Designing and Assessing Online Learning in English Literary Studies

Abstract

This article offers an account of online experimentation and innovation that has taken place in the English department of the University of Wolverhampton from 2003 to 2005. Focusing on an introductory first-year module and two third-year modules, it explores how and to what extent a virtual learning environment (VLE) can enhance the teaching of English literary studies in higher education. Using a ‘blended learning’ model of English teaching, in which face-to-face and online teaching are integrated, the study examines how VLEs can be incorporated into a coordinated assessment regime within individual modules, and considers the strategies for implementing VLE assessment in a staged progression across an English programme. The authors argue that online activities need to be both integrated into English courses and assessed.When balanced properly, VLE work offers no ‘easy option’ for students but effectively complements more traditional forms of assessment in English, such as essays and exams.

Keywords

assessment blended learning discussion forum English studies virtual learning environment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ARIES (2002) Available at www.arts.gla.ac.uk/SESLL/STELLA/ARIES (accessed September 2006).

Birkerts, S. (1994) The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age. London: Faber and Faber .

Blakearchive.org (2006) The William Blake Archive. Ed. Morris Eaves , Robert N. Essick and Joseph Viscomi . Available at www.blakearchive.org (accessed September 2006).

Brown, S. , Race, P. and Bull, J. (1999) Computer-Assisted Assessment in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page .

Garrison, D. R. and Anderson, T. (2003) E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. London: Routledge Falmer .

Goodfellow, R. (2001) ‘“Credit Where it is Due”: Assessing Students’ Contributions to Collaborative Online Learning’, in D. Murphy , R. Walker and G. Webb (eds) Online Learning and Teaching with Technology: Case Studies, Experience and Practice, pp. 73-80. London: Kogan Page .

Goodfellow, R. and Lea, M. R. (2005) ‘Supporting Writing for Assessment in Online Learning’ . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30(3): 261-271 .

Hanrahan, M. (2002) English and IT. London: English Subject Centre , Report No. 5.

Holland, S. (2002) ‘Communicating about Assessment’ . Version of the introductory paper presented at the Exeter Symposium, Assessment: Tradition and Innovation, 20 April 2002. Available at www.english.heacademy.ac.uk/archive/publications/casestudies/practising.pdf (accessed 21 June 2004).

10.

Holland, S. and Arrowsmith, A. (2000) Practising Theory Online. Newcastle: University of Northumbria . Available at www.english.heacademy.ac.uk/archive/publications/casestudies/practising.pdf (accessed 21 June 2004).

11.

LaGrandeur, K. (1996) ‘Using Electronic Discussion to Teach Literary Analysis’ . Computers and Texts 12-12 . Available at http://users.ox.ac.uk/%7Ectitext2/publish/comtxt/ct12/lagrand.html (accessed 21 June 2004).

12.

Laurillard, D. (2002) Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies (second edition). London: Routledge Falmer .

13.

Literature Online (1996-2006) LION . Available at http://lion.chadwyck.com (accessed September 2006).

14.

Macdonald, J. (2004) ‘Developing Competent E-Learners: The Role of Assessment’ . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29(2): 215-226 .

15.

McGann, J. (2001) Radiant Textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web. Basingstoke: Macmillan .

16.

McGann, J. with Drucker, J. and Nowviskie, B. (2005) ‘IVANHOE: Education in a New Key’ , Romantic Pedagogy Commons, Special Issue on Innovations. Available at www.rc.umd.edu/pedagogies/commons/innovations/IVANHOE.html (accessed 1 June 2005).

17.

Mandell, L. (2005) ‘Educational Theory, Web Interactivity, and Romanticism’ , Romantic Pedagogy Commons, Special Issue on Innovations. Available at www.rc.umd.edu/pedagogies/commons/innovations/introprint.htm (accessed 23 May 2005).

18.

Miles, R. (2004) ‘The Fin de Siècle Online Experience: An Experiment Using WOLF in English Literary Studies’, unpublished essay, University of Wolver-hampton .

19.

Mitchell, S. (1999) ‘Revolution in the Garden: English Literature in the Information Age’, in S. Avery , C. Bryan and G. Wisker (eds) Innovations in Teaching English and Textual Studies, pp. 123-129. Birmingham: SEDA .

20.

O’Reilly, M. and Newton, D. (2002) ‘Interaction Online: Above and Beyond the Requirements of Assessment’ . Australian Journal of Educational Technology 18(1): 57-70 . Available at www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet18/oreilly.html (accessed 16 July 2004).

21.

OED online (2006) Oxford English Dictionary Online. Available at www.oed.com (accessed September 2006).

22.

Pavey, J. and Garland, S. (2004) ‘The Integration and Implementation of a Range of ‘E-tivities’ to Enhance Students’ Interaction and Learning’ . Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41(3): 305-315 .

23.

QAA (2000) English Benchmark Statement. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education .

24.

Race, P. (1999) ‘Why Assess Innovatively?’ in S. Brown and A. Glasner (eds) Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches, pp. 57-70. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press .

25.

Sutherland, S. (2003) ‘Assessing Online Collaborative Activity on the Warwick MBA by Distance Learning’ . Interactions 7(2). Available at www.warwick.ac.uk/ETS/interactions/vol7no2/sutherland.htm (accessed 27 July 2004).