What can the aspirational humanities teach us?

Abstract

This paper focuses on the aspirational stance of varieties such as environmental and urban humanities to better understand the opportunities and risks associated with the humanities reaching outward, especially in the context of so-called societal challenges, wicked problems, and missions. The analysis takes a genealogical and discourse-centered approach, considering individual epistemic traditions alongside shared patterns in relation to how these fields have been negotiated and developed, to bring forth tensions useful for considering the how of engaging humanistic knowledge to collaboratively respond to challenges and problems, not only through individual projects or even fields, but in terms of capacity building.

Keywords

new humanities aspiration societal challenges contact zones capacity building

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Reisman

(2019) Beyond sparking joy: a Call for a critical medical humanities. Academic Medicine 94(10): 1404. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002871

Adamson

(2016) Networking networks and constellating new practices in the environmental humanities. PMLA 131(2): 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2016.131.2.347

Adelman

(2018) The sustainable development goals, anthropocentrism and neoliberalism. In: French

Kotzé

(eds) Sustainable Development Goals: Law, Theory and Implementation. Edward Elgar, pp. 15–40.

American Council of Learned Societies (2006) Our Cultural Commonwealth: The Report of the American Council of Learned Societies Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences. American Council of Learned Societies.

Arizona State University (2022) Introducing Jeanelle Austin, ASU’s inaugural activist-in-residence. Available at: https://news.asu.edu/20220104-introducing-jeanealle-austin-asus-inaugural-activist-residence (accessed 5 September 2022).

Arora-Jonsson

(2023) The sustainable development goals: a universalist promise for the future. Futures 146: 103087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103087

Atkinson

Evans

Woods

, et al. (2015) The medical’ and ‘health’ in a critical medical humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities 36: 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-014-9314-4

Bell

Dourish

(2007) Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11(2): 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0071-x

Benjamin

(2024) Imagination: A Manifesto. W. W. Norton & Company.

10.

Benneworth

(2015) Tracing how arts and humanities research translates, circulates and consolidates in society. How have scholars been reacting to diverse impact and public value agendas? Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 14(1): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214533888

11.

Bergthaller

Emmett

Johns-Putra

, et al. (2014) Mapping common ground: ecocriticism, environmental history, and the environmental humanities. Environmental Humanities 5(1): 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615505

12.

Bhattacharyya

(2022) Epistemically produced invisibility. In: Fiormonte

Chaudhuri

Ricaurte

(eds) Global Debates in the Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–14.

13.

Bod

(2023) How diverse is the history of the humanities and does it matter? History of Humanities 8(2): 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1086/726362

14.

Braidotti

(2019) A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society 36(6): 31–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486

15.

Castree

(2014) The anthropocene and the environmental humanities: extending the conversation. Environmental Humanities 5(1): 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615496

16.

Castree

(2021) Making the environmental humanities consequential in “the age of consequences”: the potential of global environmental assessments. Environmental Humanities 13(2): 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9320233

17.

Castricano

(ed) (2008) Animal Subjects: An Ethical Reader in a Posthuman World. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

18.

Chang

(2021) Pitching the “big tent” outside: an argument for the digital environmental humanities. In: Kim

Koh

(eds) Alternative Historiographies of the Digital Humanities. Punctum Books, pp. 377–397.

19.

Christensen

Morsing

Thyssen

(2013) CSR as aspirational talk. Organization 20(3): 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413478310

20.

Crawford

(2020) Introduction: global health humanities and the rise of creative public health. In: Crawford

Brown

Charise

(eds) The Routledge Companion to Health Humanities. Routledge, pp. 1–7.

21.

Cuff

Loukaitou-Sideris

Presner

, et al. (2020) Urban Humanities: New Practices for Reimagining the City. MIT Press.

22.

Denecke

(2021) Comparative global humanities now. Journal of World Literature 6(4): 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1163/24056480-20210004

23.

Digital Humanities Quarterly (2023) About DHQ. Available at: https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/about/about.html (accessed 19 October 2023).

24.

Domanska

(2015) Ecological humanities. Teksty Drugie 1(7): 186–210. https://doi.org/10.18318/td.2015.en.1.12

25.

