Punitiveness and atrocity: Why do some Filipinos support mass violence?

Abstract

Amidst the aftermath of the controversial war on drugs during Duterte's presidency in the Philippines, this study seeks to understand characteristics of Filipino punitiveness. The institutionalization of state violence, historical context of authoritarian rule, and societal acceptance of extreme measures prompt an examination of public attitudes toward crime, punishment, and violence in the Philippines. This study used survey data on Filipino respondents and identified five distinct punitiveness clusters using latent class analysis. This study employed Kruskal–Wallis (KW) tests and chi-squared tests to explore factors associated with differences in cluster characteristics. The analysis found that the extremely punitive group exhibited significantly higher levels of satisfaction with President Marcos Jr., a strong preference for authoritarian detachment, and lower trust in institutions compared to the other clusters. They support harsher penal policies including informal or extralegal methods such as torture, social cleansing, and use of violence to attain social progress. This study confirms the convergence of punitiveness and penal populism, where highly punitive citizens endorse strong leaders and extralegal measures that result in atrocities.

Keywords

punitive attitudes extremely punitive individual Philippines authoritarianism atrocity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adriaenssen

Aertsen

(2015) Punitive attitudes: Towards an operationalization to measure individual punitivity in a multidimensional way. European Journal of Criminology 12(1): 92–112.

Alba

(2018) How Duterte used Facebook to fuel the Philippine drug war. Buzzfeed News . Available at: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/daveyalba/facebook-philippines-dutertes-drug-war (accessed 24 January 2024).

Arugay

Batac

Street

(2021) An explosive cocktail—Counter-terrorism, militarisation and authoritarianism in the Philippines. Available at: https://www.saferworld-global.org/resources/publications/1351-an-explosive-cocktail-counter-terrorism-militarisation-and-authoritarianism-in-the-philippines (accessed 24 January 2024).

Barker

(2009) The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way America Punishes Offenders. New York: Oxford Academic.

Bateson

(2012) Crime victimization and political participation. American Political Science Review 106(3): 570–587.

Beckett

(1999) Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Braithwaite

(2020) Crime as a cascade phenomenon. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 44(3): 137–169.

Buan

(2021) Prosecutor Bensuoda: Duterte policy enabled killings and cover-up. Rappler. Available at: https://www.rappler.com/philippines/icc-prosecutor-besouda-duterte-policy-enabled-ejks-coverup/ (accessed 13 June 2024).

Caliwan

(2018) Close to 153k drug cases filed 2 years into drug war. Available at: https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1043196 (accessed 6 August 2024).

10.

Castillo

RCA

(2021) A politics and ethics of viewing photographs of Duterte’s “drug war”: Towards reconceptualizing the political community. AKDA 1(2): 54–70.

11.

CHRP (2023) In defense of the right to life: Analyzing factors affecting Filipino opinion about death penalty. Available at: https://www.righttolifeph.online/uploads/cms_uploads/in_defense_of_the_right_to_life_analyzing_factors_affecting_filipino-compressed.pdf (accessed 5 June 2024).

12.

Cohen

(1994) Social control and the politics of reconstruction. In: Nelken

(ed) The Futures of Criminology. London: Sage Publications, 63–88.

13.

Cruz

(2014) PH has slowest justice system in the world. Inquirer. Available at: https://opinion.inquirer.net/80394/ph-has-slowest-justice-system-in-the-world-2 (accessed 26 July 2024).

14.

Curato

(2016) Politics of anxiety, politics of hope: Penal populism and Duterte’s rise to power. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 35(3): 91–109.

15.

Deinla

Ballar

Mendoza

GAS

, et al. (2023b) Beyond democrats and authoritarians: Clustering democratic attitudes in the Philippines. Ateneo School of Government Working Paper No. 23-007, 21 July. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4520290 (accessed 24 January 2024).

16.

Deinla

Ballar

Refani

, et al. (2023a) Introducing the Philippine Electoral Violence (PEV) dataset: Uncovering trends, targets, and perpetrators of election-related violence during the 2013–2019 elections. Asian Politics & Polity 15(2): 249–273.

17.

De Jesus

(2021). National security, anti-corruption, and anti-crime policies in the Duterte administration. Ateneo School of Government Working Paper No. 21-023, 19 July. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3888122 (accessed 20 November 2023).

18.

Duckitt

Sibley

(2010) Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality 78(6): 1861–1894.

19.

Evans

Adams

(2003) Salvation or damnation? Religion and correctional ideology. American Journal of Criminal Justice 28(1): 15–35.

20.

Fox

Van Sickel

Steiger

(2007) Tabloid Justice: Criminal Justice in an Age of Media Frenzy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

21.

Francisco

(2016) Shoot to kill? Duterte’s statements on killing drug users. Rappler. Available at: https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/148295-philippines-president-rodrigo-duterte-statements-shoot-to-kill-drug-war/ (accessed 12 June 2024).

22.

Freiberg

(2001) Affective versus effective justice: Instrumentalism and emotionalism in criminal justice. Punishment & Society 3(2): 265–278.

23.

Garland

(2012) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

24.

Gavilan

(2022) Six years of blood and violence: People we lost under Duterte. Rappler. Available at: https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/duterte-administration-blood-violence-drug-war-lawyers-activists-mayors-vice-mayors-killed/ (accessed 22 January 2024).

25.

Gerbner

Gross

Morgan

, et al. (1980) The mainstreaming of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communications 30: 10–29.

