This study illustrates a critique of circular fashion practices using empirical insights from upcycling to highlight its potentials and limits for a degrowth transition in circular fashion. Acknowledging valuable marketing research on the motivations, benefits, and challenges of consumer upcycling, we investigate the often-overlooked domain of institutional upcycling practices, through interviews with diverse industry actors and secondary data analysis. Our analysis advances critical and theoretical debates on degrowth and circular fashion by examining how the socio-ecological value of upcycled waste is realized through institutional upcycling practices. Accordingly, we elucidate the emerging dynamics of degrowth circularity, demonstrating how these dynamics challenge and expand the degrowth principle of conviviality. Findings articulate the diverse convivialities necessary for a degrowth transition in circular fashion. Specifically, we highlight neo-material and more-than-human relationality as essential organizing principles of conviviality for degrowth circularity.
AlexanderS (2015) Sufficiency Economy: Enough, for Everyone, Forever. Melbourne, Australia: Simplicity Institute.
2.
AtikDErtekinZO (2023) Desire for the new versus sustainability: conflicting needs in fashion consumption. Journal of Social Marketing13(1): 1–19. DOI: 10.1108/JSOCM-02-2022-0036.
3.
BajdeDRojas-GaviriaP (2021) Creating responsible subjects: the role of mediated affective encounters. Journal of Consumer Research48(3): 492–512. DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucab019.
4.
BanerjeeSBJermierJMPeredoAM, et al. (2021) Theoretical perspectives on organizations and organizing in a post-growth era. Organization28(3): 337–357. DOI: 10.1177/1350508420973629.
5.
BaradKM (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
BeachamJ (2018) Organising food differently: towards a more-than-human ethics of care for the anthropocene. Organization25(4): 533–549. DOI: 10.1177/1350508418777893.
7.
BeudaertA (2023) The metastatic spread of plastics in consumer society: a reading through the lens of counter-productivity and conviviality. Consumption, Markets and Culture26(5): 386–396. DOI: 10.1080/10253866.2023.2226609.
8.
BockenNMPde PauwIBakkerC, et al. (2016) Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial Production Engineering33: 308–320. DOI: 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124.
9.
BonnedahlKJHeikkurinenP (2019) The case for strong sustainability. In: BonnedahlKJHeikkurinenP (eds) Strongly Sustainable Societies: Organizing Human Activities on a Hot and Full Earth. Abington, PA: Routledge, 1–20.
10.
BramstonDMaycroftN (2013) Designing with waste. In: KaranaEPedgleyORognoliV (eds) Materials Experience: Fundamentals of Materials and Design. Oxfordm, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann, 123–133.
11.
BridgensBPowellMFarmerG, et al. (2018) Creative upcycling: reconnecting people, materials and place through making. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering189: 145–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.317.
12.
BurlinghamB (2016) Small Giants: Companies that Choose to Be Great Instead of Big. New York, NY: Penguin.
13.
Calisto FriantMVermeulenWJVSalomoneR (2020) A typology of circular economy discourses: navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm. Resources, Conservation and Recycling161: 104917. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917.
14.
CannifordRShankarA (2013) Purifying practices: how consumers assemble romantic experiences of nature. Journal of Consumer Research39(5): 1051–1069. DOI: 10.1086/667202.
15.
CapraFJakobsenOD (2017) A conceptual framework for ecological economics based on systemic principles of life. International Journal of Social Economics44(6): 831–844. DOI: 10.1108/IJSE-05-2016-0136.
16.
CarringtonMJZwickDNevilleB (2016) The ideology of the ethical consumption gap. Marketing Theory16(1): 21–38.
17.
CassidyDHanS (2013) Upcycling fashion for mass production. In: GardettiMTorresA (eds) Sustainability in Fashion and Textiles: Values, Design, Production and Consumption. London, UK: Routledge, 148–163.
18.
CataldiCDicksonMGroverC (2010) Slow Fashion: Tailoring a Strategic Approach Towards Sustainability. Masters Thesis. Karlskrona, Sweden: Blekinge Institute of Technology.
19.
CayleyD (2005) The Rivers North of thefFuture: The Testament of Ivan Illich, as Told to David Cayley. Toronto, ON: Anansi Press.