Driver

Cornish

Nesbitt

(2022) Plant Humanities: Where Arts, Humanities & Plants Meet. Where Next? Development Programme Final Report to UKRI. Royal Holloway, University of London.

26.

Eckersley

(1998) The death of nature and the birth of the ecological humanities. Organization & Environment 11(2): 183–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921810698112004

27.

Ekström

(2016) A failed response? The humanities in transition. Academic Quarter 13: 5–15.

28.

Ekström

Sörlin

(2022) The integrative humanities – and the third research policy regime. In: Benner

Marklund

Schwaag Serger

(eds) Smart Policies for Societies in Transition: The Innovation Challenge of Inclusion, Resilience and Sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 189–212.

29.

European Commission (2009) New Societal Challenges for the European Union. New Challenges for Social Sciences and the Humanities. EUR 24178 EN.

30.

European Science Foundation and European Cooperation in Science and Technology (2011) Responses to environmental and societal challenges for our unstable earth (RESCUE). In: ESF Forward Look – ESF-COST ‘Frontier of Science’ Joint Initiative. Strasbourg and Brussels.

31.

Ferris

(2019) The new humanities? HumanitiesFutures. Franklin Humanities Institute, Available at: https://humanitiesfutures.org/papers/the-new-humanities/ (accessed 11 August 2023).

32.

Fiormonte

Chaudhuri

Ricaurte

(eds) (2022) Global Debates in the Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press.

33.

Fitzgerald

Callard

(2016) Entangling the medical humanities. In: Whitehead

Woods

Atkinson

, et al. (eds) The Edinburgh Companion to the Critical Medical Humanities. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 35–49.

34.

Gold

Klein

(2023) Introduction: the digital humanities, moment to moment. In: Gold

Klein

(eds). Debates in the Digital Humanities 2023. University of Minnesota Press.

35.

Goldberg

(2014) The Afterlife of the Humanities. University of California Humanities Research Institute. Available at: https://issuu.com/uchri/docs/afterlife/

36.

Goldberg

Means

(2024) Beyond a world of dread: a conversation with David Theo Goldberg. The Review of Education, Pedagogy & Cultural Studies, Epub ahead of print 2024.

37.

Graef

O de

(2016) Muscular Humanities. ECHIC Conference, Humanities now. Global Encounters (University of Macerata).

38.

Hallonsten

(2020) Research infrastructures in Europe: the hype and the field. European Review 28(4): 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1062798720000095

39.

Hamilton

Neimanis

(2018) Composting feminisms and environmental humanities. Environmental Humanities 10(2): 501–527. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-7156859

40.

Hammar

Östling

(2021) Introduction: the circulation of knowledge and the history of humanities. History of Humanities 6(2): 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1086/715941

41.

Härting

Meek

(eds) (2024) Planetary Health Humanities and Pandemics. Routledge.

42.

Hartman

(2020) Into the fray: a call for policy-engaged and actionable environmental humanities. Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment 11(2): 187–199. https://doi.org/10.37536/ecozona.2020.11.2.3547

43.

Hartman

Oppermann

Armiero

(2024) The environmental humanities: European perspectives on how the field is addressing twenty-first-century global challenges. In: Braidotti

Casper-Hehne

Ivković

, et al. (eds) The Edinburgh Companion to the New European Humanities. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 303–327.

44.

Hazelkorn

Nye

Benfield

(2022) Report of The Seed Box Ex-Post Evaluation 2022. 29 August. Available at: https://mistra.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/The-Seed-Box-Ex-Post-Evaluation-Report.pdf

45.

Heise

(2017) Introduction: planet, species, justice—and the stories we tell about them. In: Heise

Christensen

Niemann

(eds) The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. Routledge, pp. 1–10.

46.

Hendren

(2020) What Can a Body Do? How We Meet the Built World. Riverhead Books.

47.

Henningsson

(2025) Så stärker vi professionsutbildningarna med humaniora. In: Rapport Från Ett Symposium. KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Available at: https://www.kth.se/sv/ehl/ehl-events/news-ehl/sa-starker-vi-professionsutbildningarna-med-humaniora-rapport-fran-ett-symposium-1.1382428 (accessed 26 March 2025).

48.

Irani

(2018) “Design thinking”: defending Silicon Valley at the apex of global labor hierarchies. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 4(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v4i1.29638

49.