26.

Girelli

(2021) ‘Alternative facts’: public opinion surveys on the death penalty for drug offences in selected Asian countries. International Journal of Drug Policy 92: 103155.

27.

Hanslmaier

Baier

(2016) Re-examining the relationship between religion and punitiveness: Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Criminology 13(4): 473–490.

28.

Hope Sr.

(2016) Police Corruption and Police Reforms in Developing Societies. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge.

29.

Huang

(2020) The mediated and mediatised justice-seeking: Chinese digital vigilantism from 2006 to 2018. Internet Histories 5(3–4): 304–322.

30.

International Criminal Court (2021) Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15(3).

31.

International Criminal Court. Available at: https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2021_05381.PDF (22 January 2024).

32.

Intravia

(2018) Investigating the influence of social media consumption on punitive attitudes among a sample of U.S. university students. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 63(2): 309–333.

33.

James

Witten

Hastie

, et al. (2023) An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in Python. London: Springer Nature.

34.

Johnson

(2009) Anger about crime and support for punitive criminal justice policies. Punishment and Society 11(1): 51–66.

35.

Karstedt

Endtricht

(2022) Crime and punishment: Public opinion and political law-and-order rhetoric in Europe 1996–2019. The British Journal of Criminology 62(5): 1116–1135.

36.

Kenny

Holmes

(2020) A new penal populism? Rodrigo Duterte, public opinion, and the war on drugs in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies 20(2): 187–205.

37.

Labor

PDP

Gastardo-Conaco

MCC

(2017) The role of social perceptions, beliefs, and emotions on support for punitive action toward drug dealers and users. Philippine Journal of Psychology 50(2): 67–96.

38.

Lasco

(2020) Drugs and drug wars as populist tropes in Asia: Illustrative examples and implications for drug policy. International Journal of Drug Policy 77: 102668.

39.

Linzer

Lewis

(2011) poLCA: An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 42: 1–29.

40.

Marquez

(2020) Drop in crime rate proves govt winning drug war—PNP’s Eleazar. Available at: https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1210567/pnps-eleazar-decline-in-crime-rate-helped-in-winning-drug-war (accessed 9 August 2024).

41.

Matthews

(2005) The myth of punitiveness. Theoretical Criminology 9(2): 175–201.

42.

Mendoza

GAS

Deinla

Domingo

, et al. (2024) Coattailing for continuity? Unraveling Duterte’s legacy in Marcos Jr.’s 2022 electoral victory. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs (Online First). 0(0): 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034241270270.

43.

Nivette

(2016) Institutional ineffectiveness, illegitimacy, and public support for vigilantism in Latin America. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal 54(1): 142–175.

44.

Oliphant

(2018) Public support for the death penalty ticks up. Pew Research Center, 11 June. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2018/06/11/us-support-for-death-penalty-ticks-up-2018/ (accessed 28 January 2024).

45.

Oliquino

(2024) PBBM’s ‘bloodless’ drug war, ‘more effective, more humane’—Lawmaker. Daily Tribune. Available at: https://tribune.net.ph/2024/07/24/pbbms-bloodless-drug-war-more-effective-humane-lawmaker (accessed 26 July 2024).

46.

Paris

(2015) UP fratman, jailed for 6 years, returns to fix prison system. Rappler. Available at: https://www.rappler.com/moveph/99168-raymund-narag-up-frat-prison-reforms/ (accessed 26 July 2024).

47.

Pernia

(2021) Authoritarian values and institutional trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from the Philippines. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 7(2): 204–232.

48.

Pratt

Brown

, et al. (2005) The New Punitiveness. Cullompton: William Publishing.

49.

Preud’Homme

Duarte

Dalleau

, et al. (2021) Head-to-head comparison of clustering methods for heterogeneous data: A simulation-driven benchmark. Scientific Reports 11(1): 4202.

50.

Reyes

(2016) The spectacle of violence in Duterte’s “war on drugs”. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 35(3): 111–137.

51.

Roberts

Stalans

Indermauer

, et al. (2003) Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons from Five Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

52.

Savelsberg

(1999) Knowledge, domination and criminal punishment revisited: Incorporating state socialism. Punishment & Society 1(1): 45–70.

53.

Simon

(2007) Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.

54.

Tyler

(2011) Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe. European Journal of Criminology 8(4): 254–266.

55.

Tyler

Boeckmann

(1997) Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law & Society Review 31: 237–265.

56.

Unnever

Cullen

(2010) Social sources of Americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal 48(1): 99–129.

57.

UNODC (2023) The Philippines addresses jails and prison overcrowding. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/roseap/en/philippines/2023/12/jails-prisons-overcrowding/story.html (accessed 25 July 2024).

58.

Uyheng

(2021) Power-differentiated emotions of populist support: Regional anger and classed fear in Duterte’s Philippines. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 27(4): 689–693.

59.

Valenzuela

(2024) Under Marcos, the Philippines drug war drags on. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/philippines-drug-war-what-changed-under-president-marcos/a-68635719 (accessed 5 June 2024).

60.

Weller

Bowen

(2020) Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology 46(4): 287–311.

61.

Wood

(2014) Punitive populism. In: Miller

(ed) The Encyclopedia of Theoretical Criminology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1–4.

62.

Zimring

Johnson

(2006) Public opinion and the governance of punishment in democratic political systems. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605(1): 265–280.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB