Drawing from a representative sample of adults in the USA, this study explored the links between mobile communication and select indicators of social capital, while also accounting for usage patterns regarding the proximity of mobile contact. Overall, the findings show that mobile phone use intersects with proximity in distinctive ways that are related to spending leisure time with others in a face-to-face context and being active in organized groups and clubs. For individuals with primarily local usage patterns, both voice calling and text messaging were positively associated with social leisure activity. For those who primarily used the mobile phone to contact others from a distance, text messaging was positively related to social leisure activity, and for those whose mobile contacts were balanced between local and distant, voice calling was positively associated with active membership in organizations. Interpretation of these findings and directions for future research are offered in the discussion.
Anderson, C.J. ( 1996) ‘Political Action and Social Integration’ , American Politics Quarterly24(1): 105-204.
2.
Besley, J.C. ( 2006) ‘The Role of Entertainment Television and its Interactions with Individual Values in Explaining Political Participation’, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics11(2): 41-62.
3.
Bimber, B. ( 1998) ‘The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism , Community, and Accelerated Pluralism’, Polity31(1): 133-60.
4.
Brehm, J. and W.M. Rahn ( 1997) ‘Individual Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital’, American Journal of Political Science41(3): 999-1023.
5.
Campbell, S.W. ( 2008) ‘Mobile Technology and the Body: Apparatgeist, Fashion, & Function’, in J. Katz (ed.) Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies, pp. 153-64. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
6.
Campbell, S.W. and N. Kwak (forthcoming) ‘Mobile Communication and Civic Life: Linking Patterns of Use to Civic and Political Engagement’, Journal of Communication .
7.
Campbell, S.W. and T.C. Russo ( 2003) ‘The Social Construction of Mobile Telephony: An Application of the Social Influence Model to Perceptions and Uses of Mobile Phones Within Personal Communication Networks’, Communication Monographs70(4): 317-34.
8.
Cappella, J.N., G.H. Lee and B. Southwell ( 1997) ‘The Effects of News and Entertainment on Interpersonal Trust: Political Talk Radio, Newspapers, and Television’, paper presented at the 58th International Communication Association Conference, Montreal, 22-26 May.
9.
Castells, M. ( 2000) The Rise of Network Society, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
Castells, M., M. Fernandez-Ardevol, J. Qiu and A. Sey ( 2007) Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Chesley, N. ( 2005) ‘Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction’, Journal of Marriage and Family67(5): 1237-48.
12.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Cronbach, L.J. ( 1987) ‘Statistical Tests for Moderator Variables: Flaws in Analyses Recently Proposed’, Psychological Bulletin102(3): 414-17.
14.
Daft, R.L. and R.H. Lengel ( 1984) ‘Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design’, in L.L. Cummings and B.M. Staw (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 6, pp. 191-233. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15.
Daft, R.L. and R.H. Lengel ( 1986) ‘Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design’, Management Science32(5): 544-71.
16.
Gergen, K.J. ( 2008) ‘Mobile Communication and the Transformation of the Democratic Process’, in J. Katz (ed.) Handbook of Mobile Communication Studies, pp. 297-310. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Habuchi, I. ( 2005) ‘Accelerating Reflexivity’, in M. Ito, D. Okabe and M. Matsuda (eds) Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life, pp. 165-82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Hampton, K.N. ( 2001) ‘Living the Wired Life in the Wired Suburb: Netville, Glocalization and Civil Society’, doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto.
19.
Hampton, K.N. and B. Wellman ( 2001) ‘Long Distance Community in the Network Society: Contact and Support Beyond Netville’, American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 476-95.
20.
Hampton, K.N. and B. Wellman ( 2002) ‘The Not so Global Village of Netville’, in B. Wellman and C. Haythornthwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 345-71. Oxford: Blackwell.
21.
Ishii, K. ( 2006) ‘Implications of Mobility: The Uses of Personal Communication Media in Everyday Life’, Journal of Communication56(2): 346-65.
22.
Ito, M. and D. Okabe ( 2005) ‘Technosocial Situations: Emergent Structuring of Mobile E-mail Use’, in M. Ito, D. Okabe and M. Matsuda (eds) Personal, Portable, Pedestrian: Mobile Phones in Japanese Life, pp. 257-73. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
Jaccard, J., R. Turrisi and C.K. Wan ( 1990) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
24.
Jennings, M.K. and V. Zeitner ( 2003) ‘Internet Use and Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis’, Public Opinion Quarterly67(3): 311-34.
25.
Johnsen, T.E. ( 2003) ‘The Social Context of the Mobile Phone Use of Norwegian Teens’, in J. Katz (ed.) Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Communication Technology, pp. 161-170. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
26.
Kang, N. and N. Kwak ( 2003) ‘A Multilevel Approach to Civic Participation: Individual Length of Residence, Neighborhood Residential Stability, and Their Interactive Effects with Media Use’, Communication Research30(1): 80-106.
27.
Katz, J.E. ( 2006) Magic in the Air. New Brunswick, NJ : Transaction Publishers.
28.
Katz, J.E. and P. Aspden ( 1997) ‘A Nation of Strangers?’, Communications of the ACM40(12): 81-6.
29.
Katz, J.E. and S. Sugiyama ( 2005) ‘Mobile Phones as Fashion Statements: The Co-creation of Mobile Communication’s Public Meaning’, in R. Ling and P. Pedersen (eds) Mobile Communications: Re-negotiation of the Social Sphere, pp. 63-81. London: Springer .
30.
Katz, J.E. and S. Sugiyama ( 2006) ‘Mobile Phones as Fashion Statements: Evidence from Student Surveys in the US and Japan’, New Media & Society8(2): 321-37.
31.
