Grit and Self-Identity: A Contextual Inquiry Into Academic Performance

Abstract

Research suggests that noncognitive factors are valuable constructs to further understand student performance in higher education. Grit is one such noncognitive factor to garner significant attention, but questions remain regarding its practical utilization. This study furthers the understanding of how grit can be leveraged in such environments in two key ways. First, it compares the model fit of global and school-specific grit assessments. Grit is typically evaluated as a global, rather than domain-specific, construct; this is based on an unexplored assumption that grit does not vary as a function of context. Second, it explores the extent to which student self-conceptualizations within and outside of the classroom facilitate the relationship between grit and academic performance. Implications of this research provide insight regarding the validity of measuring grit in higher education, as well as explore a novel framework to underpin the development of future institutional-level interventions.

Keywords

grit measurement domain-specificity personality higher education self-concept self-identity academic performance noncognitive factors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akos

Greene

J. A.

Fotheringham

Raynor

Gonzales

Godwin

(2022). The promise of noncognitive factors for underrepresented college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 24(2), 575–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025120935111

Akos

Kretchmar

(2017). Investigating grit at a non-cognitive predictor of college success. The Review of Higher Education, 40(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1353/rhe.2017.0000

Almeida

D. J.

Byrne

A. M.

Smith

R. M.

Ruiz

(2021). How relevant is grit? The importance of social capital in first-generation college students’ academic success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(3), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119854688

Bing

M. N.

Whanger

J. C.

Davison

H. K.

VanHook

J. B.

(2004). Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores: A replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 150. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.150

Blanden

Gregg

Macmillan

(2007). Accounting for intergenerational income persistence: Noncognitive skills, ability and education. The Economic Journal, 117(519), C43–C60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02034.x

Bowman

N. A.

Hill

P. L.

Denson

Bronkema

(2015). Keep on truckin’ or stay the course? Exploring grit dimensions as differential predictors of educational achievement, satisfaction, and intentions. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(6), 639–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615574300

Bowman

N. A.

Miller

Woosley

Maxwell

N. P.

Kolze

M. J.

(2019). Understanding the link between non-cognitive attributes and college retention. Research in Higher Education, 60(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9508-0

Boyle

G. J.

Stankov

Martin

N. G.

Petrides

K. V.

Eysenck

M. W.

Ortet

(2016). Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell on intelligence and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.029

Carlson

K. D.

(2012). The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111428817

10.

Cheng

C. Y.

Sanchez-Burks

Lee

(2008). Connecting the dots within: Creative performance and identity integration. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02220.x

11.

Clark

K. N.

Malecki

C. K.

(2019). Academic Grit Scale: Psychometric properties and associations with achievement and life satisfaction. Journal of School Psychology, 72, 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.001

12.

Cohen

G. L.

Garcia

Apfel

Master

(2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313(5791), 1307–1310. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1126/science.1128317

13.

Cormier

D. L.

Dunn

J. G.

Dunn

J. C.

(2019). Examining the domain specificity of grit. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.026

14.

Credé

Tynan

M. C.

Harms

P. D.

(2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 492. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1037/pspp0000102

15.

Donahue

E. M.

Robins

R. W.

Roberts

B. W.

John

O. P.

(1993). The divided self: Concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 834–846. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.834

16.

Duckworth

A. L.

Kirby

T. A.

Tsukayama

Berstein

Ericsson

K. A.

(2011). Deliberate practice spells success: Why grittier competitors triumph at the National Spelling Bee. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 174–181. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1177/1948550610385872

17.

Duckworth

A. L.

Peterson

Matthews

M. D.

Kelly

D. R.

(2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087

18.

Duckworth

A. L.

Quinn

P. D.

(2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (GRIT-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1080/00223890802634290

19.

Duckworth

A. L.

Yeager

D. S.

(2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.3102/0013189X15584327

20.

Eskreis-Winkler

Duckworth

A. L.

Shulman

E. P.

Beal

(2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00036

21.

Farruggia

S. P.

Han

Watson

Moss

T. P.

Bottoms

B. L.

(2018). Noncognitive factors and college student success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 20(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116666539

22.

Fosnacht

Copridge

Sarraf

S. A.

(2019). How valid is grit in the postsecondary context? A construct and concurrent validity analysis. Research in Higher Education, 60(6), 803–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9524-0

23.

Garcia

(2016). The need to address non-cognitive skills in the education policy agenda. In Non-cognitive skills and factors in educational attainment (pp. 31–64). Brill Sense.

24.

Gecas

(1989). The social psychology of self-efficacy. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 291–316. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.001451

25.

Helms

J. E.

(2006). Fairness is not validity or cultural bias in racial-group assessment: A quantitative perspective. American Psychologist, 61(8), 845–859. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.845

26.

Helms

J. E.

(2012). A legacy of eugenics underlies racial-group comparisons in intelligence testing. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 176–179. https://doi.org/https://https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01426.x

27.

Hirsh

J. B.

Kang

S. K.

(2016). Mechanisms of identity conflict: Uncertainty, anxiety, and the behavioral inhibition system. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 223–244. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1177/1088868315589475

28.

Hochanadel

Finamore

(2015). Fixed and growth mindset in education and how grit helps students persist in the face of adversity. Journal of International Education Research, 11(1), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v11i1.9099

29.

Hodge

Wright

Bennett

(2018). The role of grit in determining engagement and academic outcomes for university students. Research in Higher Education, 59(4), 448–460. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1007/s11162-017-9474-y

30.

