This article presents a novel methodological program for frame analysis of textual
data and discusses its application in cross-national research. The proposed approach
systematizes recent theoretical developments in frame analyses, and offers a
step-by-step program for frame identification and measurement, which synthesizes the
implications of aforementioned developments into a coherent methodological
framework. Frames are identified with analysis techniques borrowed from
sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, and dictionary-free quantitative content
analysis. The results of the identification process are subsequently validated via
latent class analyses of data matrices, which are obtained with the help of coding
techniques that utilize computer-assisted qualitative software packages. Since more
interpretative, qualitative elements of frame analysis are combined with
quantitative content analysis, findings are of high conceptual validity and
generalizability. Comparative broadening of the approach considerably improves the
quality of the detected frames.
Aldenderfer, M.S.
and
Blashfield, R.K.
(1984) Cluster Analysis.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
.
2.
Andsager, J.L.
,
Austin, E.W.
and
Pinkleton, B.E.
(2001)
‘Questioning the Value of Realism: Young Adults’
Processing of Messages in Alcohol-Related Public Service Announcements and Advertising’
, Journal of Communication51(1):
121-142
.
3.
Antaki, C.
,
Billig, M.
,
Edwards, D.
and
Potter, J.
(2003)
‘Discourse Analysis Means Doing Analysis: A Critique of Six
Analytic Shortcomings’
, Discourse Analysis Online1, URL (consulted 5 January 2005): http://www.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a1/antaki2002002.html
4.
Bauman, Z.
(1992)
‘Soil, Blood and Identity’
, The Sociological Review40(4):
675-701
.
5.
Benford, R.D.
(1997)
‘An Insider’s Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective’
, Sociological Inquiry67(4):
409-430
.
6.
Benford, R.D.
and
Snow, D.A.
(2000)
‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment’
, Annual Review of Sociology26:
11-39
.
7.
Billig, M.
(1995) Banal Nationalism.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
8.
Bolden, R.
and
Moscarola, J.
(2000)
‘Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide: The Lexical
Approach to Textual Data Analysis’
, Social Science Computer Review18(4):
450-460
.
9.
Brubaker, R.
(1994)
‘Rethinking Nationhood: Nation as Institutionalized Form,
Practical Category, Contingent Event’
, Contention4(1):
3-14
.
10.
Burstein, J.
,
Marcu, D.
,
Andreyev, S.
and
Chodorov, M.
(2004) ‘Towards Automatic Classification of
Discourse Elements in Essays’, URL (consulted 5 January 2005): http://www.ets.org/research/dload/burstein.pdf
11.
Calhoun, C.
(1999)
‘Nationalism, Political Community and the Representation of
Society: Or, Why Feeling at Home is Not a Substitute for Public Space’
, European Journal of Social Theory2(2):
217-231
.
12.
Cappella, J.N.
and
Jamieson, K.H.
(1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public
Good.
New York, NY: Oxford University Press
.
13.
d’Angelo, P.
(2002)
‘News Framing as a Multi-paradigmatic Research Program: A
Response to Entman’
, Journal of Communication52(4):
870-888
.
14.
d’Anjou, L.
and
van Male, J.
(1998)
‘Between the Old and the New: Social Movements and Cultural Change’
, Mobilization3(2):
207-226
.
15.
d’Haenens, L.
and
de Lange, M.
(2001)
‘Framing of Asylum Seekers in Dutch Regional Newspapers’
, Media, Culture & Society23(6):
847-860
.
16.
de Vreese, C.H.
(2002) Framing Europe: Television News and European
Integration.
Amsterdam: Aksant
.
17.
de Vreese, C.H.
,
Peter, J.
and
Semetko, H.A.
(2001)
‘Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Cross-national
Comparative Study of Frames in the News’
, Political Communication18(2):
107-122
.
18.
Downey, J.W.
and
Koenig, T.
(2004)
‘Nationalization vs. Europeanization vs. Globalization of Issues
that Should Belong to the European Public Sphere’
, ESA Conference ‘New Directions in European
Media’, Thessalonica, Greece, 3-5
November 2004.
19.
Eder, K.
(1995) ‘The Institutionalization of
Environmentalism: Ecological Discourse and the Second Transformation of the
Public Sphere’, in
S. Lash
,
B. Szerszynski
and
B. Wynne
(eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity, pp.
1-25.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
.
20.
Entman, R.M.
(1993)
‘Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm’
, Journal of Communication43(1):
51-58
.
21.
European Parliament
(2003) ‘Session of July 2, 2003’,
URL (consulted 1 November 2004): http://www3.europarl.eu.int/omk/omnsapir.so/calendar?APP=PDF&FILE=20030702i.pdf&TYPE=CRE
22.
Ferree, M.M.
,
Gamson, W.A.
,
Gerhards, J.
and
Rucht, D.
(2002) Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public
Sphere in Germany and the United States.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
23.
Gallmann, P.
(1991) ‘Wort, Lexem und
Lemma’, in
G. Augst
and
B. Schaeder
(eds) Rechtschreibwörterbücher in der Diskussion:
Geschichte - Analyse - Perspektiven, pp. 261-280.
Frankfurt a/M: Peter Lang
.
24.
Gamson, W.A.
(1975)
‘Review of “Frame Analysis” by Erving Goffman’
, Contemporary Sociology4(6):
603-607
.
25.
Gamson, W.A.
(1992) Talking Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
26.
