Abstract
Ethnographic studies of collective trauma often overlook the ways emotion surfaces beyond speech, in silences, atmospheres, and bodily cues. This paper introduces Emotion-as-Method (EAM), a layered ethnographic framework that treats emotion as both evidence and method, functioning simultaneously as an analytic framework for interpreting data and as a research approach practiced throughout fieldwork. EAM specifies six analytic constructs (mood and intensity, collective affect, safety and trust, shame and stigma, agency and disempowerment, and trauma responses) read across three layers: self-report, behavioral–linguistic, and contextual. The unit of analysis is the episode, a bounded moment where shifts in voice, posture, or atmosphere become analytically visible. Triangulating across layers distinguishes convergence and dissonance, revealing how trauma is lived, withheld, or transformed within wider infrastructures of memory and power. By formalizing these practices, EAM offers ethnographers a transferable scaffold that strengthens methodological rigor and expands how qualitative research can witness and interpret collective trauma.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