Irani

Silberman

(2013) Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical Turk. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 611–620. CHI ’13.

50.

Jeremijenko

(2016) Creative agency and the space race of the 21st century: towards a museum of natural futures. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS ’16, pp. 3–4.

51.

Jones

(2016) Roberto Busa, S. J., and the Emergence of Humanities Computing: The Priest and the Punched Cards. Routledge.

52.

Jørgensen

(2022) Isn’t all environmental humanities “environmental humanities in practice”. Environmental Humanities 14(1): 216–218. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9481561

53.

Juul Søndergaard

(2020) Troubling design: a design program for designing with women’s health. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27(4): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397199

54.

Kaldewey

(2018) The grand challenges discourse: transforming identity work in science and science policy. Minerva 56: 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9332-2

55.

Kitch

(2000) Higher Ground: From Utopianism to Realism in American Feminist Thought and Theory. The University of Chicago Press.

56.

Kitch

(2018) Experimental humanities and humanities for the environment. Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities 5(2): 21–35. https://doi.org/10.5250/resilience.5.2.0021

57.

Kitch

(2023) Forged in fire: constructing women’s sudies knowledge for social engagement, 1979-2019. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 48(3): 741–786. https://doi.org/10.1086/723391

58.

KTH, NIES and Uppsala University (2011) The environmental humanities: cultural perspectives on nature and the environment (an international research symposium). Available at: https://www.kth.se/philhist/historia/forskning/tidigare-forskningsprojekt/nies2/2.32499/the-environmental-humanities-cultural-perspectives-on-nature-and-the-environment-1.183094 (accessed 8 October 2023).

59.

Ludwig

Blok

Garnier

, et al. (2022) What’s wrong with global challenges? Journal of Responsible Innovation 9(1): 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.2000130

60.

Lundaprofessorn (2013) Utlysning. In: Lundaprofessorn. Available at: https://lundaprofessorn.blogspot.com/2013/10/utlysning.html (accessed 6 July 2024).

61.

Macneill

(2011) The arts and medicine: a challenging relationship. Medical Humanities 37(2): 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2011-010044

62.

Manchester University Press (2022) Ice humanities (publisher’s book website). Available at: https://manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk/9781526157775/ (accessed 24 July 2022).

63.

McAlpine

Gibson

Bengtsen

SSE

, et al. (2024) Valuing humanities: rethinking the humanities-impact landscape in Denmark. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 23(4): 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222241261034

64.

Mintrom

Luetjens

(2016) Design thinking in policymaking processes: opportunities and challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration 75(3): 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12211

65.

Mistra (2013) Environmental humanities. Available at: https://mistra.org/utlysningar/environmental-humanities/ (accessed 15 November 2024).

66.

Neimanis

Åsberg

Hedrén

(2015) Four problems, four directions for environmental humanities: toward critical posthumanities for the anthropocene. Ethics and the Environment 20(1): 67–97. https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.20.1.67

67.

Nocek

(2024) Redesigning design: on pluralizing design. In: Rodgers

Yee

(eds) The Routledge Companion to Design Research. 2nd edition. Routledge, pp. 52–63.

68.

Nowviskie

(2015) Digital humanities in the anthropocene. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30(suppl_1): i4–i15. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv015

69.

Nye

Rugg

Fleming

, et al. (2013) The Emergence of the Environmental Humanities. Mistra. Available at: https://ecologicalhumanities.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/mistra_environmental_humanities_may2013.pdf

70.

Nyhan

(2022) Hidden and Devalued Feminized Labour in the Digital Humanities: On the Index Thomisticus Project 1954-67. Routledge.

71.

Oiva

Pawlicka-Deger

(2020) Lab and slack. Situated research practices in digital humanities - introduction to the DHQ special issue. Digital Humanities Quarterly 14(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.63744/76e7bfv525xq

72.

Oppermann

(2023) Blue Humanities: Storied Waterscapes in the Anthropocene. Cambridge University Press.

73.

Östling

Heidenblad

Sandmo

, et al. (2018) The history of knowledge and the circulation of knowledge: an introduction. In: Östling

Sandmo

Heidenblad

, et al. (eds) Circulation of Knowledge: Explorations in the History of Knowledge. Nordic Academic Press, pp. 9–33.

