Ward, A. (2020). Braiding as a Feminist Methodology: Tensions and Possibilities of Weaving Together. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 21(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708620953200.
Ward, A. (2020). Braiding as a Feminist Methodology: Tensions and Possibilities of Weaving Together. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 21(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708620953200.
This article was withdrawn after publication.
References
1.
BermanJ. C. (1999). Bad hair days in the Paleolithic: Modern (re)conceptions of the cave man. American Anthropologist, 101(2), 288–304.
BurkhardT. (2020). “A new spelling of my name”: Becoming a (Black, feminist, immigrant) autoethnographer through Zami. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 20(2), 124–133. https://doi-org.proxy.lib.fsu.edu/10.1177/1532708619878744
ClarkV.Pacini-KetchabawV.HodginsB. D. (2014). Thinking with paint: Troubling settler colonialisms through early childhood art pedagogies. International Journal of Child, Youth, and Family Studies, 5(42), 751–781.
HofsessB. A.UlmerJ.CarlisleJ.CaldwellS. (2019). Curating with ecologies of girlhood. International Journal of Education through Art, 15(3), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00008_3
20.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
MohantyC. T. (2002). “Under Western eyes” revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(2), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.1086/342914
29.
NadkarniA. (2017). Transnational feminism. In O’BrienE. (Ed.), Literacy and critical theory. Oxford University Press.
30.
NagarR. (2002). Footloose researchers, “travelling” theories, and the politics of transnational feminist praxis. Gender, Place & Culture, 2, 179.
NagarR.SwarrA. L. (2010). Theorizing transnational feminist praxis. In SwarrA. L.NagarR. (Eds.), Critical transnational feminist praxis (pp. 1–20). State University of New York Press.
34.
NashJ. (2019). Black feminism reimagined: After intersectionality. Duke University Press.
35.
Oklahoma State Department of Education. (2019a, August26). Social Studies. Retrieved March 18, 2020, from https://sde.ok.gov/social-studies
SiddiqiD. M. (2011). Transnational feminism and “local” realities: The imperiled Muslim woman and the production of (in)justice. Hawwa, 9(1–2), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920811X578548
45.
SnowC. C. (2001, February28). Confirmed deaths: A preliminary report [Tulsa Race Riot: A Report by the Oklahoma Commission to Study the Tulsa Race Riot of 1921]. https://www.okhistory.org/research/forms/freport.pdf
46.
StaeheliL. A.NagarR. (2002). Feminists talking across worlds. Gender, Place & Culture, 9(2), 167.
47.
StanleyC. A. (2007). When counter narratives meet master narratives in the journal editorial review process. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 14–24.
48.
SwarrA. L.NagarR. (Eds.) (2010). Critical transnational feminist praxis. State University of New York Press.
49.
TedlockB. (2011). Braiding narrative ethnography with memoir and creative nonfiction. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 331–340). SAGE.