Gitlin, T.
(1980) The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making
and Unmaking of the New Left.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
27.
Goffman, E.
(1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of
Experience.
New York, NY: Harper & Row
.
28.
Hagenaars, J.
and
Halman, L.C.
(1989)
‘Searching for Ideal Types: The Potentialities of Latent Class Analysis’
, European Sociological Review5:
81-96
.
29.
Hallin, D.C.
and
Mancini, P.
(2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and
Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
30.
Iyengar, S.
(1991) Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political
Issues.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
31.
Koopmans, R.
and
Statham, P.
(1999)
‘Challenging the Liberal Nation-State? Postnationalism,
Multiculturalism, and the Collective Claims Making of Migrants and Ethnic
Minorities in Britain and Germany’
, American Journal of Sociology105(3):
652-696
.
32.
Landmann, J. and Züll, C. (2004)
‘Computerunterstützte Inhaltsanalyse ohne Diktionär? Ein
Praxistest’, ZUMA-Nachrichten 54: 117-40.
33.
Lazarsfeld, P.F.
(1950) ‘The Logical and Mathematical Foundations
of Latent Structure Analysis’, in
S.A Stouffer
(ed.) Measurement and Prediction, pp.
362-412.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
34.
Magidson, J.
and
Vermunt, J.K.
(2004) ‘Comparing Latent Class Factor Analysis
with Traditional Factor Analysis for Datamining’, in
H. Bozdogan
(ed.) Statistical Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pp.
373-383.
Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC
.
35.
Maher, T.M.
(2001) ‘Framing: An Emerging Paradigm or a Phase
of Agenda Setting’, in
S.D. Reese
,
O.H. Gandy
and
A.E. Grant
(eds) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding
of the Social World, pp. 83-94.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
.
36.
McAdam, D.
(1996) ‘The Framing Function of Movement
Tactics: Strategic Dramaturgy in the American Civil Rights
Movement’, in
D. McAdam
,
J.D. McCarthy
and
M.N. Zald
(eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political
Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings, pp.
338-355.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
37.
McCutcheon, A.
(1987) Latent Class Analysis.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage
.
38.
Miller, M.M.
(1997)
‘Frame Mapping and Analysis of News Coverage of Contentious Issues’
, Social Science Computer Review15(4):
367-378
.
39.
Miller, M.M.
and
Riechert, B.P.
(2001) ‘The Spiral of Opportunity and Frame
Resonance: Mapping the Issue Cycle in News and Public
Discourse’, in
S.D. Reese
,
O.H. Gandy
and
A.E. Grant
(eds) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding
of the Social World, pp. 107-121.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
.
40.
Price, V.
,
Tewksbury, D.
and
Powers, E.
(1997)
‘Switching Trains of Thought: The Impact of News Frames on
Readers’ Cognitive Responses’
, Communication Research24(5):
481-506
.
41.
Raftery, A.
(1995)
‘Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research’
, Sociological Methodology24:
112-165
.
42.
Reisigl, M.
and
Wodak, R.
(2001) Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and
Antisemitism.
New York, NY: Routledge
.
43.
Risse, T.
and
van de Steeg, M.
(2003)
‘An Emerging European Public Sphere? Empirical Evidence and
Theoretical Clarifications’
, Conference on the Europeanisation of Public Spheres, Political
Mobilisation, Public Communication and the European Union
(20-22 June 2003, Berlin), URL
(consulted 5 July 2005): http://www.fuberlin.de/atasp/texte/030624_europeanpublicsphere.pdf
44.
Sartori, G.
(1970)
‘Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics’
, American Political Science Review64(4):
1033-1053
.
45.
Scheufele, D.A.
(1999)
‘Framing as a Theory of Media Effects’
, Journal of Communication49(1):
103-122
.
46.
Semetko, H.A.
and
Valkenburg, P.M.
(2000)
‘Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and
Television News’
, Journal of Communication50(1):
93-109
.
47.
Smelser, N.J.
(1976) Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
.
48.
Smith, A.E.
(2000)
‘Machine Mapping of Document Collections: The Leximancer System’
, Proceedings of the Fifth Australasian Document Computing
Symposium. Melbourne, Australia.
49.
Snow, D.A.
,
Rochford, E.B.
,
Worden, S.K.
and
Benford, R.D.
(1986)
‘Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Movement Participation’
, American Sociological Review51(4):
464-481
.
50.
Tankard, J.W., Jr.
(2001) ‘The Empirical Approach to the Study of
Media Framing’, in
S.D. Reese
,
O.H. Gandy
and
A.E. Grant
(eds) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and our Understanding
of the Social World, pp. 95-106.
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
.
51.
Trenz, H.-J.
(2004)
‘Media Coverage on European Governance: Exploring the European
Public Sphere in National Quality Newspapers’
, European Journal of Communication19(3):
291-319
.
52.
van de Mieroop, D.
(2005)
‘An Integrated Approach of Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis
in the Study of Identity in Speeches’
, Discourse & Society16(1):
107-130
.
53.
van de Steeg, M.
(2002)
‘Rethinking the Conditions for a Public Sphere in the European Union’
, European Journal of Social Theory5(4):
499-519
.
54.
Wetherell, M.
(1998)
‘Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation
Analysis and Post-structuralism in Dialogue’
, Discourse & Society9(3):
387-412
.
55.
Williams, R.H.
(1995)
‘Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources’
, Social Problems42(1):
124-144
.