74.

O’Gorman

van Dooren

Münster

, et al. (2019) Teaching the environmental humanities: international perspectives and practices. Environmental Humanities 11(2): 427–460. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-7754545

75.

Pasek

(2020) Low-carbon research: building a greener and more inclusive academy. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 6(0): 34–38. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.363

76.

Pedersen

Grønvad

Hvidtfeldt

(2020) Methods for mapping the impact of social sciences and humanities—a literature review. Research Evaluation 29(1): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz033

77.

Posthumus

Sinclair

(2017) Digital? Environmental: humanities. In: Heise

Christensen

Niemann

(eds) The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. Routledge, pp. 369–377.

78.

Pratt

(1991) Arts of the Contact Zone. Profession, 33–40.

79.

Presner

(2024) Ethics of the Algorithm: Digital Humanities and Holocaust Memory. Princeton University Press.

80.

Priebe

Mårald

Nordin

(2021) Narrow pasts and futures: how frames of sustainability transformation limit societal change. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 11: 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-020-00636-3

81.

Ratto

(2011) Critical making: conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. The Information Society 27(4): 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819

82.

Ratto

Jackson

(2023) Reopening, repetition and resetting: HCI and the method of hope. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7(CSCW2): 356:1–356:30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3610205

83.

Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities (2023). Overview, Available at: https://www.resiliencejournal.org/about/overview/ (accessed 10 October 2023).

84.

Reviews in Digital Humanities (2023) About Reviews in Digital Humanities. Reviews in Digital Humanities. Available at: https://reviewsindh.pubpub.org/about (accessed 26 October 2023).

85.

Rider

(2019) Review of Circulation of knowledge: explorations in the history of knowledge. Historisk Tidskrift 139(2): 367–370.

86.

Rigby

(2019) Weaving the environmental humanities: Australian strands, configurations, and provocations. Green Letters 23(1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14688417.2019.1578250

87.

Risam

(2019) New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis, and Pedagogy. Northwestern University Press.

88.

Risam

(2025) Public humanities before public humanities. Public Humanities 1(e34): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/pub.2024.45

89.

Risam

Gil

(2022) Introduction: the questions of minimal computing. Digital Humanities Quarterly 16(2): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.63744/b49fzhuz9hhz

90.

Robin

Rose

(2001) A Manifesto for the Ecological Humanities. The Australian National University. Available at: https://fennerschool-associated.anu.edu.au/ecologicalhumanities/manifesto.php (accessed 5 October 2023).

91.

Rose

Robin

(2004) The ecological humanities in action: an invitation. Australian Humanities Review.

92.

Rose

von Dooren

(2012) Introduction and farewell. Australian Humanities Review (52): 137–138.

93.

Rose

van Dooren

Chrulew

, et al. (2012) Thinking through the environment, unsettling the humanities. Environmental Humanities 1(1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3609940

94.

Ryan

Hearn

Arthur

(2023) The digital environmental humanities (DEH) in the anthropocene: challenges and opportunities in an era of ecological precarity. Digital Humanities Quarterly 17(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.63744/ss9hp76ew4d4

95.

Sayers

(ed) (2018) Making Things and Drawing Boundaries: Experiments in the Digital Humanities. University Of Minnesota Press.

96.

Schreibman

Siemens

Unsworth

(2004) A Companion to Digital Humanities. Blackwell.

97.

Science|Business (2009) Lund Declaration: let grand challenges drive EU research. Science|Business.

98.

Sha

(2011) The atelier-lab as a transversal machine. Revue Française d'Études Américaines 128(2): 62–78.

99.

Small

(2023) “Wicked problems”: humanities advocacy’s need for history of humanities. History of Humanities 8(2): 229–237. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/726366

100.

Smith

(2007) The human touch software of the highest order: revisiting editing as interpretation. Textual Cultures: Texts, Contexts, Interpretation 2(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2979/tex.2007.2.1.1

101.

Södertörn University (2020) Development plan 2020-2024. Available at: https://www.sh.se/english/sodertorn-university/meet-sodertorn-university/strategies/development-plan-2020-2024 (accessed 12 June 2024).

