Abstract
Background
Alzheimer's disease (AD) presents a significant challenge in healthcare, prompting exploration into non-pharmacological interventions to complement traditional treatments.
Objective
This systematic review explores the efficacy of lifestyle-based interventions in managing AD.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus between 2018 and 2023, selecting randomized controlled trials examining factors such as exercise, diet, stress, and cognitive training in AD patients.
Results
The review revealed physical exercise as the predominant non-pharmacological intervention, accompanied by dietary modifications, cognitive training, and therapies such as mindfulness and music. While exercise demonstrated improvements in quality of life, its cognitive benefits were limited. Modified diets, such as Atkins and ketogenic, displayed inconsistent effects on cognitive function but influenced other health-related parameters. Additionally, probiotic therapy and novel cognitive training technologies were explored.
Conclusions
Despite some interventions showing promise in enhancing cognitive function and slowing disease progression, uncertainties remain regarding the dose-response relationship, underlying mechanisms, and potential synergistic effects. Moreover, consideration of genetic and sex-based disparities is warranted. This synthesis underscores the need for further research to elucidate the nuances of non-pharmacological interventions in managing AD effectively.
PROSPERO registration number
CRD42023432823
Introduction
The progressive growth and aging of the population are expected to lead to a continued increase in Alzheimer's disease (AD) cases. AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that causes neuronal damage and cognitive impairment, leading to memory loss and language problems. As the disease advances, it affects basic bodily functions such as walking and swallowing, significantly reducing the quality of life. AD typically affects adults over 65, individuals with a first-degree relative diagnosed with AD. 1 Risk factors include age, sex, genetics, and lifestyle factors such as physical inactivity, poor diet, chronic diseases, and pollution. 2
Current treatments are limited, with cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists offering minimal symptom relief. Consequently, research is exploring alternative treatments, including non-pharmacological therapies targeting modifiable risk factors. Studies suggest that physical exercise can prevent and delay neurodegenerative diseases and enhance cognitive function in AD patients.3,4 Diets such as the Mediterranean diet can also play a crucial role in preventing AD, 5 and various nutrients and nutraceuticals, such as vitamins, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and antioxidants, show benefits in AD. 6 Other therapies include memory training, ginkgo biloba, acupuncture, yoga, and music.7,8
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for establishing the efficacy of interventions. Given the rising prevalence of AD and the gaps in understanding its modulatory factors, further research is essential to identify effective interventions. This study aims to systematically review non-pharmacological treatments, particularly lifestyle-related RCTs, as adjunctive therapies for AD. Given the rising prevalence of neurodegenerative disorders, particularly AD, and the ongoing gaps in understanding the disease's modulatory factors, further research is imperative to identify interventions capable of significantly mitigating its symptoms and progression.
Methods
Our systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist recommendations. 9 The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database in June 2023 (registration number CRD42023432823).
Search strategy
In October 2023, we conducted a thorough literature search in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to identify relevant articles published in English and Spanish within the last 5 years (2018–2023). The revision focuses on the last five years to provide a more up-to-date and practical perspective, evaluating the latest and most effective lifestyle strategies for managing and preventing AD. Grey literature was not included in this review due to its lack of peer review and standardized methods. We did not select ClinicalTrials.gov because the quality and completeness of the data reported in the database may lack the detailed methodological descriptions necessary for inclusion in a systematic review. Additionally, the information on ClinicalTrials.gov has not undergone peer review and often includes preliminary or interim results. The search utilized keywords connected by Boolean connectors and focused on lifestyle interventions for managing AD, meaning AD syndrome with or without supporting biomarker evidence, including physical exercise, diet, medical foods, stress control therapies, sleep improvement strategies, gaming, and new technologies that can be implemented in a patient's daily life without the need for professional support (Supplemental Material). If a study included a group of patients with mild cognitive impairment in addition to the AD group, the results of the comparison between the two patient groups were included in the tables. The review process was conducted using Covidence systematic review software (Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia) available at http://www.covidence.org (2023–2024). Initially, articles (titles and abstracts) were screened by two independent reviewers based on the eligibility criteria. In cases of disagreement regarding article inclusion, a third researcher reviewed the article's eligibility for inclusion or exclusion.
