In Europe, living kidney donation rates differ considerably from country to country. These differences are related to deceased kidney donation rates: countries with higher deceased donation rates have lower living donation rates. Despite the differences, all countries have one thing in common, namely, the shortage of kidneys for transplantation. Living kidney donation is a good option to alleviate these shortages. In our center, 60% to 70% of all kidney transplants come from living donors. This article describes various strategies that may have contributed to these high living donation rates: team attitude, educational materials and meetings, and alternative donation programs (exchange donation, domino-paired donation, Good Samaritan donation). Also described are some less conventional strategies for increasing rate of living kidney donation that are not used in the Netherlands but may offer some good perspectives (eg, the “Norwegian approach” and home-based educational programs).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SanzABoniRCGhirardiniACostNanni AManyalichM. IRODaT Transplantation and donation: 2005 preliminary figures.http://www.tpm.org. Accessed August 4, 2008.
2.
WitzkeOPietruckFPaulABroelschCEPhilippT. Crossover kidney transplantation in Germany. Dtsch Med Wochenschrg.2005;130(47):2699–2702.
3.
HartmannA. Managing a living donor programme: The Oslo experience. Presented at: Satellite symposium 11th conference of the European Society for Organ Transplantation; Venice, Italy; September 20–24, 2003.
4.
Parliament proposal on Active Donor Registration System [in Dutch].Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal, vergaderjaar 2004–2005.http://www.overheid.nl/op. Accessed August 4, 2008.
5.
AriasMde FelipeC. Transplante renal de dovante vivo: Encuesta de opinion delos nefrologos espanoles. Nefrologia.1995;15:523.
6.
KranenburgLWZuidemaWWeimarW. Postmortal or living related donor: Preferences of kidney patients [reply to Letters to the Editor]. Transplant Int.2006;19(7):600.
7.
KurtzSSilvermanJDraperJ. Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Medicine.Oxford, England: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1998.
8.
LennerlingANybergG. Written information for potential living kidney donors. Transpl Int.2004;17(8):449–452.
9.
WatermanADBarretACStanleySL. Optimal transplant education for recipients to increase pursuit of living donation. Prog Transplant.2008;18(1):55–62.
10.
ThielGVogelbachPGurkeL. Crossover renal transplantation: Hurdles to be cleared!Transplant Proc.2001;33(1–2):811–816.
11.
de KlerkMKeizerKClaasFWitvlietMHaase-KromwijkBWeimarW. The Dutch national living donor kidney exchange program. Am J Transplant.2005;5:2302–2305.
12.
KranenburgLWVisakTZuidemaW. Starting a crossover kidney transplantation program in the Netherlands: Ethical and psychological considerations. Transplantation.2004;78(2):194–197.
13.
KranenburgLWZuidemaWVanderkroftP. The implementation of a kidney exchange program does not induce a need for additional psychosocial support. Transpl Int.2007;20(5):432–439.
14.
de KlerkMWitvlietMHaase-KromwijkBClaasFWeimarW. A highly efficient living donor kidney exchange program for both blood type and crossmatch incompatible donor-recipient combinations. Transplantation.2006;82(12):1616–1620.
15.
MageeCCFelgueirasJTinckamKMalekSMahHTulliusS. Renal transplantation in patients with positive lymphocytotoxicity crossmatches: One centre's experience. Transplantation.2008;86(1):96–103.
16.
GenbergHKumlienGWennbergLTydenG. Long-term results of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation with antigen-specific immunoadsorption and rituximab. Transplantation.2007;84(12 suppl):S44–S47.
17.
JacobsCLRomanDGarveyCKahnJMatasAJ. Twenty-two non-directed donors: An update on an sngel centre's experience. Am J Transplant.2004;4:1110–1116.
18.
KranenburgLWZuidemaWErdmanRAMWeimarWPasschierJBusschbachJ. The psychological evaluation of Samaritan kidney donors: A systematic review. Psychol Med.2008;38(2):177–185.
19.
LennerlingAFehrman-EkholmINordénG. Nondirected living kidney donation: Experiences in a Swedish Transplant Centre. Clin Transplant.2008;22(3):304–308.
20.
ZuidemaWKranenburgLWErdmanRAM. Living kidney donation by good Samaritans. In: WeimarWBosMBusschbachJ, eds. Organ Transplantation: Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects. Towards a Common European Policy.Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers; 2008:306–310.
KranenburgLZuidemaWWeimarW. Psychological barriers for living kidney donation: How to inform the potential donors?Transplantation.2007;84(4):965–971.
23.
RodrigueJRCornellDLHowardRJKaplanBLinJ. Increasing live donor kidney transplantation: A randomized controlled trial of a home-based educational intervention. Am J Transplant.2007;7(2):394–401.
24.
KriescheMeier HUPortFKOjoAO. Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome. Kidney Int.2000;58(3): 1311–1317.
25.
LiemYSBoschJLArendsLRHeijenbrok-KalMHHuninkMG. Quality of life assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey of patients on renal replacement therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Value Health.2007;10(5):390–397.
AbecassisMBartlettSTCollinsAJ. Kidney transplantation as primary therapy for end-stage renal disease: A National Kidney Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQITM) conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol.2008;3(2):471–480.
28.
de BeaufortIMeulenbergF. The dangers of triage by television. BMJ.2007;334:1194–1195.
29.
MatasAJ. In defense of a regulated system of compensation for living donors. In: WeimarW.BosM.BusschbachJ. Organ Transplantation: Ethical, Legal and Psychosocial Aspects. Towards a Common European Policy.Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers; 2008:55–63.
