There has been significant scholarly research on judicial decision making and bureaucratic control but little research on bureaucrats who perform a judicial function, namely, administrative law judges. In this article, we analyze the influences on the decisions of administrative law judges (ALJs) from 1991 to 2006. Using ordered logit, we examine the influence of policy preference and hierarchical and political constraint. We find that ALJs are comparable to Federal District Court judges in that they use ideology in their rulings, are also subject to hierarchical control by higher courts, and that they are constrained by separation of powers influences.
Baum. L. ( 1997). The puzzle of judicial behavior. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
2.
Bawn, K. ( 1995). Political control versus expertise: Congressional choices about administrative procedures. American Political Science Review, 89(1), 62-73.
3.
Calvert, R., McCubbins, M.D., & Weingast, B.R. (1989). A theory of political control and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science , 33, 588-611.
4.
Canes-Wrone, B. ( 2003). Bureaucratic decisions and the composition of the lower courts. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 205-214.
5.
Carp, R.A., & Stidham, R. ( 1990). Judicial process in America. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
6.
Cooke, W.N., Mishra, A.K., Spreitzer, G.M., & Tschirhart, M. (1995). The determinants of NLRB decision-making revisited. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 237-257.
7.
Delorme, C.D., Jr., Hill, R.C., & Wood, N.J. ( 1981). The determinants of voting by the National Labor Relations Board on unfair labor practice cases: 1955-1975. Public Choice , 37, 207-218.
8.
Estreicher, S., & Revesz, R.L. ( 1989). Nonacquiescence by federal administrative agencies. Yale Law Journal, 98, 679-700.
9.
Epstein, L., Martin, A.D., Segal, J.A., & Westerland, C. (2007). The judicial common space. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 23, 303-325.
10.
Fischer, F.H., Garren, B., & Truesdale, J.C. (2008). How to take a case before the NLRB. Arlington, VA: BNA Books .
11.
Frye, D.R. ( 2010). Testimony before the subcommittee on social security and the subcommittee on income security and family support the house committee on ways and means, 111th Cong., 2nd session.
12.
Giles, M.W., Hettinger, V.A., & Peppers T. ( 2001). Picking federal judges: A note on policy and partisan selection agendas. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 623-641.
13.
Giles, M.W., Hettinger, V.A., & Peppers T. ( 2002). Measuring the preferences of federal judges: Alternatives to party of the appointing president. Unpublished manuscript, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
14.
Goldman, S., & Slotnick, E. ( 1997). Clinton’s first term judiciary: Many bridges to cross. Judicature, 80, 254-273.
15.
Goldman, S., & Slotnick, E. ( 1999). Clinton’s second term judiciary: Picking judges under fire. Judicature, 82, 264-285.
16.
Goldman, S., & Slotnick, E. ( 2001). Clinton’s judges: Summing up the legacy. Judicature, 84, 228-254.
17.
Goldman, S., & Slotnick, E. ( 2003). W. Bush remaking the judiciary: Like father like son ? Judicature, 86, 282-311.
18.
Goldman, S., & Slotnick, E. ( 2005). W. Bush’s judiciary: First term record. Judicature, 88, 244-275.
19.
Gormley, Jr., W.T. ( 1989). Taming the bureaucracy: Muscles, prayers, and other strategies . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Green, M.D. ( 1965). The business of the trial courts. In H. W. Jones (Ed.), The courts, the public, and the law explosion (pp. 7-34). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21.
Hamilton, A. ( 1961). Federalist 78. In C. Rossiter (Ed.), The Federalist Papers: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay (pp. 352-357). New York, NY: Mentor.
22.
Hettinger, V.A., & Lindquist, S.A. , & Martinek, W.L. (2004). Comparing attitudinal and strategic accounts of dissenting behavior on the United States courts of appeals. American Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 123-137.
23.
Howard, R.M., & Carey, H.F. ( 2004). Courts and political freedom: A measure of judicial independence . Judicature, 87, 285-290.
24.
Howard, R.M., & Nixon, D.C. ( 2002). Regional influences within a separation of powers framework: Courts, ideological preferences and IRS local policymaking. Political Research Quarterly, 55, 907-922.
25.
Howard, R.M., & Nixon, D.C. ( 2003). Local control of the bureaucracy: Federal appeals courts, ideology, and the Internal Revenue Service. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 13, 233-256.
26.
Jones, H.W. ( 1965). The trial judge-role analysis and profile. In H. W. Jones (Ed.), The courts, the public, and the law explosion (pp. 1-10). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27.
Krause, G.A. ( 1996). The institutional dynamics of policy administration: Bureaucratic influence over securities regulation. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 1083-1121.
28.
Krause, G.A. ( 1999). Two-way street: The institutional dynamics of the modern administrative state. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
29.
Linton, R.J. ( 2004). A history of the NLRB judges division: With special emphasis on the early years. Washington, DC: The National Labor Relations Board.
30.
Mashaw, J.L. ( 1983). Bureaucratic justice: Managing social security disability claims. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
31.
Mashaw, J.L. ( 1999). Greed, chaos, and governance: Using public choice to improve public law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
McCubbins, M., & Schwartz, T. ( 1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 2, 165-179.
33.
Meier, K.J., & Bohte, J. ( 2007). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the 4th branch of government (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson/Wadsworth .
34.
Miller, E.B. ( 1980). An administrative appraisal of the NLRB. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
35.
Moe, T.M. ( 1982). Regulatory performance and presidential administration . American Journal of Political Science, 26, 197-224.
36.
Moe, T.M. ( 1985). Control and feedback in economic regulation: The case of the NLRB. American Political Science Review, 79, 1094-1116.
37.
Niskanen, W. ( 1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
38.
Poole, K.T., & Rosenthal, H. ( 1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 228-278.
39.
Ringquist, E.J., & Emmert, C.E. ( 1999). Judicial policymaking in published and unpublished decisions: The case of environmental civil litigation. Political Research Quarterly, 52, 7-37.
40.
Rosenbloom, D. ( 1983). Public administration & the law: Bench v. bureau . New York, NY: Marcel Decker.
41.
Rowland, C.K., & Carp, R.A. ( 1996). Politics and judgment in federal district courts. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
42.
Ruhlen, M. ( 1982). Manual for administrative law judges (Administrative Conference of The United States). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43.
Segal, J.A., & Spaeth, H.J. ( 2002). The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Segal, J., Timpone R., & Howard, R.M. ( 2000). Buyer beware? Presidential influence through Supreme Court appointments. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 557-573.
45.
Shipan, C.R. ( 2004). Regulatory regimes, agency actions, and the conditional nature of congressional influence. American Political Science Review, 98, 467-480.
46.
Songer, D.R., Segal, J.A., & Cameron, C.M. ( 1994). The hierarchy of justice: Testing a principal-agent model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court interactions. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 673-696.
47.
Songer, D.R., Segal, J.A., & Cameron, C.M. ( 1995). An empirical test of the rational-actor theory of litigation . Journal of Politics, 57, 1119-1129.
48.
Wilson, W. ( 1887). The study of administration. Political Research Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
49.
Wold, J.T. ( 1978). Going through the motions: The monotony of appellate court decision making. Judicature, 62, 58-65.
50.
Wood, B.D., & Waterman, R.W. (1994). Bureaucratic dynamics: The role of bureaucracy in a democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
