, bullying, and peer rejection. European Psychologist, 1, 293-317.
38.
Schuster, B. (1996b). Mobbing, bullying, and peer rejection. Psychological Science Agenda, 9, 12-13.
39.
Schuster, B. (1998a). Gibt es eine Zunahme von Bullying in der Schule? Konzeptuelle und methodische Überlegungen. In M. Schäfer & D. Frey (Eds.), Aggression und Gewalt unter Kindern und Jugendlichen (pp. 91-104). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
40.
Schuster, B. (1998b). A play on perspectives in studying social status and bullying: How children view others, perceive the own person, and suspect to be seen. Manuscript submitted for publication.
41.
Schuster, B. (in press). Zu brav oder zu böse? Strategien von und gegenüber Abgelehnten und Mobbing-Opfern im Prisoner's Dilemma Paradigma. Zeitschnift für Sozialpsychologie issue 2, 1999.
42.
Whitney, I. , & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3-25.
43.
Williams, K. D. (1997). Social ostracism. In R. M. Kowalski (Ed.), Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 133-170). New York: Plenum.