20.
ChatzidakisALarsenGBishopS (2014) Farewell to consumerism: countervailing logics of growth in consumption. Ephemera: theory and politics in organization14(4): 753–764.
21.
ChatzidakisAMaclaranPVarmanR (2021) The regeneration of consumer movement solidarity. Journal of Consumer Research48(2): 289–308. DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucab007.
22.
CherrierHTüreM (2022) Blame work and the scapegoating mechanism in market status-quo. Journal of Business Research144: 1207–1217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.061.
23.
ClarkH (2008) Slow fashion: an oxymoron or a promise for the future ?Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body & Culture12(4): 427–446.
24.
CoffinJEgan-WyerC (2022) The ethical consumption cap and mean market morality. Marketing Theory22(1): 105–123. DOI: 10.1177/14705931211058772.
25.
CoppolaCVolleroASianoA (2021) Consumer upcycling as emancipated self-production: understanding motivations and identifying upcycler types. Journal of Cleaner Production285: 124812. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124812.
26.
CristianoSAuriemmaMCacciariP, et al. (2020) Nourishing self-planned socioecological transformations. In: NelsonAEdwardsF (eds) Food for Degrowth. London, UK: Routledge, 90–99.
27.
DescolaP (2013) Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DolbecPYFischerE (2015) Refashioning a field? Connected consumers and institutional dynamics in markets. Journal of Consumer Research41(6): 1447–1468. DOI: 10.1086/680671.
30.
D’AlisaGDemariaFKallisG (eds) (2014) Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era. New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
ErgeneSCalásMB (2023) Becoming naturecultural: rethinking sustainability for a more-than-human world. Organization Studies44(12): 1961–1986. DOI: 10.1177/01708406231175293.
32.
ErgeneSBanerjeeSBHoffmanA (2020) (Un)Sustainability and organization studies: towards a radical engagement. Organization Studies42(8): 1319–1335. DOI: 10.1177/0170840620937892.
33.
ErtekinZOAtikD (2015) Sustainable markets: motivating factors, barriers, and remedies for mobilization of slow fashion. Journal of Macromarketing35(1): 53–69. DOI: 10.1177/0276146714535932.
34.
ErtekinZOAtikD (2020) Institutional constituents of change for a sustainable fashion system. Journal of Macromarketing40(3): 362–379. DOI: 10.1177/0276146720932274.
35.
FisherBTrontoJC (1990) Toward a feminist theory of care. In: AbelENelsonM (eds) Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives. Albany, GA: State University of New York Press, 35–62.
FletcherKThamM (2019) Earth Logic: Fashion Action Research Plan. London, UK: The J J Charitable Trust.
38.
GenoveseAPanseraM (2020) The circular economy at a crossroads: technocratic eco-modernism or convivial technology for social revolution?Capitalism Nature Socialism32(2): 95–113. DOI: 10.1080/10455752.2020.1763414.
39.
Georgescu-RoegenN (1971) The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
40.
GertenbachLLamlaJLaserS (2021) Eating ourselves out of industrial excess? Degrowth, multi-species conviviality and the micro-politics of cultured meat. Anthropological Theory21(3): 386–408. DOI: 10.1177/1463499620981544.
41.
Gibson-GrahamJK (2006) A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
GieslerMVeresiuE (2014) Creating the responsible consumer: moralistic governance regimes and consumer subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Research41: 840–857. DOI: 10.1086/677842.
43.
GodfreyDMPriceLLLuschRF (2022) Repair, consumption, and sustainability: fixing fragile objects and maintaining consumer practices. Journal of Consumer Research49(2): 229–251. DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucab067.
44.
GossenMHeinrichA (2021) Encouraging consumption reduction: findings of a qualitative study with clothing companies on sufficiency-promoting communication. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption3: 100028. DOI: 10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100028.
45.
GrovesC (2019) Sustainability and the future: reflections on the ethical and political significance of sustainability. Sustainability Science14(4): 915–924.
46.
HankammerSKleerRMühlL, et al. (2021) Principles for organizations striving for sustainable degrowth: framework development and application to four B Corps. Journal of Cleaner Production300: 126818. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126818.
47.
HarawayDJ (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
48.