Kraut, R., S. Kiesler, B. Boneva, J. Cummings, V. Helgeson, and A. Crawford ( 2002) ‘Internet Paradox Revisited’, Journal of Social Issues58(1): 49-74.
32.
Kraut, R., M. Patterson, V. Lundmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukopadhyay and W. Scherlis ( 1998) ‘Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-being?’, American Psychologist53(9): 1017-31.
33.
Kwak, N. ( 1999) ‘Revisiting the Knowledge Gap Hypothesis: Education , Motivation, and Media Use’, Communication Research26(4): 385-413.
34.
Kwak, N., D.V. Shah and R.L. Holbert ( 2004) ‘Connecting, Trusting, and Participating: The Direct and Interactive Effects of Social Associations’, Political Research Quarterly57(4): 643-52.
35.
Ling, R. ( 2004) The Mobile Connection: The Cell Phone’s Impact on Society. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
36.
Ling, R. ( 2008) New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication is Reshaping Social Cohesion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
Ling, R. and S.W. Campbell (eds) (2009) Reconstruction of Space and Time: Mobile Communication Practices. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
38.
Ling, R. and B. Yttri ( 1999) ‘Nobody Sits at Home and Waits for the Telephone to Ting: Micro and Hyper-coordination through the Use of the Mobile Phone’ , report no. 30/99, Kjeller, Norway: Telenor Research and Development.
39.
Ling, R. and B. Yttri ( 2002) ‘Hyper-coordination via Mobile Phones in Norway’ , in J. Katz and M. Aakhus (eds) Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance, pp.139-69. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
40.
Ling, R., B. Yttri, B. Anderson and D. DiDuca ( 2003) ‘Mobile Communication and Social Capital in Europe’ , in K. Nyiri (ed.) Mobile Democracy: Essays on Society, Self, and Politics. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
41.
Lobet-Maris, C. ( 2003) ‘Mobile Phone Tribes: Youth and Social Identity’ , in L. Fortunati, J. Katz and R. Riccini (eds) Mediating the Human Body: Technology, Communication, and Fashion, pp. 87-92. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
McLeod, J.M., K. Daily, Z. Guo, W.P. Eveland Jr, J. Bayer, S. Yang and H. Wang ( 1996) ‘Community Integration, Local Media Use and Democratic Processes’, Communication Research23(2): 179-209.
43.
McLeod, J.M., D.A. Scheufele and P. Moy ( 1999) ‘Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation’ , Political Communication16(3): 315-36.
44.
Nie, N. and L. Erbring ( 2000) ‘Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report’ , Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society , URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/Press_Release/internetStudy.html
45.
Norris, P. ( 1996) ‘Does Television Erode Social Capital? A Reply to Putnam’, PS: Political Science and Politics29(3): 474-80.
46.
Oksman, V. and P. Rautiainen ( 2003) ‘"Perhaps it is a Body Part": How the Mobile Phone Became an Organic Part of the Everyday Lives of Finnish Children and Teenagers’ , in J. Katz (ed.), Machines that Become Us: The Social Context of Communication Technology, pp. 293-308. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
47.
Putnam, R.D. ( 1993) ‘The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life’, The American Prospect13(4): 35-42.
48.
Putnam, R.D. ( 1995) ‘Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital’, Journal of Democracy6(1): 65-78.
49.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
50.
Rheingold, H. ( 1993) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. New York: HarperCollins .
51.
Rizzo, L., J.M. Brick and I. Park ( 2004) ‘A Minimally Intrusive Method for Sampling Persons in Random Digit Dial Surveys’, Public Opinion Quarterly68(2): 267-74.
52.
Shah, D.V. ( 1998) ‘Civic Engagement, Interpersonal Trust, and Television Use: An Individual Level Assessment of Social Capital’, Political Psychology19(3): 469-96.
53.
Shah, D.V., J. Cho, W.P. Eveland Jr and N. Kwak ( 2005) ‘Information and Expression in a Digital Age: Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation’, Communication Research32(5): 531-65.
54.
Shah, D.V., N. Kwak and R.L. Holbert ( 2001a) ‘"Connecting" and "Disconnecting" with Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital’, Political Communication18(2): 141-62.
55.
Shah, D.V., J.M. McLeod and S.-H. Yoon ( 2001b) ‘Communication, Context, and Community: An Exploration of Print, Broadcast, and Internet Influences’, Communication Research28(4): 464-506.
56.
Schmitz, J. and J. Fulk ( 1991) ‘Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail: A Test of the Social Influence Model of Technology Use’ , Communication Research18(4): 487-523.
57.
Sotirovic, M. and J.M. McLeod ( 2001) ‘Values, Communication Behavior, and Political Participation’ , Political Communication18(3): 273-300.
58.
University of Michigan (2006) ‘On the Move: The Role of Cellular Communications in American Life’ , University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, URL (consulted May 2007): http://141.211.177.75/UofM/Content/comm/document/OnTheMove.pdf
59.
Verba, S., K.L. Schlozman and H.E. Brady ( 1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
Wellman, B. ( 2002) ‘Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism’ , in M. Tanabe, P. van den Besselaar and T. Ishida (eds) Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches, pp. 10-25. Berlin : Springer-Verlag.
61.
Wellman, B., J. Boase and W. Chen ( 2002) ‘The Networked Nature of Community Online and Offline’ , IT & Society1(1): 151-65, URL (consulted May 2007): http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/itandsociety/v01i01/v01i01a10.pdf
62.
Wellman, B., A. Quan-Haase, J. Boase, W. Chen, K.N. Hampton, I.I. de Diaz and K. Miyata ( 2003) ‘The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism’, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication8(3), URL (consulted May 2007): http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/wellman.html
