This article examines how three potential effects of television news affect the public's perceptions of candidates. Data are used from the networks' nightly news coverage of each candidate during the 1984 Democratic primary campaign and from the National Election Study's 1984 Continuous Monitoring Survey. The analysis provides support for the existence of candidate-specific attention, horse race, and tone effects on (1) the mass public's assessment of a candidate's attractiveness, (2) people's willingness to vote for a candidate, and (3) judgments about a candidate's likelihood of garnering the nomination. Television coverage of candidates matters but in different ways and to different degrees across candidates. Finally, there is evidence for the power of strong indirect media effects, a testimony to the rapid diffusion of media messages into the wider political culture.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartels, Larry M.1985. Expectations and preferences in presidential nominating campaignsAmerican Political Science Review79:804-15
2.
. —. 1988. Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Bennett, W. Lance.1983. News: The politics of illusion.New York: Longman.
4.
Berelson, Bernard R.1954. Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Brady, Henry E., and Michael G. Hagen .1986. The "horse-race" or the issues? What do voters learn from presidential primaries?Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association
6.
Brady, Henry E., and Richard Johnston .1987. What's the primary message: Horse race or issue journalism? In Media and momentum: TheNewHampshire primary and nomination politics, edited by Garry R. Orren and Nelson W. Polsby, 127-86. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
7.
Erbring, Lutz, Edie Goldenberg, and Arthur Miller.1980. Front-page news and real world cues: A new look at agenda-settingAmerican Journal of Political Science24:16-49
8.
. Gans, Herbert.1979. Deciding what's news.New York : Vintage.
9.
Joslyn, Richard.1984. Mass media and elections.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10.
Kinder, Donald R., and David O. Sears.1985. Public opinion and political action In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson, 659-741. Vol. 2, 3d ed. New York: Random House.
11.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder.1987. News that matters: Television and American opinionChicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Lazarsfeld, Paul, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet.1968. The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential election.3d ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
Masters, Roger D.1990. Biology and political theoryAmerican Political Science Review84:195-210
14.
. Masters, Roger D., and Denis G. Sullivan.1989. Nonverbal displays and political leadership in France and the United StatesPolitical Behavior11:121-53
15.
. McCombs, M.E.1981. The agenda setting approach In Handbook of political communication, edited by D. D. Sanders and K. R. Sanders. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Miller, Warren, and the National Election Studies.1988. American national election study, 1984 continuous monitoring, versions 1-4. Computer file, ICPSR editionAnn Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
17.
Nimmo, Dan.1970. The political persuaders: The techniques of modern election campaigns.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth.1984. The spiral of silence: Public opinion-Our social skin.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Orren, Garry R., and Nelson W. Polsby. eds. 1987. Media and momentum: The New Hampshire primary and nomination politics.Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
20.
Patterson, Thomas E.1980. The mass media election: How Americans choose their president.New York: Praeger .
21.
Patterson, Thomas E., and Robert D. McClure .1976. The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national elections.New York: Putnam.
22.
Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune.1970. The logic of comparative social inquiry.New York: Wiley.
23.
Roberts, Donald F., and Nathan Maccoby.1985. Effects of mass communication In Handbook of social psychology, edited by Gardner Lindzey and Elliot Aronson, 539-98. Volume 2, 3d ed. New York: Random House.
24.
Robinson, Michael J., and Margaret A. Sheehan .1983. Over the wire and on TV: CBS and UPI in campaign '80.New York: Russell Sage.
25.
Sullivan, Denis G., and Roger D. Masters .1988. Happy warriors: Leaders' racial displays and viewers' emotions, and political supportAmerican Journal of Political Science32:345-68
26.
. Weaver, David H., Doris A.Graber, MaxwellE. McCombs, and Chaim H. Eyal.1981. Media agenda-setting in a presidential election.New York: Praeger.