Eligibility/exclusion criteria: participants, interventions, outcomes, study design
The research question for this systematic review was ‘What strategies related to lifestyle factors, including exercise, diet, stress management, and cognitive training can be useful in managing symptoms of AD? In pursuit of that question, inclusion criteria were established based on the PICOS criteria 10 (Table 1).
PICOS table for studies inclusion.
Only articles written in English and Spanish were considered for inclusion in the review. We excluded in vitro studies, research conducted on animal models, studies centered on caregivers, pharmacological treatments, studies assessing the feasibility of an intervention, meta-analyses, reviews, or interventions requiring the assistance of technical staff. For synthesis, studies were grouped into the following categories: ‘exercise interventions’, ‘supplements and diets’, ‘cognitive training’ and ‘other related lifestyle interventions’.
Data extraction
Data extraction was independently conducted by two reviewers, encompassing various aspects of the included studies. Details regarding baseline population characteristics, intervention specifics, study variables, measurement methods employed, and primary outcomes were extracted. Additionally, study characteristics such as study design, RCT type, and blinding method were also documented. To ensure the precision of the extracted data, a third reviewer meticulously reviewed the information for any potential errors or inconsistencies. The following information was collected for all studies: study objective, patient characteristics including AD severity, mean age, and percentage of male subjects, number of study groups and sample size for each group, intervention details including frequency of administration, intervention duration, and key results. If the information required was not specified in the text, attempts were made to contact the authors of the manuscript to obtain it; when no response was received, this lack of information is presented as ‘not specified’ in this manuscript.
Risk of bias assessment
The potential for bias was assessed using an expanded version of the Jadad scale employed previously in systematic reviews of AD drug trials. 11 This scale evaluates aspects of internal validity, including the quality of randomization, double-blinding, participant withdrawals, description of inclusion and exclusion criteria, methods for assessing adverse effects, and the statistical analysis employed. Each item answered ‘yes’ earns one point, while each ‘no’ response receives zero points. Additionally, one point is deducted if the randomization method or double blinding is deemed inappropriate. Given the challenge of blinding dietary interventions, studies employing single blinding were assigned half a point, as previously described. 12 The total score for each article was calculated by summing the score of each item, ranging from 0 to 8. Studies scoring 0 to 3 were classified as low-quality, while those scoring 4 to 8 were categorized as high-quality. 12
Results
Study inclusion
The search strategy yielded a total of 20,506 references, with 20,500 retrieved from Web of Science (7522), Scopus (6997), and PubMed (5987) (Figure 1). Of these references, 11,558 were removed due to duplicates, and 8942 underwent title and abstract screening by two independent reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. A total of 278 studies underwent full-text review, and 198 were subsequently excluded. The primary reasons for exclusion included not being an interventional study (n = 70), inappropriate study population (n = 43), non-compliance with the experimental design of an RCT (n = 36), intervention not related to lifestyle factors (n = 30), type of article (protocol paper, conference paper, corrigendum, etc.) (n = 15), non-English language (n = 3), and one article has been excluded due to retraction during the reviewing process. Ultimately, 80 studies were included in the review (Figure 1).

PRISMA flow diagram.
