Inpatient management of complicated mTBI with the BIG assessment tool: Review and summary of the evidence

Abstract

Introduction

The management of mild traumatic brain injury has evolved through the years with an emphasis on the safe discharge of patients given current resources. In this article, we discuss key studies published in the past 12 years that have influenced the direction of complicated mild traumatic brain injury (cmTBI) management. We summarize the evidence on the utilization of the Brain Injury Guideline (BIG) algorithm.

Methods

An independent literature search was conducted on the BIG, updated versions of BIG, and the prognostic studies of adult mild traumatic brain injury admissions cited by the BIG articles. Evidence resources included the search engines of PubMed, Medline, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar bibliographic databases of items published between 1 January 2010 and 30 December 2021. The evidence focused on BIG and its modified versions, as a potential risk assessment tool for discharging mTBI patients early.

Results

Studies supporting the BIG algorithm prior to 2019 presented evidence with serious limitations to their findings. These limitations threaten their veracity and fail to support the efficacy or validation of the BIG algorithm's utilization for mTBI patient management.

Conclusion

The lack of rigor in the BIG algorithm studies suggest the research is currently insufficient to support early discharge and research needs to continue on modified versions of the tool before its widespread use.

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury mild brain injury brain injury assessment literature review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cushman

Agarwal

Fabian

, et al. Practice management guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury: the EAST practice management guidelines work group. J Trauma 2001; 51(5): 1016–1026.

Cassidy

Carroll

Paloso

, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 28–60.

Marshall

Bayley

McCullagh

, et al. Updated clinical practice guidelines for concussion/mild traumatic brain injury and persistent symptoms. Brain Injury 2015; 29(6): 688–700.

Joseph

Aziz

Pandit

, et al. Prospective validation of the Brain Injury Guidelines: managing traumatic brain injury without neurosurgical consultation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014; 77(6): 984–988.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance report of traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths—United States, 2014. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2019.

Martin

Carroll

Plummer

, et al. Safety and efficacy of Brain Injury Guidelines at a level III trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018; 84(3): 483–489.

Azim

Jehan

Rhee

, et al. Big for small: validating Brain Injury Guidelines in pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2017; 83(6): 1200–1204.

Chenoweth

Gaona

Faul

, et al. Incidence of delayed intracranial hemorrhage in older patients after blunt head trauma. JAMA Surg 2018; 153(6): 570–575.

Hartwell

Spalding

Fletcher

, et al. You cannot go home: routine concussion evaluation is not enough. Am Surgeon 2015; 81(4): 395–403.

10.

Frisbie

Wasfie

, et al. A retrospective analysis of factors influencing readmission rates of acute traumatic subdural hematoma in the elderly: a cohort study. International J Surg Open 2019; 20: 20–23.

11.

Theadom

Parmar

Jones

, et al. Frequency and impact of recurrent traumatic brain injury in a population-based sample. J Neurotrauma 2015; 32(10): 674–681.

12.

Lecky

Otesile

Marincowitz

, et al. The burden of traumatic brain injury from low-energy falls among patients from 18 countries in the CENTER-TBI registry: a comparative cohort study. PLoS Med 2021; 18(9): e1003761.

13.

Jones

Brown

Bentley

. Traumatic brain injury-missed diagnosis: a case report. MOI Clin Med Case Rep 2016; 4(4): 101–104.

14.

Yamamoto

Levin

Mild

. Moderate and severe: terminology implications for clinical and experimental traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Neurol 2018; 31(6): 672–680.

15.

Foks

van den Brand

Lingsma

, et al. External validation of computed tomography decision rules for Minor head injury: prospective, multicenter cohort study in the Netherlands. BMJ 2018; 362: K3527.

16.

Pandor

Goodacre

Harnan

, et al. Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor heath injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2011; 15(27): 1–20.

17.

Ross

Pang

Raslan

, et al. External retrospective validation of Brain Injury Guidelines criteria and modified guidelines for improved care value in the management of patients with low-risk neurotrauma. J Neurosurgery 2020; 133(6): 1880–1885. DOI: 10.3171/2019.6.JNS19584

18.

Khan

Elseth

Borsius

, et al. Multicenter assessment of the Brain Injury Guidelines and a proposal of guideline modifications. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2020; 5(1): e000483.

19.

Joseph

Obaid

Dultz

, et al. Validating the Brain Injury Guidelines: results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Prospective Multi-Institutional Trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 93(2): 157–165.