HarrisFRobyHDibbS (2016) Sustainable clothing: challenges, barriers and interventions for encouraging more sustainable consumer behaviour. International Journal of Consumer Studies40(3): 309–318. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12257.
49.
HawkinsG (2006) The Ethics of Waste: How We Relate to Rubbish. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
50.
HickelJ (2021) What does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification. Globalizations18(7): 1105–1111. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222.
51.
HintonJ (2021) Five key dimensions of post-growth business: putting the pieces together. Futures131: 102761. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2021.102761.
52.
HossainMParkSKSuchekN, et al. (2024) Circular economy: a review of review articles. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34557.58081.
53.
IllichI (1973) Tools for Conviviality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
54.
JacksonT (2021) Post Growth—Life after Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
55.
KallisG (2018) In Defense of Degrowth: Opinions and Minifestos. Uneven Earth Press.
56.
KallisGKerschnerCMartinez-AlierJ (2012) The economics of degrowth. Ecological Economics84: 172–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.017.
57.
KallisGKostakisVLangeS, et al. (2018) Research on degrowth. Annual Review of Environment and Resources43: 291–316. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025941.
58.
KamleitnerBThürridlCMartinBA (2019) A Cinderella story: how past identity salience boosts demand for repurposed products. Journal of Marketing83(6): 76–92. DOI: 10.1177/0022242919872156.
59.
KerschnerCWächterPNierlingL, et al. (2018) Degrowth and technology: towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries. Journal of Cleaner Production197: 1619–1636. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.147.
60.
KirchherrJReikeDHekkertM (2017) Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling127: 221–232. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
61.
KostakisVLatoufisKLiarokapisM, et al. (2018) The convergence of digital commons with local manufacturing from a degrowth perspective: two illustrative cases. Journal of Cleaner Production197(2): 1684–1693. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.077.
62.
KropfeldMIReichelA (2021) The Business model of enough: value creation for sufficiency-oriented businesses. In: AagaardALüdeke-FreundFWellsP (eds) Business Models for Sustainability Transitions. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77580-3_6.
63.
KvaleS (1996) Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64.
LatoucheS (2009) Farewell to Growth. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
65.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
66.
LawJMolA (2008) Globalisation in practice: on the politics of boiling pigswill. Geoforum39(1): 133–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.08.010.
LimWM (2017) Inside the sustainable consumption theoretical toolbox: critical concepts for sustainability, consumption, and marketing. Journal of Business Research78(September): 69–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.001.
69.
LloverasJQuinnL (2017) Growth and its discontents: paving the way for a more productive engagement with alternative economic practices. Journal of Macromarketing37(2): 131–142. DOI: 10.1177/0276146716670213.
70.
LloverasJQuinnLParkerC (2018) Reclaiming sustainable space: a study of degrowth activists. Marketing Theory18(2): 188–202. DOI: 10.1177/1470593117732458.
71.
LloverasJWarnabyGQuinnL (2020) Mutualism as market practice: an examination of market performativity in the context of anarchism and its implications for post-capitalist politics. Marketing Theory20(3): 229–249. DOI: 10.1177/1470593119885172.
72.
LloverasJMarshallAPVandeventerJS, et al. (2022) Sustainability marketing beyond sustainable development: towards a degrowth agenda. Journal of Marketing Management38(17-18): 2055–2077. DOI: 10.1080/0267257X.2022.2084443.
73.
MarchaisDRouxDArnouldE (2024) Hybridization of human–nature relationships and shifts in consumption practices: an analysis through the lens of Descola’s ontologies. Recherche et Applications en Marketing39(2): 2–29. DOI: 10.1177/20515707231221423.
McEachernMGMiddletonDCassidyT (2020) Encouraging sustainable behaviour change via a social practice approach: a focus on apparel consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Policy43: 397–418. DOI: 10.1007/s10603-020-09454-0.
76.
McGreevySRRupprechtCDDNilesD, et al. (2022) Sustainable agrifood systems for a post-growth world. Nature Sustainability5: 1011–1017. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-022-00933-5.
77.
MeadowsDHMeadowsDLRandersJ, et al. (1972) The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York, NY: Universe Books.
78.