Characteristics of the included trials
The summarized characteristics and objectives of all selected studies in the systematic review are presented in Tables 2-5. Among the various lifestyle interventions for AD patients (Figure 2), physical exercise has been the subject of the highest number of RCTs (n = 40) (Table 2), followed by dietary interventions, including complete diets or nutritional compounds (n = 24) (Table 3). Additionally, three studies investigated the combined effects of physical exercise and cognitive training,23,30,33 one study investigated the combination of exercise and visual stimulation, 35 photobiomodulation, 32 and a third explored the combination with shiatsu, applying pressure to specific areas of the body, also known as acupressure 27 (Table 2). No studies were found that addressed the combined treatment of exercise and dietary intervention. Cognitive training utilizing new technologies such as computer-based programs or virtual reality was also identified during this review77–84 (Table 4). Furthermore, the category of ‘Other types of interventions’ encompassed less-explored approaches, including mindfulness,86,92 music therapy, 87 or shiatsu techniques, 27 grounding, 90 oral health, 85 companion animals, 93 light-based intervention 88 and electrical massage 89 (Table 5).

Lifestyle interventions in Alzheimer's disease.
Exercise-related studies.
AD: Alzheimer's disease; Aβ: amyloid-β; BDNF: brain derived neurotrophic factor; CEG: combined exercise group; CG: control group; EG: exercise group; GPR: global postural reeducation; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HG, healthy group; IFNγ: interferon gamma; IL, interleukin; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MCI: mild cognitive impairment; n.s.: not specified; NfL; neurofilament light chain; p-tau: phosphorylated tau; PE, physical exercise; sTREM2, soluble trigger receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2; t-tau: total tau; TG: treatment group; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; W: week; WM: working memory.
Nutritional intervention studies.
ACh: acetylcholine; AChE: acetylcholinesterase; AChEI: acetylcholinesterase inhibitor; AD: Alzheimer's disease; Aβ: amyloid-β; AβPP: amyloid-β protein precursor; BACE1: β-secretase 1; BDNF: brain derived neurotrophic factor; BuChE: butyrylcholinesterase; CG: control group; CRP: c-reactive protein; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid; EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; FA: fatty acids; GSH: glutathione; HbA1C: hemoglobin A1c; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; HNE, 4-hydroxynonenal; HOMA-IR: Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; hs-CRP: high sensitivity c-reactive protein; IL: interleukin; JYF: Jiannao Yizhi formula; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; LysoPC: 1-Lysophosphatidylcholine; MDA, malondialdehyde; n.s.: not specified; NAD+: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NfL; neurofilament light chain; NO, nitric oxide; p-tau: phosphorylated tau; QUICKI: quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index; SAG: S-acetyl glutathione; SAH: S-adenosylhomocysteine; SAM: S-adenosyl-L-methionine; sIL1RII: soluble IL-1 receptor type II; t-tau: total tau; TAC, total antioxidant capacity; TG: treatment group; tHcy: total homocysteine; TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor alpha; w: week; YKL-40: chitinase-3-like protein 1.
Studies related to cognitive training.
AD: Alzheimer's disease; CG: control group; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; n.s.: not specified; TG: treatment group; w: week.
Other related with other lifestyle interventions studies.
AD: Alzheimer's disease; CG: control group; EAM: electrical automatic massage; MCI: mild cognitive impairment; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; n.s.: not specified; TG: treatment group; w: week.
