This article examines why Latinos are more trusting of the federal government than Anglos and Blacks. We address this puzzle by turning to previous research on racial politics and political trust. Consistent with previous research, discrimination and generational status are important predictors of Latinos’ political trust, with first-generation Latinos more trusting than later-generation Latinos. Encounters with racial discrimination also make Latinos and Blacks less trusting of government. In contrast, Anglos’ political trust can be explained by their economic evaluations as well as their partisanship. Although these findings are insightful, they do not directly address why intergroup differences arise when it comes to their trust in government. We argue that combined with generational distinctions among Latinos in their trust of government, the heavy flow of Latino immigration in the past 30 years has changed the Latino population in such a way that the views of the foreign-born are disproportionately represented in survey questions related to trust in government. This is producing a Latino population that is more inclined to trust government than Anglos or Blacks. We then examine the impact of political trust on individuals’ opinions toward redistributive policies. Political trust has a strong and positive effect on Latinos’ attitudes toward such policies.
Abramson, P. ( 1983). Political attitudes in America. San Francisco: Freeman.
2.
Alba, Richard and Victor Nee.2003. Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Almond, G., & Verba, S. ( 1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4.
Baldassare, M. ( 2004). PPIC statewide survey: Special survey on Californians and their future. Unpublished manuscript, Public Policy Institute of California. Available from www.ppic.org.
5.
Barreto, M.A., Segura, G.M., & Woods, N.D. ( 2004). The mobilizing effect of majority-minority districts on Latino turnout. The American Political Science Review, 98(1), 65-75.
6.
Bobo, L., & Gilliam, F.D., Jr. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and black empowerment. The American Political Science Review , 84(2), 377-393.
7.
Carey, K. ( 2003). The funding gap. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.
8.
Chan, S. ( 1997). Effects of attention to campaign coverage on political trust. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9, 286-296.
9.
Citrin, J. ( 1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government . American Political Science Review, 68, 973-988.
10.
Citrin, J., & Green, D.P. ( 1986). Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 431-453.
11.
Citrin, J., & Muste, C. ( 1999). Trust in government. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes (pp. 465-530). New York: Academic Press.
12.
Craig, S.C. ( 1996). The angry voter: Politics and popular discontent in the 1990s. In S. C. Craig (Ed.), Broken contract: Changing relationships between Americans and their government (pp. 87-109). Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
Dahl, R. ( 1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city . New Haven: Yale University Press .
14.
Dawson, M. ( 1994). Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
de la Garza, R., & DeSipio, L. ( 1992). From rhetoric to reality: Latino politics in the 1988 elections. Boulder, CO: Westview .
16.
Feldman, S. ( 1983). The measurement and meaning of political trust. Political Methodologist, 9, 341-354.
17.
Garcia, M.C. ( 1996). Havana USA: Cuban exiles and Cuban Americans in South Florida, 1959-1994. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
Garcia Bedolla, L. ( 2005). Fluid borders: Latino power, identity and politics inLos Angeles. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
Glazer, N., & Moynihan, D.P. (1970). Beyond the melting pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians and Irish of New York City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
Greeley, A. ( 1971). Why can’t they be like us? America’s White ethnic groups. New York: Dutton .
21.
Griffin, J.D., & Keane, M. ( 2006). Descriptive representation and the composition of AfricanAmerican turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 998-1012.
22.
Hajnal, Z.L., & Baldassare, M. (2001). Finding common ground: Racial and ethnic attitudes in California. San Francisco : Public Policy Institute of California.
23.
Hardin, R. ( 2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York : Russell Sage.
24.
Hero, R. ( 1992). Latinos and the political system: Two-tiered pluralism . Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
25.
Hetherington, M.J. ( 1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92, 791-808.
26.
Hetherington, M.J. ( 1999). The effect of political trust on the presidential vote . American Political Science Review, 93, 311-326.
27.
Hetherington, M.J. ( 2005). Why political trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28.
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. ( 2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475-507.
29.
Markus, G.B. ( 1979). The political environment and the dynamics of public attitudes: A panel study. American Journal of Political Science , 23, 338-359.
30.
Michelson, M. ( 2001). Trust in Chicago Latinos. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23, 323-334.
31.
Michelson, M. ( 2003). The corrosive effect of acculturation: How Mexican Americans lose political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 919-933.
32.
Miller, A. ( 1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68, 951-972.
33.
Pantoja, A., Ramirez, R., & Segura, G.M. ( 2001). Citizens by choice, voters by necessity: Patterns in political mobilization by naturalized Latinos. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 729-750.
34.
Parker, G.R. ( 1989). The role of constituent trust in congressional elections . Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 175-196.
35.
Patterson, T.E. ( 1994). Out of order. New York: Knopf Press.
36.
Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. ( 1996). Immigrant America: A portrait. Berkeley : University of California Press.
37.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American society . New York: Simon & Schuster .
38.
Ramakrishnan, K. ( 2005). Democracy in immigrant America. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
39.
Romer, D., Kenski, K., Winneg, K., Adasiewicz, C., & Jamieson, K.H. (2006). Capturing campaign dynamics 2000 & 2004. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
40.
Rosenstone, S.J., & Hanson, J.M. ( 1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America . New York: Macmillan.
41.
Shingles, R.D. ( 2001). Black consciousness and political participation: The missing link. American Political Science Review, 75, 76-91.
42.
Stokes, D.E. ( 1962). Popular evaluation of government: An empirical assessment . In H. Cleveland & H. D. Lasswell (Eds.), Ethics and bigness: Scientific, academic, religious, political and military (pp. 61-72). New York: Harper.
43.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2002). Available from www.census.gov
44.
Weatherford, M.S. ( 1984). Economic "stagflation" and public support for the political system. British Journal of Political Science, 14, 187-205.
45.
Williams, J.T. ( 1985). Systematic influences on political trust: The importance of perceived institutional performance. Political Methodologist , 11, 125-142.
46.
Wolfinger, R.E. ( 1974). The politics of progress. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47.
Zhou, M. ( 1999). Segmented assimilation: Issues, controversies and recent research on the new second generation. In C. Hirschman, P. Kasinitz, & J. DeWind (Eds.), The handbook of international migration: The American experience. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
