Auditing values in diabetes care can potentially give the wrong impression. Using a single value such as percentage of patients with a blood pressure ≥ 140/80 mmHg does not reflect what is happening in the practice as a whole. There is a risk that patients who will never achieve such targets will be viewed with less enthusiasm than they should by their primary care team members. This article describes a simple method of auditing diabetes values that includes all diabetes patients and is helpful when comparing year on year progress.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
UKPDS: Tight Blood Pressure Control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in Type 2 diabetes. UKPDS 38. BMJ1998;317:703-26.
2.
Ukpds.Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet1998;352:837-53.
3.
Ukpds.Effect of intensive blood glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet1998;352:854-65.
4.
Hansson L., Zanchetti A., Carruthers SG et al. for the HOT study group.Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering and low dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimisation (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet1998;351: 1755-62.
5.
Concise Oxford Dictionary10th edition. Oxford University Press, 1999.
6.
Ramsey LE, William B., Johnston GD et al. Guidelines for the management of hypertension: report of the third working party of the British Hypertension Society. J Human Hypertension1999;13:569-92.
7.
Winocour P.Effective diabetes care: a need for realistic targets. BMJ2002;324:1577-80.
8.
Goddard M., Smith PCHealth Policy Matters, University of York: Issue 3, January 2001.