Hughes

(2022). Validating students’ diverse identities. Exploring How We Teach. Paper 9. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/howweteach/9.

31.

Jastrzębski

Kroczek

Chuderski

(2021). Galton and Spearman revisited: Can single general discrimination ability drive performance on diverse sensorimotor tasks and explain intelligence? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(7), 1279–1302. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1037/xge0001005

32.

Kannangara

C. S.

Allen

R. E.

Waugh

Nahar

Khan

S. Z. N.

Rogerson

Carson

(2018). All that glitters is not grit: Three studies of grit in university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1539. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01539

33.

Kebritchi

Rominger

McCaslin

(2025). Contributing factors for success of nontraditional students at online doctoral programs. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 27(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251231155488

34.

Kelly

D. R.

Matthews

M. D.

Bartone

P. T.

(2014). Grit and hardiness as predictors of performance among West Point cadets. Military Psychology, 26(4), 327–342. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1037/mil0000050

35.

Larkin

O’Connor

Williams

A. M.

(2016). Does grit influence sport-specific engagement and perceptual-cognitive expertise in elite youth soccer? Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 28(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1080/10413200.2015.1085922

36.

Levine

(2017). Eugenics: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199385904.001.0001.

37.

Lievens

Conway

J. M.

(2001). Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: A large-scale evaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1202. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1202

38.

Lievens

De Corte

Schollaert

(2008). A closer look at the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores and validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.268

39.

Manzi

Koc

Benet-Martínez

Reverberi

(2021). Identity integration matters: The case of parents working from home during the COVID-19 health emergency. Self and Identity, 21(8), 914–938. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1080/15298868.2021.2004217

40.

Marsh

H. W.

Martin

A. J.

(2011). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Relations and causal ordering. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X503501

41.

McConnell

A. R.

(2011). The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310371101

42.

McConnell

A. R.

Rydell

R. J.

Brown

C. M.

(2009a). On the experience of self-relevant feedback: How self-concept organization influences affective responses and self-evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.011

43.

McConnell

A. R.

Shoda

T. M.

Skulborstad

H. M.

(2012). The self as a collection of multiple self-aspects: Structure, development, operation, and implications. Social Cognition, 30(4), 380–395. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.4.380

44.

McConnell

A. R.

Strain

L. M.

Brown

C. M.

Rydell

R. J.

(2009b). The simple life: On the benefits of low self-complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(7), 823–835. https://doi.org/https://doi/10.1177/0146167209334785

45.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In Wiggins

J. S.

(Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. Guilford Press.

46.

Meriac

J. P.

Slifka

J. S.

LaBat

L. R.

(2015). Work ethic and grit: An examination of empirical redundancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.009

47.

Michell

(2022). The art of imposing measurement upon the mind”: Sir Francis Galton and the genesis of the psychometric paradigm. Theory & Psychology, 32(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211017671

48.

Mosewich

A. D.

Dunn

J. G.

Causgrove Dunn

Wright

K. S.

(2021). Domain-specific grit, identity, and self-compassion in intercollegiate athletes. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 10(2), 257. https://doi.org/https:///doi/10.1037/spy0000267

49.

Mueller

B. A.

Wolfe

M. T.

Syed

(2017). Passion and grit: An exploration of the pathways leading to venture success. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.02.001

50.

O'Reilly

C. A.

Chatman

Caldwell

D. F.

(1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.2307/256404

51.

Patterson Silver Wolf

D. A.

Taylor

Maguin

Asher BlackDeer

(2021). You are college material—You belong: An underrepresented minority student retention intervention without deception. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(3), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025119848749

52.

Roberts

B. W.

Kuncel

N. R.

Shiner

Caspi

Goldberg

L. R.

(2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x

53.

Robie

Schmit

M. J.

Ryan

A. M.

Zickar

M. J.

(2000). Effects of item context specificity on the measurement equivalence of a personality inventory. Organizational Research Methods, 3(4), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810034003

54.

Schmidt

F. T.

Fleckenstein

Retelsdorf

Eskreis-Winkler

Möller

(2017). Measuring grit: A German validation and a domain-specific approach to grit. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000407

55.

Schmit

M. J.

Ryan

A. M.

Stierwalt

S. L.

Powell

A. B.

(1995). Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(5), 607. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.607

56.

Sheldon

K. M.

Jose

P. E.

Kashdan

T. B.

Jarden

(2015). Personality, effective goal-striving, and enhanced well-being: Comparing 10 candidate personality strengths. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215573211

57.

Showers

(1992). Compartmentalization of positive and negative self-knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1036–1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1036

58.

Spearman

(1961). ‘General intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/11491-006

59.

Stipek

D. J.

Weisz

J. R.

(1981). Perceived personal control and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 101–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170252

60.

van Zyl

L. E.

van Vuuren

H. A.

Roll

L. C.

Stander

M. W.

(2023). Person-environment fit and task performance: exploring the role(s) of grit as a personal resource. Current Psychology, 42, 23560–23579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03461-9

61.

Wirthwein

Sparfeldt

J. R.

Pinquart

Wegerer

Steinmayr

(2013). Achievement goals and academic achievement: A closer look at moderating factors. Educational Research Review, 10, 66–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.07.001

62.

Wright

J. C.

Mischel

(1987). A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: The local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1159

63.

Yakushko

(2019). Eugenics and its evolution in the history of Western psychology: A critical archival review. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 17(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.1495

64.

Zwick

Green

J. G.

(2007). New perspectives on the correlation of SAT scores, high school grades, and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2007.00025.x