MesirantaNNärvänenEMattilaM (2021) Framings of food waste: how food system stakeholders are responsibilized in public policy debate. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing41(2): 144–161. DOI: 10.1177/07439156211005722.
79.
MoustakasC (1994) Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
NaessA (1989) Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81.
NesterovaI (2020) Degrowth business framework: implications for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production262: 121382. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121382.
PalmCCornellSHäyhäT (2021) Making resilient decisions for sustainable circularity of fashion. Circular Economy and Sustainability1(2): 651–670. DOI: 10.1007/S43615-021-00040-1.
84.
PanseraMFressoliM (2021) Innovation without growth: frameworks for understanding technological change in a postgrowth era. Organization28(3): 380–404. DOI: 10.1177/1350508420973631.
85.
PanseraMEhlersMKerschnerC (2019) Unlocking wise digital techno-futures: contributions from the Degrowth community. Futures114: 102474. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2019.102474.
86.
ParasMKCurtezaAVarshneyaG (2019) Identification of best reverse value chain alternatives: a study of Romanian used clothing industry. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management23(3): 396–412. DOI: 10.1108/JFMM-04-2018-0060.
87.
ParriqueT (2022) Ralentir ou périr: L’economie de la décroissance. Paris: Seuil.
88.
PayneA (2019) Fashion futuring in the Anthropocene: sustainable fashion as “taming” and “rewilding.”. Fashion Theory23(1): 5–23. DOI: 10.1080/1362704X.2017.1374097.
89.
Puig de la BellacasaM (2017) Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
90.
SaviniF (2023) Futures of the social metabolism: degrowth, circular economy and the value of waste. Futures150: 103180. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103180.
91.
ScarabotoD (2022) Sustainable consumption: more using, less shopping. NIM Marketing Intelligence Review14(1): 11–17. DOI: 10.2478/nimmir-2022-0002.
92.
ScarabotoDFischerE (2013) Frustrated fatshionistas: An institutional theory perspective on consumer quests for greater choice in mainstream markets. Journal of Consumer Research39(6): 1234–1257. DOI: 10.1086/668298.
SchneiderFKallisGMartinez-AlierJ (2010) Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production18(6): 511–518. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014.
95.
SchumacherEF (1993) Small Is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London, UK: Vintage Books.
96.
ScottKMartinDMSchoutenJW (2014) Marketing and the new materialism. Journal of Macromarketing34(3): 282–290. DOI: 10.1177/0276146714532471.
97.
SekulovaFKallisGRodriguez-LabajosBSchneiderF (2013) Degrowth: From theory to practice. Journal of Cleaner Production38: 1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.022.
98.
SinghJSungKCooperT, et al. (2019) Challenges and opportunities for scaling up upcycling businesses: the case of textile and wood upcycling businesses in the UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling150: 104439. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104439.
99.
SpiggleS (1994) Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research21(3): 491–503. DOI: 10.1086/209413.
100.
TodeschiniBVCortimigliaMNCallegaro-de-MenezesD, et al. (2017) Innovative and sustainable business models in the fashion industry: entrepreneurial drivers, opportunities, and challenges. Business Horizons60: 759–770. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.003.
101.
TrontoJ (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. London, UK: Routledge.
102.
TrontoJ (2005) Care as the work of citizens: a modest proposal. In: FriedmanM (ed) Women and Citizenship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
103.
VareyRJ (2010) Marketing means and ends for a sustainable society: a welfare agenda for transformative change. Journal of Macromarketing30(2): 112–126. DOI: 10.1177/0276146710361931.
104.
VetterA (2018) The matrix of convivial technology: assessing technologies for degrowth. Journal of Cleaner Production197: 1778–1786. DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.02.195.
105.
VicdanHUlusoyETillotsonJS, et al. (2023) Food prosumption technologies: a symbiotic lens for a degrowth transition. Marketing Theory24(2): 289–309. DOI: 10.1177/14705931231199962.
106.
WallendorfMBelkRW (1989) Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In: HirschmanEC (ed). Interpretive Consumer Research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 69–84.
WilsonM (2016) When creative consumers go green: understanding consumer upcycling. The Journal of Product and Brand Management25(4): 394–399. DOI: 10.1108/JPBM-09-2015-0972.