Exercise interventions
Exercise emerges as the most frequently utilized intervention for AD patients, comprising a total of 40 RCTs out of 81 studies (Table 2). More than 50% of the studies used moderate- to high-intensity aerobic exercise, while the rest focused on low-intensity exercise or postural reeducation/stretching exercise. These aerobic exercise programs typically involved activities such as cycling, treadmill walking, and aerobic exercises. Aerobic exercise has been shown to have various benefits for individuals with AD, including improvements in mobility, functional activities and reducing the risk of falls,29,33–35,37,38,40,46 which may indicate a positive impact on neurodegenerative processes. The effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive function are less evident, as certain studies report enhancements in cognitive functions13,28,29,40 while others did not detect any discernible effect.26,48 Most studies employing aerobic exercise to investigate its effects on inflammation markers or disease development fail to demonstrate significant results. No effects of exercise were detected on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, 19 cortical thickness, 20 cortical amyloid-β (Aβ), 21 serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels, 22 cerebral blood flow, 45 p-tau181, t-tau and Aβ42/40 51 or the inflammatory markers 8-isoprostane, interferon gamma (IFNγ), Interleukin-10 (IL10), IL12p70, IL13, IL1β, IL2, IL4, IL6, IL8, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα). 24 However, in another study the combination of exercise with cognitive training showed an effect on Aβ levels. 30 Other studies employ multimodal exercises, combining aerobic exercise with strength, balance, and stretching components.15,17,18,42,51 Two of these studies find benefits in functioning, strength, and balance,15,17 while the other studies only find benefits when multimodal exercise is applied to individuals with mild cognitive impairment but not in AD patients 18 or did not find effect on plasma biomarkers of AD patients. 51 The other type of studies primarily focus on global postural reeducation showing effects on cognition, psychological symptoms, physical activity, and quality of life,42–44 sport stacking (a sport that involves stacking of specially designed cups), 47 bed exercises 52 and a study on hand exercises to enhance feeding efficiency. 16 Of particular interest are studies in which exercise is combined with another intervention to observe synergistic effects. This is the case with the combination of exercise with working memory training, 26 cognitive training,30,33 photobiomodulation, 32 and visual stimulation. 35 The sample sizes in these exercise-related studies varied. Some studies had smaller sample sizes, such as 10 or less participants in each group,13,27,29,47 while others had larger sample sizes with a participant number close to 100 individuals per group,22,24,26,37,38,42 with a common range falling between 20 to 30 participants in each group. Regarding the duration of the exercise intervention, the shortest exercise intervention used in these studies is 4 weeks, the longest is 96 weeks, and the average is between 12–16 weeks.
Supplements and diets
In a total of 24 studies, the treatment approach focused on dietary intervention (Table 3). Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation emerged as the most commonly utilized treatment in nutritional intervention studies, with intervention periods ranging from 24 to 96 weeks. While this supplementation appears to reduce oxidative stress markers, none of the studies demonstrated cognitive improvement in patients, despite limited sample sizes, as only two studies included more than 50 patients per group.58,59 Vitamins, whether used individually or in combination with other vitamins or compounds, are also among the most utilized supplements. For instance, vitamin D supplementation 59 and folic acid combined with vitamin B12 56 have been demonstrated to improve cognition and related markers, or to enhance the effects of pharmaceuticals. 72
Regarding diets, one study investigates the feasibility of implementing the Atkins diet and its effects on cognitive function, 55 while two studies explore the use of the ketogenic diet or a ketogenic formula.66,67 None of these studies demonstrate a positive effect on cognitive function, although they do show an impact on other parameters related to daily function such as attention and language (Table 3). Additionally, two studies utilize probiotics as a dietary intervention53,54 and one examines co-supplementation of probiotics with selenium yielding varying results on cognition. 69 Two studies report positive outcomes54,69 while the third shows no effect. 53 Notably, all three studies have the same duration and sample size but employ distinct probiotic strains (Table 3), with none of them evaluating the potential alteration in gut microbiota as an outcome.
Cognitive training
Cognitive training emerges as a particularly effective therapeutic approach for enhancing the cognitive functions of AD patients. Moreover, the research covered in this review highlights significant success in utilizing emerging technologies like virtual reality 82 and computer-based activities78,84 for this purpose (Table 4). However, it is important to acknowledge a limitation regarding the relatively small sample sizes used in several of these studies. Out of the 8 studies examined, 5 of them feature sample sizes equal to or less than 10, with only one study having a subject pool exceeding 50 per group. Additionally, the interventions vary in duration, ranging from 8 to 24 weeks.