102.

Sörlin

(2016) Grön humaniora – vad, när, varför och varthän? Kulturella perspektiv - Svensk etnologisk tidskrift 25(1): 8–19. https://doi.org/10.54807/kp.v25.18349

103.

Sörlin

(2018) Humanities of transformation: from crisis and critique towards the emerging integrative humanities. Research Evaluation 27(4): 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx030

104.

Stanford University. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (2024) About. Available at: https://hai.stanford.edu/about (accessed 20 June 2024).

105.

Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities (2024) Om fakulteten. Available at: https://www.su.se/om-universitetet/organisation/fakulteter/humanistiska-fakulteten/om-fakulteten (accessed 12 June 2024).

106.

Svensson

(2012) The digital humanities as a humanities project. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11(1–2): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022211427367

107.

Svensson

(2016) Big Digital Humanities: Imagining a Meeting Place for the Humanities and the Digital. University of Michigan Press.

108.

Svensson

(ed) (2021) Humane Infrastructures Conversation #1: Inside and Outside: Shifting socio-technological Systems. Available at: https://patriksv.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Humane-Infrastructures-Conversation-1-Inside-and-Outside.pdf

109.

Svensson

(2025) Humane Infrastructures. MIT Press.

110.

Swedish Council for Higher Education (2023) Allt du behöver veta om dina studier (studera.nu). Available at: https://www.studera.nu/ (accessed 23 October 2023).

111.

Swedish Research Council (2019) Research Overview 2019: Humanities and Social Sciences. VR1901.

112.

Szeman

Boyer

(2017) Introduction: on the energy humanities. In: Szeman

Boyer

(eds) Energy Humanities: An Anthology. John Hopkins University Press, pp. 1–13.

113.

The European Association for Digital Humanities (2026) About | EADH. Available at: https://eadh.org/about (accessed 2 February 2026).

114.

Tola

(2022) Intersectionality and the environmental humanities: notes on elisions and encounters. About Gender - International Journal of Gender Studies 11(22): 1–27.

115.

Travis

Dixon

Bergmann

, et al. (eds) (2022) Routledge Handbook of the Digital Environmental Humanities. Routledge.

116.

Ulčák

(2003) Landscape in the teaching of environmental humanities. Ekológia 22(Suppl. 2): 386–388.

117.

Umeå University (2024) Vill du påverka hur AI formar samhället? Facebook post.

118.

UNESCO-MOST BRIDGES (2024) The objectives, principles and aims of BRIDGES. Available at: https://bridges.earth/about (accessed 18 June 2024).

119.

UNESCO-MOST BRIDGES (2025) Events: upcoming and past. Available at: https://bridges.earth/events/:eventPage? (accessed 21 January 2025).

120.

University of Oxford (2024) Discovering what it is to be human in a complex world. Humanities Division. Available at: https://www.humanities.ox.ac.uk/home (accessed 4 June 2024).

121.

Uppsala University (2023) Humanioraprogrammet. Available at: https://www.uu.se/utbildning/program/humanioraprogrammet (accessed 25 September 2023).

122.

Viney

Callard

Woods

(2015) Critical medical humanities: embracing entanglement, taking risks. Medical Humanities 41(1): 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2015-010692

123.

Vogt

Weber

(2019) Current challenges to the concept of sustainability. Global Sustainability 2(e4): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2019.1

124.

Vrikki

Tavmen

(2025) Rewiring digital humanities through an ethics of ecological care. Digital Humanities Quarterly 19(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.63744/4vgsqt5r2y4g

125.

Waterston

(2020) Imagining world solidarities for a livable future. Kritisk etnografi: Swedish Journal of Anthropology 3(1): 33–42. https://doi.org/10.33063/diva-419425

126.

Widgren

(2014) Uppskjutet FORMAS-MISTRA-beslut. In: Mats Widgren. Available at: https://widgren.blogspot.com/2014/04/uppskjutet-formas-mistra-beslut.html (accessed 6 July 2024).

127.

Yergeau

(2014) Disability hacktivism. In: Sayers

Hocks

(eds) Hacking the Classroom: Eight Perspectives. Computers and Composition Online. Available at: https://cconlinejournal.org/hacking/ (accessed 7 June 2021).