Other related lifestyle interventions
This section encompasses studies employing highly diverse practices that can be integrated into the patient's lifestyle, including mindfulness, 86 electric massage, 89 grounding, 90 music listening, 91 dog companionship, 93 additional blue light exposure, 88 and oral health 85 (Table 5). Many of these studies involved small populations and short-term interventions, which limits the robustness of the conclusions. However, most studies observed improvements in AD patients across various parameters, such as daily functioning, cognition, and a reduction in neurological symptoms (Table 5).
Risk of bias
To assess the quality of the RCTs included in this systematic review, we utilized the modified Jadad quality scale, previously validated for evaluating the quality of AD drug reports. 11 The risk of bias was rated by two independent researchers (SCV and MT), the interrater agreement kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated obtaining an overall value of 0.94 indicating strong agreement between the two raters. The mean Jadad scale score for all the studies included in this review was 5.58 ± 1.72, indicating that most studies met quality standards. Only 12 out of 80 studies did not achieve a score of 4 on the Jadad scale, while 25 out of 80 obtained a score ≥7 (Supplemental Tables 1–4). Regarding the different interventions considered in this review, dietary interventions received the highest Jadad scale scores (6.52 ± 1.63) (Supplemental Table 2), while other lifestyle-related interventions scored the lowest (5.22 ± 2.24), with physical exercise interventions similarly scoring (5.22 ± 1.59) (Supplemental Table 4). RCTs focusing on cognitive training had a mean Jadad scale score of 5.63 ± 1.75 (Supplemental Table 3).
Discussion
After conducting a thorough analysis of RCTs, our systematic review suggests that lifestyle interventions are associated with moderate improvements in the quality of life for individuals affected by AD. However, overall, these interventions do not lead to significant changes in cognitive function. Among various interventions, evidence from medium-term studies suggests that exercise programs are linked to a modest enhancement in quality of life aspects, such as mobility, balance, and fall incidence, irrespective of the type or intensity of training.15,17,29,37,38,42,44
However, the conclusions drawn from other studies included in our systematic review regarding the exercise effects on cognitive function are inconclusive due to limitations such as a small number of patients in the sample size or the short duration of the intervention, with some interventions lasting as briefly as 4 to 6 weeks. Unraveling the specific contribution of particular types of exercise to AD prevention poses a significant challenge. The significant variability in individual responses to exercise within the population39,48 and the different tools employed in assessing exercise stand as noteworthy concerns. To mitigate these uncertainties, future studies incorporating objective measures of exercise may provide more accurate data and help address the current ambiguities surrounding this topic. The biological mechanisms underlying the impact of exercise on AD patients are diverse, with some yet to be fully elucidated. Exercise has been found to enhance immunity, with certain studies demonstrating improvements in natural killer cell activity.94,95 Additionally, exercise has been shown to improve microcirculation, thereby reducing hypoxic environments, which are significant for AD development. 96
Regarding nutritional interventions, none of the analyzed studies demonstrated any difference in cognitive function or daily parameters in participants who consumed omega-3 fatty acid or fish oil supplementation compared to those who did not.58,62,65,68,70 While omega-3 fatty acids could potentially have a protective effect against AD due to their anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties, 97 there are currently no intervention studies in humans with clear and consistent results. Supplementation with different vitamins (D, B12, folic acid, etc.), as well as various types of plant extracts, appears to improve the cognitive abilities of AD patients,56,59,63,64 possibly by reducing the oxidative stress associated with this disease. However, more studies with large sample sizes and adequate characterization of the extracts are needed to obtain clear results. Much of the previous support for a positive association between healthy diets, such as the Mediterranean diet, and healthier AD patients has come from observational studies. These diets combine numerous components (omega-3, polyphenols, fiber, etc.) with a potential effect on AD and also reflect a healthier lifestyle in those who consume them. There are other hypotheses that could account for the observed results, in addition to the reduction in oxidative stress or neuroinflammation, which have not been investigated in the studies. For example, changes in body composition, such as obesity, are related to the incidence of AD, 98 increasing the production of proinflammatory factors and some hormones that can promote AD, 99 or changes in the intestinal microbiota that can be exerted by diet or exercise.100,101
Furthermore, cognitive training involving daily activities and other lifestyle interventions, such as music, light exposure, or mindfulness, have been identified in this review as potential interventional factors that may enhance cognitive function and reduce overall deterioration. However, it is important to note that these studies have several limitations that should be considered. Most studies included in our review were conducted with a very limited number of patients, and much of the data were collected based on participants’ self-reports, making it difficult to establish the actual intensity or duration of the activities performed. Additionally, the biological mechanisms underlying these parameters have not been thoroughly investigated, with only correlational studies conducted thus far.
Probably multi-component lifestyle interventions are more effective in achieving significant health improvements compared to single-component interventions; however, only a few studies of this review use more than one approach. Our study highlights the lack of high quality randomized controlled trials including different lifestyle intervention to sustain their synergistic effects on AD patients. Just recently, Ornish et al. have demonstrated for the first time through a well-controlled RCT the beneficial effect of an intensive lifestyle changes in AD patients. 102 The synergy from combining multiple lifestyle factors in an intervention could lead to more profound and sustainable health improvements in AD patients.
Another factor that we have to consider is that in most of the studies included in this systematic review, the diagnosis of AD patients was established without the use of biomarkers. The correct diagnosis of AD is crucial for the proper management of the disease and the planning of treatments. In fact, the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) has recently revised and established diagnostic recommendations based on biomarkers for the preclinical, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia stages of AD. 103 The use of biomarkers, such as amyloid biomarkers or pathologic tau biomarkers, can provide objective evidence and help distinguish AD stages and AD from other forms of dementia. However, in current practice, the use of these biomarkers is not widespread due to their high cost, lack of access to advanced technologies, and lack of standardization in diagnostic procedures. This deficiency can lead to incorrect or delayed diagnoses, which in turn can result in inadequate treatments and faster progression of the disease. Furthermore, the lack of accurate diagnosis can hinder the proper inclusion of patients in clinical trials, affecting research and the development of new therapies. Therefore, it is essential to promote the use of biomarkers in clinical practice to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. We have also to consider that a large portion of RCTs revised do not measure biological markers. Biomarkers, such as Aβ and tau proteins provide direct information about the underlying pathological mechanisms of the disease, can be detected in the early stages, allowing for early intervention and more accurate monitoring of disease progression. Furthermore, biological markers can help evaluate the efficacy of treatments in a more objective and quantifiable manner, facilitating the development of more specific and effective therapies. In contrast, other parameters like cognitive and behavioral changes are often more subjective and can be influenced by multiple external factors, limiting their accuracy and usefulness in AD research and treatment.
The control and intervention groups in all studies consist of patients with AD; therefore, the starting conditions of both groups should be similar. However, it is important to note that most of the interventions included in this systematic review do not have a placebo per se. Except for some dietary interventions, such as probiotics or vitamins, where the control groups receive a placebo capsule, dietary interventions, exercise interventions, cognitive training, and other therapies such as music, mindfulness, etc., do not permit the use of ‘placebos’. In exercise interventions, the most common control groups treatment is the ‘continuation with the daily routine’ or ‘usual care’; however, creating a sham group for exercise studies is challenging.104,105 Moreover, physical activity impacts mental health, making it complex to determine the extent to which psychological benefits from physical exercise are attributable to placebo effects. Similarly, other interventions, such as acupuncture or the use of devices, face analogous challenges. 104 For dietary interventions, nutritional advice is often used as the control technique; however, this may not be optimal for such studies. Instead, more rigorously designed control diets would be necessary to implement placebo controls in dietary interventions. 106
To understand the modulatory factors of AD, further research is imperative to identify interventions capable of significantly mitigating its symptoms and progression. Our systematic review suggests that lifestyle interventions are associated with moderate improvements in the quality of life for individuals affected by AD, but do not lead to significant changes in cognitive function. In fact, future studies with long-term follow-ups and consistent intervention measures over time are needed to establish a stronger evidence base for cognitive function improvement in AD patients.
This review has several limitations. Firstly, our search strategy may have missed abstracts that did not clearly specify the various parameters considered in this review. This omission could have influenced the number of studies included in the analysis, as researchers might have chosen not to disclose these results due to their lack of statistical significance. Additionally, the trials included in this review ranged in duration from 4 weeks to 24 weeks, reflecting significant variability in the type of intervention and the outcomes achieved. For certain activities, such as light exposure and mindfulness, we were unable to explore the sources of heterogeneity between studies due to the limited number of studies available. Furthermore, the studies considered in this review were conducted primarily in the US, Australia, Europe, and other high-income countries, limiting the generalizability of the findings, particularly to low- and middle-income countries.
Finally, while the risk of bias is generally low for most of the studies included in this review, there are other factors that are not accounted for in the assessment of bias and should be considered: (1) many studies do not calculate sample sizes, which can affect the statistical power and reliability of the results; (2) dietary factors are often not considered in exercise trials and vice versa, as well as other factors such as body mass index or initial muscle strength; (3) there is considerable variation in the statistical analysis used among studies, particularly regarding covariate analysis.
Future studies in each area should prioritize reproducible research practices, such as protocol registration and adherence to common intervention criteria, to enhance the reliability and comparability of findings across studies.
Conclusions, limitations, and future research
Our review of RCTs suggests that there are numerous lifestyle interventions that could enhance the quality of life for AD patients, addressing both cognitive and executive function levels. However, the number of studies for each intervention type is limited, with variations in duration, dosage, types of exercise, training methods, and devices used. Future studies with long-term follow-ups and consistent intervention measures over time are needed to establish a stronger evidence base for cognitive function improvement in AD patients. Additionally, studies involving larger and more diverse populations, with equal consideration given to gender, are necessary to enhance generalizability and determine the dose-response relationship of interventions for AD symptom improvement. Lastly, further high-quality RCTs exploring simultaneously different lifestyle interventions are required to determine whether synergistic effects between interventions could constitute a comprehensive treatment program for AD patients, ultimately enhancing their quality of life and cognitive function. A limitation of our study is that we only included articles written in English and Spanish, as these are the languages we can clearly understand, and three studies were discarded due to language barriers.
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877241292829 - Supplemental material for A systematic review of lifestyle-based interventions for managing Alzheimer's disease: Insights from randomized controlled trials
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-alz-10.1177_13872877241292829 for A systematic review of lifestyle-based interventions for managing Alzheimer's disease: Insights from randomized controlled trials by Sara Martínez-López, Mariangela Tabone, Sara Clemente-Velasco, Maria del Rocío González-Soltero, María Bailén, Beatriz de Lucas, Carlo Bressa, Diego Domínguez-Balmaseda, Juan Marín-Muñoz, Carmen Antúnez, Beatriz G. Gálvez and Mar Larrosa in Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
Figure 2 was created in BioRender. Pardo M (2024) https://BioRender.com/l71l897.
Author contributions
Mar Larrosa (Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing); Sara Martínez-López (Data curation; Methodology; Writing – original draft); Mariangela Tabone (Methodology; Visualization; Writing – original draft); Sara Clemente-Velasco (Methodology; Visualization; Writing – original draft); Maria del Rocío González-Soltero (Methodology); María Bailén (Methodology); Beatriz de Lucas (Methodology); Carlo Bressa (Methodology); Diego Domínguez-Balmaseda (Methodology); Juan Marín-Muñoz (Supervision); Carmen Antúnez (Supervision); Beatriz G. Gálvez (Conceptualization; Methodology; Supervision; Writing – review & editing).
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation with the PID2021–123700OB-I00 research project.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and/or its supplemental material.
Supplemental material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
